Well, perhaps start making some hardware people could like or get excited about besides the bland crap that keeps coming out. Even Alienware got boring after being bought by Dell.
Given that the one big "exciting" thing that all the PC makers are touting these days is adding some kind of AI chip, I'll stick with cheap and boring.
I've got a couple of cardboard boxes in my garage that are over 50 years old, and they're still storing things just fine.
However, if I threw one under some mulch in the back yard, it would probably biodegrade within a few months.
The article didn't seem to have much more info than TFS so I'm guessing here, but in general, you may not need to generate net power for fusion to be useful for rocket thrust.
There's plenty of solar power available in space (at least near the inner planets), and as the Farnsworth fusor showed decades ago, it's not hard to generate fusion reactions if you don't expect positive energy output. For some space missions, propellant mass is very important, and getting the highest velocity exhaust is the goal. Using solar energy to induce fusion reactions could be one way to do this. Of course, like most ion drives, this would be very low thrust over long time spans.
How long before they add AI-generated tooltips to Notepad that show sponsored links to products and services related to what you typed?
Looks like Brandon is now a coding expert, eh?
He might be, since in this case his advice is perfectly valid.
"But Derp! Derp! I can write perfect C++!!!!"
Just shut up.
#define PI 3.2
To be fair, it's been hard for them to keep up with the constant churn of the "move fast and break things" COBOL culture.
Integer out of range
OK, I give up. Which integer is out of range?
Why not send this to see if it helps:
100 FOR X=0 to 65535
200 POKE X, INT(RND(1) * 256)
300 NEXT X
So let me get this straight. You're a Republican, and you're NOT voting for trump in November?
With your profanity-laced language and your low IQ statements, you certainly seem like you will.
Should they be then talking about "endocrine-disrupting additives such as plasticizers" instead?
I don't know. Maybe they should, if you're unable to comprehend the problem otherwise.
I don't think you have all that much in the way of "chemistry understanding".
It's not the base polymers that people are worried about. It's the endocrine-disrupting additives such as plasticizers.
Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.
