So you wouldn't call it racism if someone is up for a parole hearing, and they are denied because an algorithm was tuned to deny black people? The article has a reasonable point, even if it has a shitty title. Or let me guess, you're one of those "race realists" who just happens to feel that whites are superior.

And you think this has anything to do with net neutrality? This is whataboutism at its worst.

So the DNC shouldn't have any opinion on who gets appointed to which office? I don't see anything in the emails like "he can get this office... if he donates another $100,000"

Yep: http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cp...

That would be awful. It's natural for real-time data like a phone call to have higher priority than a video stream that's buffered far in advance. To not prioritize different protocols would be irresponsible management of the network.

I heard that when the robot broke down, it started repeating "We need to dispel this myth that Obama doesn't know what he's doing..."

When you're rate limited to 1 guess per hour after a few failed guesses, 6 or even 4 digits is plenty.

I almost laughed myself do death reading this. You should really put a warning at the beginning of your post.

It's not the advertisers you're sticking it to, though. You're taking revenue away from the content producers, so that eventually that content will go away.

This is disingenuous and you know it. It's like pointing back at that one oddly warm day back in February and saying "it hasn't gotten any warmer since then!".

Care to elaborate on that?

No! It's difficult all the time or easy all the time!

Exactly. Hard to draw a line between state funds and the private funds of the ruler when "l'état, c'est mo": the ruler is the state.

Really? Sounds like you're screwing something up pretty bad, haven't seen one of those in about 6 or 7 years.