Does this take into account the co2 produced during manufacturing of the batteries and or the energy used to charge them?
Now ask those same questions for gas/diesel vehicles. How much CO2 is produced simply drilling for the oil? How much to transport it? How much to refine it? How much to deliver the gas to stations? And finally, how much once it's burned?
There is no such thing as a free ride. The best you can do is reduce.
If you REALLY want to compare costs between ICE and EV solutions, fine. Remove ALL government subsidies, tax breaks, kickbacks, and deductions both solutions are getting right now, and just tell me what it costs a consumer.
That will tends to say a lot about the overall cost of the new compared to the old. It says a lot when you simply cannot make or sell an EV without government assistance in some way. Or losing your ass on every car.
Fair points - but I suspect that ICE auto makers also couldn't "make or sell" a car without the tax breaks they get. At least not without making their shareholders unhappy with their returns, which could be a death spiral.
Also, both EVs and ICEs depend on government-funded roads. That amount probably overshadows "tax breaks, kickbacks, and deductions" by a margin wide enough to render the difference between EVs and ICEs moot. Plus, as EVs and the processes to manufacture and recycle them mature, the difference could invert, with the economic advantage going to EVs.
I'm not saying that will happen though. Thinking about the magnitude of the infrastructure rollout required to support EV market saturation gives me the willies.