You cannot support one, without full acceptance of the other.
I disagree. It's possible to accept the fact that criminals will get away and yet not support executions at all, which is what I do.
That's changing the argument. Anyhow, I wasn't disagreeing with you.
My response was to the AC posting:
Innocent people getting executed is perfectly acceptable to me as long as the error rates are low. The order of society is far more important than a single insignificant persons life.
As for accepting criminals getting away with their acts, I understand that. We cannot engineer a perfect criminal justice system. There are mistakes, there are some times criminal acts along the way. But I won't ever say to a person - well you weren't really guilty, but hey, that's the breaks dude.Society benefits by your improper incarceration.
The thing that is so odd about the "Acceptable level" of false positives crowd, that in a country that really really wants to make sure someone goes to jail, I always have three questions for the tough on crime crowd:
1. You like to be tough on crime - Why do you approve of allowing criminals to go free? Sounds like liberal claptrap to me....
2. How many guilty murderers do you find okay to let go free. 10 , 100, all of them?
3. are you accepting of being personally executed for a murder you didn't commit? Your wife? Your children?
And it doesn't have to be about capital crimes, just if a person is accepting of having say his or her life destroyed for something they didn't do. 40 years of 3 hots and a cot, and don't forget your own vaseline, sometimes Bubba gets sand in his.
You see, I'm not actually arguing with you - this was just a place to jump in.