Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:dupe (Score 1) 303

However, as technology advanced that could change. If you can produce food economically without endangering animals, then raising animals simply to use them for food becomes unjustifiable. Other uses for animals might still be justified (like animal testing), but anytime a technology reduces the need for animal-based testing that is a good thing in my mind. Life has some value - even primitive life. That doesn't mean that i'm going to cry everytime I step on an ant, but on the other hand I'm not going to breed ants just so that I can step on them.

Wish had some mod points for that.

Comment Re: Maybe its the HARDWARE (Score 1) 164

I'm an atheist so I'm not shilling for creationists of any stripe. There are levels of ignorance and faith and equating a young earther with a deist or someone who believes that God stepped in creating life and man doesn't help things as well as makes for an inaccurate evaluation of the situation.

Comment Re:Maybe its the HARDWARE (Score 4, Informative) 164

You do realize that, until very recently, all these creationists were split rather equally between both dems and reps. (The gay marriage and abortion issue pushed white evangelists into the Reps side.) The black population is over 50% creationist (and 90+ are dems) and almost 50% of those who classify themselves as liberal are creationists.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/05/who-are-the-creationists-by-the-numbers/#.UdBCoDu1H4s

Another thing to think about is that all creationists are not the same. There are they young earthers as well as those who accept that the earth is billions of years old but who think that God created life (and accept minor evolutionary change).

Submission + - Breaking Supercomputers' Exaflop Barrier (slashdot.org)

Nerval's Lobster writes: Breaking the exaflop barrier remains a development goal for many who research high-performance computing (HPC). Some developers predicted that China’s new Tianhe-2 supercomputer would be the first to break through. Indeed, Tianhe-2 did pretty well when it was finally revealed—knocking the U.S.-based Titan off the top of the Top500 list of the world’s fastest supercomputers. Yet despite sustained performance of 33 petaflop/s to 35 petaflop/s and peaks ranging as high as 55 petaflops, even the world’s fastest supercomputer couldn’t make it past (or even close to) the big barrier. Now, the HPC market is back to chattering over who’ll first build an exascale computer, and how long it might take to bring such a platform online. Bottom line: It will take a really long time, combined with major breakthroughs in chip design, power utilization and programming, according to Nvidia chief scientist Bill Dally, who gave the keynote speech at the 2013 International Supercomputing Conference last week in Leipzig, Germany. In a speech he called “Future Challenges of Large-scale Computing” (and in a blog post covering similar ground), Dally described some of the incredible performance hurdles that need to be overcome in pursuit of the exaflop.

Comment Re:impossible (Score 1) 297

As stated in the earlier post - the concept of an individual right comes as virtue of being a human. The concept rejects the idea that everything comes from and is allocated by the government. As a human being we have thoughts and ideas. The government does not create these thoughts but the government may attempt to prevent us from communicating them. A just government is created via a social contract and exists with consent of the governed hence we have "rights", we have attributes, that predate the government. Therefore these rights did not come from the government. In fact the govt exists to protect these rights.

Anyway, that in a nutshell is the concept of individual rights - as I see it.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Why can't we ever attempt to solve a problem in this country without having a 'War' on it?" -- Rich Thomson, talk.politics.misc

Working...