Comment or injuries (Score 1) 385
or physical injuries to the head, but the point is the same - part X of the brain is damaged, subject's function Y is impaired, so part X is related to function Y
or physical injuries to the head, but the point is the same - part X of the brain is damaged, subject's function Y is impaired, so part X is related to function Y
I wonder if this is a $cientology anti-psychiatry rant.
yeah, I have smaller versions of my collection for smaller drives, with the most important stuff being on the smaller drives for the most part. It's amazing how little space the personal documents use up compared to the music collection.
7.46GB USB drive (5.22GB used), 74.5GB main hard drive (67.1GB used), 849GB secondary hard drive (302GB used, including a backup of the main hard drive)
I interpreted that as "stuff I could re-pirate"
it seems unfair and counterproductive to shut out people who acquired the product elsewhere - logically, their opinions would be just as valid as people who purchased the product on Amazon.
However, I don't see how you could reliably allow those while still reliably shutting out people who haven't used the product at all.
Also, purchased-on-Amazon can lead to seller/shipment complains irrelevant to the product itself, a different problem.
a lot of critics seem to be at their best when making fun of bad stuff. assuming the thing really is bad, then that's both entertaining and fair.
there's plenty of people who are apparently incapable of reading the product description before purchase and then give horrible reviews because their new pizza slicer makes a lousy HDTV antenna. Or down-rate a product because the particular supplier they purchased from took six weeks to deliver it, or the UPS guy decided to play street hockey with the box, etc.
Yes, many people leave reviews unrelated the product. That's a negative that Amazon should do something about (delete those after users flag them?) but there still seems to be plenty of upside in having more reviews.
okay, 50 Shades sounds like crap, but I often see fanboys/fangirls overrate decent stuff - modern mainstream franchises are most likely to have such problems, and it can annoy the saner fans.
"I would rather play Chiquita Banana and have my swimming pool than play Bach and starve." - Xavier Cugat
PS
I resent Hunger Games being associated with Twilight, much deeper despite some surface similarities
The page is still up to me. looks like a normal profile from what's publicly visible.
Alice herself was stealing the sugar cubes?
uncanny valley - in short, not quite real gets a worse response than being obviously fake
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley
I'd absolutely support modifying the food stamp system to cover them.
Also, 'poaching' implies illegal hunting which often doesn't mean gun control violations - is that what you meant?
I am well awar eof the theory, but have yet to hear an explanation of how it would work in practice - regular firearms versus military-grade hardware? come on now.
agreed, and I said something similar about comparing gun control to drug control
The solution of this problem is trivial and is left as an exercise for the reader.