Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - India plans fastest supercomputer by 2017 (indianexpress.com)

darkstar019 writes: India is planning a 100 Million computer that is going to be at least 61 times faster than Sequoia, if its roadmap finishes as expected. Currently, the most powerful supercomputer is at 58th position in the list of top 100 supercomputers(http://www.top500.org/list/2012/06/100).
What remains to be seen is whether this claim will be met or would it be another failed project due to corruption or incompetence.

Music

Submission + - A glimpse at piracy in the UK and beyond (bbc.co.uk) 1

Zocalo writes: The BBC has a fascinating look into the music download habits of the UK population based on stats compiled by Musicmetric. The stats, gathered through the monitoring of BitTorrent swarms and geo-locating the IPs, shows the hotspots for music copyright infringement across the UK and regional preferences for certain types of music. Some of the outliers are somewhat unusual though, suggesting some problems with the methodology or sample size, unless people on the Isle of Wight really do prefer trumpet-playing crooner Louis Armstrong to the likes of Rihanna and Ed Sheeran who top the lists nationwide.

Not in the UK? There are some global stats on the "Most pirated near you?" tab of the story. Better yet, if you want to crunch the numbers for yourself all of the data has been made available at the Musicmatch website under a Creative Commons license and a RESTful API to access the data (free for non-commercial use!) is also available.

Comment WASteD (Score 1) 341

Excessive counter-strike and other FPS games have rendered my desktop keyboard to wear off the WASD keys, but the keyboard is still going good - thanks to change of the internal contacts over time.

Comment Re:NEVER (Score 1) 398

"you could use it anywhere you could use a scooter. " Try riding this car in a bazaar (typical Indian streets) 45 mph = 72kmph; which is much more than typical Indian street traffic (its somewhere around 50kmph). $10k = Too much for an average Indian, Tata nano costs around 3K and other budget sized cars cost around 5k, so this is definitely overpriced from Indian market's POV.
Iphone

Submission + - iPhone 5, iPad mini and Apple HDTV to make Apple a trillion-dollar company (bgr.com)

redkemper writes: Apple on Monday became the most valuable U.S. company in history — sort of. The company’s market capitalization surpassed the previous record of about $619 billion achieved by Microsoft in December 1999, though that figure balloons to $842.5 billion when accounting for inflation. According to Topeka Capital Markets analyst Brian White, Apple will soon become the most valuable company of all time with or without inflation as its market cap sails to $1 trillion and beyond...

Submission + - Anonymous target UK government websites (bbc.co.uk)

Martin S. writes: "As Anonymous targets UK government websites in Assange protest and have little effect with the 10 Downing Street and the Home Office sites are still available at this time.

The Guardian, the British Publisher for WikiLeaks and one time ally for Assange increases its distance from him with some hard questions concerning inconvenient truths."

Security

Submission + - G4S and the London 2012 Olympic Game Security Crisis (ultimatesecurity-investigation.co.uk)

linzmcwilliams writes: "G4S will donate 2.5 million pounds to British military sports and welfare organisations after failing to provide enough security staff for the London 2012 Olympic Games but was it really their fault?

Firstly, no mention has yet been made of the direct connection between attempting to recruit and train staff for what is ostensibly temporary work, and the existing reliable benefit system for the unemployed.

It’s too easy to think there are thousands of unemployed out there who must be desperate for work. The reality is some of the unemployed are well catered for by a range of benefits. As such, any offer of work has to be worth it. If you tell an applicant it’s only temporary work, say for a couple of months, a significant percentage will say it’s not worth coming off benefits for.

Secondly, all Security Officers have to be licensed by the Security Industry Authority. To gain this licence they must undergo recognised training as well as a screening and vetting process and Criminal Record Bureau (CRB) check. This process is usually paid for by the applicant themselves. In this scenario I imagine the contract G4S received from the Government will have included sufficient funds to pay for this process. The problem is these people were only ever going to receive temporary employment. As such, some of them, having been trained, vetted, CRB checked and licensed, will have applied for full time security jobs elsewhere.

Finally, having recruited staff for temporary work it is imperative that regular contact is maintained prior to their eventual deployment. Failure to maintain regular contact with newly recruited personnel will inevitably result in some of those staff not turning up as either it’s not worth coming off their benefits for, or they have found alternative full time employment.

G4S faced a logistical nightmare due to sheer numbers. Perhaps questions ought to be asked of Theresa May as to the validity of the decision to place such a large contractual obligation with only 1 main security supplier?"

Games

Submission + - Sleeping Dogs Review (blogspot.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Sleeping Dogs is a good game all around. Excellent story, enjoyable fighting and amazing driving, make it the first open world game, of this type, that i have liked in a long time.
Security

Submission + - G4S and the 2012 Olympic Games (ultimatesecurity-investigation.co.uk)

An anonymous reader writes: G4S will donate 2.5 million pounds to British military sports and welfare organisations after failing to provide enough security staff for the London 2012 Olympic Games but was it really their fault?

Firstly, no mention has yet been made of the direct connection between attempting to recruit and train staff for what is ostensibly temporary work, and the existing reliable benefit system for the unemployed.

It’s too easy to think there are thousands of unemployed out there who must be desperate for work. The reality is some of the unemployed are well catered for by a range of benefits. As such, any offer of work has to be worth it. If you tell an applicant it’s only temporary work, say for a couple of months, a significant percentage will say it’s not worth coming off benefits for.

Secondly, all Security Officers have to be licensed by the Security Industry Authority. To gain this licence they must undergo recognised training as well as a screening and vetting process and Criminal Record Bureau (CRB) check. This process is usually paid for by the applicant themselves. In this scenario I imagine the contract G4S received from the Government will have included sufficient funds to pay for this process. The problem is these people were only ever going to receive temporary employment. As such, some of them, having been trained, vetted, CRB checked and licensed, will have applied for full time security jobs elsewhere.

Finally, having recruited staff for temporary work it is imperative that regular contact is maintained prior to their eventual deployment. Failure to maintain regular contact with newly recruited personnel will inevitably result in some of those staff not turning up as either it’s not worth coming off their benefits for, or they have found alternative full time employment.

G4S faced a logistical nightmare due to sheer numbers. Perhaps questions ought to be asked of Theresa May as to the validity of the decision to place such a large contractual obligation with only 1 main security supplier?

Slashdot Top Deals

An adequate bootstrap is a contradiction in terms.

Working...