as another wave of people decide the downsides of (say) Reddit
At this point, https://news.ycombinator.com/ starts to look appealing to me.
jQuery is a hack too?
Vanilla.js. Have a look over their jQuery/Vanilla-JS comparison examples and consider if you really want jQuery.
At a glance:
Vanilla JS is a fast, lightweight, cross-platform framework for building incredible, powerful JavaScript applications.
...
Vanilla JS makes everything an object, which is very convenient for OO JS applications.
Native support for HTML5 and other cutting-edge technologies makes me keep coming back to Vanilla JS, time after time.
Vanilla JS is the lowest-overhead, most comprehensive framework I've ever used.
77 sqkm=77e+6 sqm
Solar constant approx 1300w/sqm
=>total incident power = approx 1e+11 W.
Declared output 4000MW =4e9 W.
if assume this to be the peak power, the conversion efficiency is 4% - WTH??
if assuming this to be power averaged over an entire daylight period.... mmmm... let's ignore axis titl and assume equatorial position=> (-pi/2, pi/2) Sun's ecliptic travel over daylight. Cosine law integrated over the (-pi/2, pi/2) gives a factor of 2, while the max area (if the sun would be straight on top the entire day) would be pi. So, an averaging (fill) factor of 2/pi=0.64. so, if we are speaking 4000MV averaged over the day, the peak power would be 6283.18 MW. Dividing to 1e+11W=> conversion efficiency: 6.28%.
What type solar panels are they going to use??!!! The regular/consumer grade PV panels are somewhere around 11-12%!!
but that's uncalled for!
What exactly from
the texts are for those
is unclear?
Or... did I miss the yesterday evening memo and the semantic of "signed up to receive" no longer cover the meaning of "called for"?
You targeted the unnecessary use of one of the two adjectives. I would have asked what he did with the ugly one.
Naaaah... as I'm well aware by direct experience: beauty it's at best a metastable state. Given enough impulses and pumping... and the system looses all the excitation and falls onto the ground state (ugly, that is). Empirically, seems like a rule that applies no matter the sex, religion, race, etc.
The classic 'American dream' is possibility. It's the idea that anyone can potentially work their way to great success, regardless of starting position. Even if they are born in poverty. It may be very difficult, but it can be done.
You know? There is a difference between possibility and probability.
To exemplify: there are higher odds you'll be injured on or near your toilet than it is to win the lottery - and, lemme guess, one necessarily takes more frequent chances with a toilet than with lotto (if you know what consequence I'm alluding here).
There are plenty of examples of people who did it via some mix of skill, luck and hard work. This is in contrast to the old way, where family background defined one's role in society to a much greater extent.
Well, one doesn't need search hard to find those thousands that lost (and were forgotten in the next minutes) for every one that has been a winner.
I guess I can take break to ponder a bit over the necessary vs the sufficient.
See, being cautios, having hope and staying positive, persevering and keeping cool will go long way in overcoming the obstacles and may seem like a necessity , but
even if you deeply believe in you, better stop kidding yourself: having rich parents is absolutely sufficient and certainly helps more than any and all the above.
Well, enough with the dreams and cliches, I really need to get back to work
and a lovely new wife that got me ahead over the last four years.
Apropos flawed questions... pardon my curiosity, but... what did you do with the old one?
(grin)
I thought that this applies to meetings.
The election and the results of it seems better summarized by If you thing the problems we create are bad,
For the impatients (or less inclined to ponder the nuances) here's my point: it is not entirely the fault of the voting constituients, "absolute-or-rate comparions" won't matter too much if all that's on the different plates to choose from is the same shit in other presentation
"Don't drop acid, take it pass-fail!" -- Bryan Michael Wendt