Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Is it the business process that is broken? (Score 1) 303

My response to both of these is: Ever hear of “QA”? Hire some. For Brick, the loss of credibility is substantial. For Delta and Brick, the loss of dollars is quite high. As a QA professional, there have been many times that I’ve more than paid for my keep by finding critical bugs in developer code. However is this era of “ship it today, we’ll fix it tomorrow” (and they never do fix it); problems such as these abound. Don’t blame the customer for you being short sighted. If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the oven. For these (and more) you should fire your QA managers (or may chance hire one in the first place?). Your software development process is broken, and you need to take this as a warning. How many times have people blamed the computer (“Computer error”); when the fault is with the business process (or lack)? How many business are connected to the internet that shouldn't be - or shouldn't have been (read: Target)?

Comment Re:Lie-fest from the NSA (Score 1) 504

Issues:
1. There is no proof that he hacked.
2. Again, hacking - copying.

I added the "(minor detail)" as it was just that, a minor detail. I listed it to show that our so-called "news" can't report the basic technical information correctly, much less the details of what happened.

Also note: I'm not holding up Snowden as a hero. I have strong reservations on what he's done -- there are better ways to be a whistle blower, You cannot un-ring a bell, and we've known for some time now that the NSA has been doing things illegally. My key point -- John Miller and 60 minutes lost an opportunity.

Comment Re:Lie-fest from the NSA (Score 5, Informative) 504

I could only watch the first part of the lies by the NSA, and the failure of 60 minutes -- John Miller to follow up.

For starters -- Snowden didn't steal anything: he copied it (minor detail).

What Snowden did was compared to killing 10 people. Snowden didn't kill anyone.

We were told that NSA can't access information unless they had a warrant: Again, false on many occasions, some documented here on /. (Do I *really* need to provide the references?) The NSA continually provides information to law enforcement agencies w/o warrant.

Anyone else notice: They have ACTUAL phone numbers, the REAL ones. Google your own phone number some time to see about so-called meta-data.

No mention of what the NSA had been doing - in violation of court orders (only a brief and casual mention of so-called accidental overstepping). I call BS on this one.

I had hoped that 60 minutes would do an insightful - investigation into NSA. What I heard from so-called reporter John Miller was a PR fluff piece that one would expect as a former national spokesman for the FBI.

Comment As someone who uses POTS/VOIP and Cell (Score 3, Informative) 582

Don't remove POTS. Some key reasons:
In case of incident (Natural / man made). Here in Seattle (area), several years ago we had a large wind storm that took out most of the power in the entire region. Many areas didn't have power for over a week. Cell phone - towers died after about three days. That's right: The TOWERS failed. Also, you couldn't get gasoline; no power at the pumps (Read local generators - at homes - started giving out).

In some areas of Seattle, people have their choice of which ISP they like (DSL, Cable, fiber optic, wireless) which is all fine and good for a VOIP carrier. Ask any of the phone companies what will happen when the power goes out? You can't call... 911, the power company, anyone for any emergency service, much less a call such as "I'm alive and okay", or "need food, shelter" (in case of some emergency).

I have family in north eastern WA. Where they are at, there is not viable alternative to dial-up. No VOIP, and spotty cell phone availability.

Cell phones... great sound unless you are in a dead area (there are a lot more of these than the phone company's are willing to admit); or as noted the power is out for an extended time.

Just because it (POTS) isn't as profitable as cell - or as well regulated, doesn't men it should be dismantled.

Submission + - Ask Slashdot: Looking for RAID Calculator

Bomarc writes: I’m looking for "RAID calculator" — that will provide recommendations for optional settings based on hardware information data entry; a way to calculate or warn that the optional parameters of controller and/or OS to keep the drive from "thrashing". Here I define "thrashing" as a way to reduce or eliminate the need to read and re-write a sector(s) that has just been written to. Most of what I've found so far is a size calculator, and if you need one of these, I believe that you are in the wrong business.

