Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I honestly can't understand why... (Score 1) 286

For most of the US there are only 4 cell phone options, period. All 4 are blatantly evil companies that are out to screw every last penny out of you while denying you service whenever possible. In most rural locations there are really only 2 options: AT&T and Verizon. These are the two most evil of the bunch. If you don't like what either one is selling, you do without cell phone service.

Occasionally you get lucky and a small company like, say, Iowa Wireless may provide slightly less rapacious rates, but typically they only cover a small region and offer out-of-date phones.

Why yes, the cell phone service situation in the USA IS absolutely insane.

Comment Re:How do they tell? (Score 1) 286

Highly illegal deep packet inspection. :) It breaks a ton of privacy laws put in place by the Fed AND local governments.

Actually there is no federal or state law on the book that restricts the use of DPI by service providers. Using DPI to route traffic DOES place at risk their "Safe harbor" status under the DMCA. Unfortunately, since ISPs are now agreeing to be the private police force for copyright holders that no longer matters.

Comment Re:Space is not an answer (Score 1) 482

The fact that we can't manage this planet (yet) is an argument for moving beyond it. A permanent off-planet presence is the best thing we can do to avoid extinction.

The "space option" as you put it doesn't imply our planet is disposable. It implies that if we're interested in not being disposable ourselves, we need to get some of our eggs out of this particular basket. Migration off-planet is not and will never be a solution to over-population.

Comment Re:Next stop: Moon (Score 1) 572

and how much fuel was already wasted to get the crap up where it is now?

my point is reusing what was already achieved. *everything* other than dropping it into the ocean is better.

I appreciate the sentiment, believe me. It's really wrenching to think of all that effort, money, and material burning up in reentry, but it's not as simple as "let's send it to the moon". It might -just- be feasible, though, to move it to a higher, more stable orbit and "park" it there until we can do something else with it. We wouldn't be able to shuttle crews to it any more, but I bet we could pack it full of science goodies and remote waldos so it could continue to serve us in some capacity.

Hell, install a small nuclear reactor in it, attach a few more arms and an ion drive and maybe we could use it as a remote repair bay for other satellites.

Comment Re:Next stop: Moon (Score 1) 572

That's just sad... it should be landed on the moon. It it's too big in one piece, dismantle it and land the components. Even refurbishing as a "robot station" with just that robotic arm and the solar sails and some positioning systems for satellite repair or something would be better, than letting it all crash and burn. how about parking it in a different orbit... maybe around the moon?

Sure, we'll put it in orbit around the moon. You work out how to get about 6,000 tons of propellent up there and I'll take care of the rest.

Comment It's the templates. (Score 1) 113

The problem isn't Powerpoint. Powerpoint is a fine piece of presentation software. The problem is that people don't know how to present information effectively, and it's the TEMPLATES included with Powerpoint (and every other chunk of presentation software I've ever seen) that encourage this. If MS wants to alleviate Powerpoint hate, they need to revise their included templates to demonstrate what a good, informative presentation can be.

Slashdot Top Deals

The cost of feathers has risen, even down is up!

Working...