Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Obvious contradition? (Score 3, Informative) 82

Let's see the first line of the summary is:

"Funded by the NSF, Rice University professors and students are bringing a prototype Wi-Fi system for free to Pecan Park in Houston."

"Free?" You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

I think OPM ("Other People's Money") is what you're looking for.

Input Devices

BlindType — the Amazing Keyboard of the Future 125

kkleiner writes "BlindType has created a new touchscreen keyboard program of the same name that changes size, orientation, and position to match your wandering fingers as they type. BlindType also features some of the most impressive typing correction software I've ever seen. The result is a practical touchscreen interface that knows what you meant to type, even if you make mistakes. Lots of them. In fact, you can type without looking at the screen at all."

Comment Re:Remove the artificial monopoly (Score 1) 299

I don't know where you got that notion from but it simply doesn't match reality as I have seen. Post Offices in small towns have closed recently due to decreased volume and the employees from those offices have been let go. Existing offices are not hiring, even to replace retiring workers.

I've got your reality right here. Well, strictly speaking, 584,000 of the 600,000 USPS workers are covered by the no-layoffs clause. Sue me.

From their labor union's blog:

http://labornotes.org/node/1947

(as far as I know, the layoffs they were fearing did not materialize)

And from the CATO institute:

http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/the-postal-services-union-problem

Comment Re:Remove the artificial monopoly (Score 3, Insightful) 299

And then remove their union contract that states that they can never decrease their workforce, even if they don't need as many workers due to reduced volume.

Here's what I don't get: the Political Left tells us out of one side of their mouth that only the government can be the perfect master of fairness in the workplace, and out of the other side of their mouth they tell us that government workers need unions. At the most, one of these can be true. Some would argue that neither is true...

Comment Re:still early days (Score 4, Interesting) 428

I actually took a "free trial" of the web site (hey, I like Jeremy Clarkson's columns), and there's a lot more to it than the paywall. They also did a complete site redesign, and it's hideous - I couldn't find a damned thing on the new site, and actually reading stories involved some bizarre CSS windowing. The entire site is basically a CSS version of "Flashturbation" (CSSturbation?) - a bunch of developers showing off how technically clever they are in the process of making a crap product.

That being said, £1 a week would be much too high, even if the site didn't suck sweaty rhino ass.... £1 pound a day is flat-out insane.

Comment Irony check? (Score 5, Insightful) 50

Am I the only one who grasped the dissonance between the words "comes into its own" and "$795 million in grants." Have we really stooped to the point where people have mentally redefined success and functionality as the ability to successfully lobby the government for cash?

You keep using those words. I do not think they mean what you think they mean.

Submission + - Prince declares the Internet a fad, completely ove (telegraph.co.uk)

ErikTheRed writes: The Artist Once Again Known as Prince has declared the Internet to be dead. He has refused to release his new album through any of the legal online music distribution services (iTunes, Amazon, etc), because they won't pay him an advance on royalties. From an article in The Telegraph: "All these computers and digital gadgets are no good. They just fill your head with numbers and that cant be good for you.” All I can say is, ummmm... good luck with that.

Comment Re:I wish they would like money less (Score 2, Funny) 245

I already paid once for my car. Those car companies want me to pay again every time I replace my car or buy an additional one. Even if I have two or three cars I still only drive one car at a time. Why should I have to pay more than once? Stupid, greedy car companies. The government should do something about this.

Comment "You keep using that word" (Score 3, Interesting) 97

This actually hits on one of my personal bugaboos - scientists that claim to know something "definitively" while the research or hypothesis is still warm from the metaphorical oven. Unfortunately, the institutions that employ them have figured out that you can get funding through "science by press release" - the initial press release gets the headlines; the retractions are hardly noticed (except on Slashdot). The scientists themselves are certainly culpable as well for going along with this - they should know better. Only a small percentage of theories stand the test of time. Yes, I understand that it's 2010 and we all want answers right now, dammit, but 99.99% of the time life just doesn't work that way.

So anyway, "definitively" - You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Comment Re:47" HDTV, no cable, no blue ray discs (Score 4, Insightful) 502

Pretty much. I have a fairly comprehensive cable package (not a big deal; I can afford it), but I'm getting ready to drop it anyway after many, many nights of "500 channels and nothing I want to watch." On-Demand helps a bit, but I'm thinking that Netflix or just buying DVD / BluRay makes more sense at this point. If I price out the programming that I actually "look forward to" I'm probably paying something like $20 / hour / month (with a massive pile of crap added on for "free").

There is some value to be had for the convenience and being able to participate in the social interaction geared around the current shows, but I'm not sure it's worth it. Offsetting that, not having 500 channels of crap will probably be life-enhancing (after a period of adjustment).

Slashdot Top Deals

6 Curses = 1 Hexahex

Working...