Stop being so obtuse.
For all intents and purposes, science pretty much does say that the crap you "believe" in, IE, hold to be true, should be backed up by SOME evidence. Otherwise, WTF makes you believe it to be true? Some old book says it is so?
YOU ARE ALLOWED TO *BELIEVE* otherwise than what science says, but you probably ought to have SOME EVIDENCE in your new belief.
This is pretty much the basis of the scientific method. Get an idea about how something works, then find evidence that it does work that way.
TRUE science requires some kind of evidence.
That evidence can certainly be proven wrong later on, but you really shouldn't go espousing a "belief" in *something* without having at least a *shred* of evidence.
Take Gravity. Let's just say, I believe gravity is caused by all the turles. ( It's turtles all the way down! )
SCIENCE pretty much says you are an idiot, without SOME kind of evidence. Mostly, it does REQUIRE you to have SOME evidence of said turtles. I'll give it to you with a faked photo from orbit, but I'll still think you're an idiot. But at least with a faked photo, you can can show WHY you believe it.
I'm not sure "Scientific Method", or Science, means what you think it means.
Science certainly WILL "jump out of the bushes" and tell people they are wrong. Science is MOST DEFINITELY about refuting incorrect beliefs.
That is part of what makes Science so great. Black folks are inferior to white folks, mentally, IQ wise? I think science has pretty well "jumped out of the bushes" to tell them they are idiots.
Yeah, science DOES jump and tell people things.
The problem is, and this was on /. , people don't change their beliefs based on evidence, no matter how great the evidence.
Science pretty much requires you to show evidence for your beliefs. Otherwise, it ain't Science.