Example: a hard drive as an example that I’m currently using is a WD red 2 TB Drive for NAS (WD20EFRX). This drive has a 64MB buffer; a sustained read/write speed off 147 MB/s; bytes per sector 512(logical) / 4096(physical) bytes per sector; 3,907,029,168 sectors; 2,000,398 MB space; connected (in this instance) to a Dell Perc 5 with 256MB RAM – that can be configured to a stripe size with data segments of 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 Kbytes. Under the OS, the sector size includes 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16K, 32K and 64K. The drive bays vary from 2 to 10 drives per array per system (2 drives as RAID 1; 4 as RAID 5, 6 or 10; 6, 8 and 10 drives as RAID 5 or 6)

In this example: The hard drive utilizes 4K bytes (physical) per sector; so with a 4 bay system (RAID 5 with 3 data drives; one parity drive) would result in a single stripe of 12K (with 16K of physical data that would include parity) data being written to the drive in one pass. Note however: That 12K does not go evenly into any of the stripe size, nor does it go evenly into the OS sector size. The result is "thrashing". The user will see a performance degradation (depending on where it occurs) as the controller reads a sector from the drive, merge the data with the outgoing RAID data, and re-writes the physical data to the drive for the sector(s) that are out — bound. If you are lucky to be writing large files, hopefully the logic in the controller will keep the “thrashing” process to a minimum. In an extreme example: you could have a stripe size of 8K and an OS sector size 128 k; with this configuration it could take 16 writes to get the data out — and we haven’t even dealt with hard drive sector size issues; that could bump the number up 128 writes for a medium sized RAID array!

So, back to the question: Has someone made available a "RAID calculator" out there that takes in these considerations — and shows or warns the user that there might be a problem, and/or hints the best configuration for a given hardware setup?

Submission + - How Is Data Recovered From A Dead Hard Drive?

liwee writes: Quote: "In a blind panic, I called the biggest name in disk disaster recovery, Seagate Recovery Services, and in the process stumbled into a fascinating photo story. What follows is not meant to be a commercial for Seagate. The company did not pay for this coverage. The Tom’s Hardware editors and I simply recognized that a lot of people need recovery help, and a glimpse behind the curtain at how those operations get done might be enlightening for consumers and business users alike."

Comment Re: How? (Score 1) 401

There is so much that Paramount COULD have done but didn't.

In the first reboot by JJ; he crated an exciting movie, but why bother to call it ST? (The 2nd one really sucked - with the number of GLARING plot holes, errors and bad re-writes. It is the first ST move that I won't buy)

Movies that I would like to see that would require actual THOUGHT to write: The Constellation - and the the Dooms Day Device with Decker loosing his crew, Captain Kirk's Brother - when the planet they were on was invaded. One item that really tested Kirk's metal: The vampire cloud and watching Captain Garrovick die.
The list of possible good movies goes on...

I am looking forward to seeing this, by the people the care about ST!

Submission + - New GMail compose inspires user backlash 1

s13g3 writes: Yesterday, Google finally rolled out the "new compose" as a mandatory change to all users, eliminating the "old" compose option with no way to revert. The move has sparked such a significant amount of user backlash on Google's product forums that moderators are having to close hundreds of "I hate the new compose" threads as "duplicates" and are directing people to the main feedback thread, which is currently over 21 pages some 24 hours later. So far, there appears to be nothing in the way of a response or recognition from Google of the amount of hate the change has inspired, only an insistence that somehow the input of "Top Moderators" from their forums since October 2012 resulted in a number of "improvements" to the new compose in response, which supposedly makes it easier to use, but does nothing to address the laundry list of complaints and issues people have with it: simply put, no one likes the new compose, and significant numbers of users are threatening to abandon the service as a result of this forced change.

Submission + - Microsoft Censors OpenOffice Download Links (torrentfreak.com)

crashcy writes:

Hoping to remove pirated versions of Microsoft Office from the Internet, the software company has sent several DMCA takedowns to Google, listing copies of its open source competitor Open Office as copyright infringements.

Since this is restricted to Bing search engine it probably hasn't cost Open Office any downloads yet.

Slashdot Top Deals

MESSAGE ACKNOWLEDGED -- The Pershing II missiles have been launched.

Working...