Comment Re:Why bother with installed capacity? (Score 1) 259
They have a wind farm in Wellington. It's called West Wind.
That's Wellington's secondary wind farm. The primary wind farm is called The Beehive.
They have a wind farm in Wellington. It's called West Wind.
That's Wellington's secondary wind farm. The primary wind farm is called The Beehive.
Seems they should track down the source of any possible hardware infections before replacing all hardware.
"No! Shut them *all* down, hurry! Listen to them, they're dying R2! Curse my metal body, I wasn't fast enough, it's all my fault!"
From TFA:
Firefox users point out that this isnâ(TM)t very user friendly, and is very unlike Mozilla.
Actually it's very like Mozilla, at least the Mozilla from the last five years or so. You sit there, you take what we give you, and you LIKE IT, dammit!
To be fair, a retrofit to fuel cells would be relatively simple, since everything on the boat runs on electricity anyway.
Well yeah, that one's simple, but what about the unicorn farts mentioned by a previous poster? Just the torque converters for that alone would be enormous, not to mention the extra whangle drums and sliding paff gongbudgers.
"How could such an advanced culture have staged such bloody spectacles?"
Nowadays we do it with drones and remote cameras.
I've seen the exact opposite, most openers are built using shitty Princeton 2262s, which sounds like what this guy hacked. Oh, and if you've been sold a fancy "rolling-code remote", open it up and look at the hardware, if it says 2262 on the chip (or one of the many derivatives) then you've been had (many so-called rolling-code remotes aren't, the vendors just claim they are).
In practice it's even worse than the article points out, the switches are tri-state not binary but most vendors of remotes forget that so you go from 3^n to 2^n, and then they only use 8 of the 12 pins you can toggle on because they're on one side of the chip and they forget there's more around the other side. So you go from 3^12 to 2^8 combinations, meaning you'll hit the right one after 128 tries on average. The receivers have no rate-limiting, so you can run them far faster than the vendor specifies and scan the code space in seconds. The novel thing in this case is the use of de Bruijn sequences, and the fact that he scans the entire code space in the same time a standard scanner takes for the (admittedly far too common) badly-designed ones.
They're tanking search results for users ON A PC OR LAPTOP due to your mobile-friendliness.
Hey, forcing a mobile-phone interface onto an inherently desktop system worked so well for Microsoft in Windows 8 that I guess Google had to give it a go too,
More seriously, this is beyond braindamaged. Our product is mainframe middleware. Exactly zero percent of our users access our site from a phone or tablet. However, Google now wants us to optimise it for a platform that none of our users will ever use, just because, hey, Google says so. Cretins.
Their current plan is to wait charged particles to affect electronics so that it forces a reboot.
That's a pretty desperate plan, I realise that single event upsets in space are a non-uncommon event, but man, this is really last-resort stuff, the terrestrial equivalent of which would be "there may be a lightning strike in the vicinity which would glitch the electronics and cause a reboot". Sure, or there may not, in which case you're screwed. As the OP said, how was this not caught in testing?
so much of what passes for art these days is degenerate shit.
The technical term you're looking for there is from German, "entartete Kunst".
I think this may be release 2.0 of the Microsoft-aided business plan. It used to be:
1. Found startup doing something Microsoft doesn't do.
2. Wait to be bought out by Microsoft.
3. Profit!
Now it's:
1. Wait till your cellphone company is in its death throes.
2. Wait to be bought... well, you know the rest.
If you work for a cellphone vendor I guess you know it's time to dust off your resume when you hear rumours that you're being bought by Microsoft.
Never ask two questions in a business letter. The reply will discuss the one you are least interested, and say nothing about the other.