Bose products are spectacularly over-hyped. But they're not all that bad.
Personally, I'd rather buy something else. That said, I wouldn't question the taste of an audio expert (like the GP) who happens to think well of them.
Worse. He's claiming that AM has better sound quality than streaming.
Citation please. Seriously.
Good analog is better than shitty digital.
Shitty analog is, well, just shitty.
Thanks - so why don't the charm and the anti-charm go "poof" ?
They might not be antiparticles of each other, as they might differ in color charge.
I think that would violate color confinement because the resulting pentaquark would have a net color.
Red up quark, blue down quark, blue charmed quark, green up quark, antiblue anti-charmed quark. Net color = R+B+B+G-B = R+B+G = colorless. (Shamelessly lifted from the "2015 LHCb results" section of the Wikipedia page for the pentaquark.)
Wait
Did you mean to swap the blue and green on the charmed and up quarks? That would in fact make the charmed quarks not anti-particles to each other. I'm not sure that's even possible (I'm not an expert on the standard model, let alone pentaquarks) but I assume it would at least not violate Pauli exclusion (because the two up-quarks aren't the same color.)
I'm not sure about that being "really" bright, but point taken. It's within the operating range of a good smartphone camera.
Since the amount of light that is cast on an object is exponential with regard to distance
You mean inverse-square with respect to distance. The inverse-square law applies when the source is a point (or uniformly-luminous sphere that is far enough away.)
Pluto is about 40 AU away from the Sun, whereas the Earth is 1 AU away. That means sunlight on Pluto's surface is about 1/40^2 = 1/1600 as bright as on the Earth's surface. That's dim, but not hard to record with good optics, a sensitive detector, and enough exposure time.
IIRC, they said the postulated radioactive core would not provide enough energy to create what they now see.
In the feed NASA stated they both locked up early on and ruled out tidal forces as being a factor.
One of the panel-members said tidal heating was no longer a factor.
Perhaps you and the GP are both right?
Shares don't have an average daily volume.
Correct. Share's don't. Public companies do. Therefore we say "Company X has an average daily volume of Y shares."
So a correct FTFY would be "TWTR has a Average Daily Volume of 20,664,680 traded shares.
The traded qualifier is implied. Nobody bothers to add it, except for those who are pedantic. And speaking of that:
If you're going to be pedantic, at least be correct.
You might want to follow your own advice.
Bag phones were semi-portable, hence the name. Per the article, some models had a maximum output of 3 watts.
TWTR has a Average Daily Volume of 20,664,680 shares. Today's volume was 50,045,757.
FTFY
Ah! Thanks for that. After I posted, I wondered if that was possible.
Thanks - so why don't the charm and the anti-charm go "poof" ?
They might not be antiparticles of each other, as they might differ in color charge.
I think that would violate color confinement because the resulting pentaquark would have a net color.
Thanks - so why don't the charm and the anti-charm go "poof" ?
No doubt they do. Many exotic particles don't have long lifetimes. I'm not sure what the pentaquark's lifetime is.
The J/psi meson, which consists of a charm-anticharm pair, lives for about 7.2 x 10^-21 s.
"More precisely the states must be formed of two up quarks, one down quark, one charm quark and one anti-charm quark.”
+1.
In detail...
up quark: +2/3
down quark: -1/3
charm quark: +2/3
anti-charm quark: -2/3
2/3 + 2/3 - 1/3 + 2/3 - 2/3 = +1.
Nauseous - that which causes or induces nausea.
No, you're thinking of nauseating.
GP was using "nauseous" correctly. Not that I agree with anything else s/he said.
The best book on programming for the layman is "Alice in Wonderland"; but that's because it's the best book on anything for the layman.
