Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Google Police (Score 1) 200

Now, I'm not sure how it worked out that the bartender, although offered a free phone to keep quiet, still seems to have provided photos to accompany the story. Should've taken the free phone and shut up about it. I believe the story contained a disclaimer about paying for the photos.

Easy one. The people he sold the photos to probably offered him more money. Why take one free phone when you could buy several?

Comment Re:Why bother without IRV (Score 1) 221

I don't know about "99+%" ... and of course the president isn't really decided by plurality anyway. However ... some states do have a runoff system for state and local offices. I recall runoffs in Texas when I was living there. Of course the President has to be handled according to the US Constitution (the electoral college and all that), the state has no say in that.

Comment Meaningless title (Score 1) 487

Of course non-prescription use is ethical - if it is used for its intended purpose. Just because a drug doesn't require a prescription doesn't make it ineffective. And abuse is abuse, whether or not the drug requires a prescription. The summary (and presumably the article) isn't really about whether a drug happens to require a prescription or whether a drug is actually prescribed (I suppose physicians can still subscribe drugs that don't require a prescription), but whether use of a drug outside of its specific intent is ethical.

I mean, I can easily imagine that parents of a child with ADHD might hear of some non-prescription alternative, do suitable research to determine if it is likely to be effective, what an appropriate dosage for their child would be, and of course compare costs - and decide to switch to the non-prescription alternative. What, exactly, would be unethical in that?

Comment I don't get it ... (Score 4, Interesting) 137

Wouldn't the amount of C-14 have been the same for humans and Neanderthals at any given time? Therefore while we may be unclear exactly when they went extinct (presuming Bigfoot is not a surviving branch of Neanderthals), we should have a pretty good idea in the overlap. Unless they use different dating methods for different events, this really shouldn't change the general picture.

Comment Re:This is going to the supreme court (Score 1) 584

We haven't had truly anonymous ballots in years here - sort of. When you show up at the poll, they write down your ballot number next to your name. Of course no one is supposed to be able to get that information and correlate it to the actual votes, but just saying ... doesn't matter if they use bar codes or human-readable numbers, as long as no one actually can obtain both the ballots and the lists.

In that sense, no different from all this "anonymous usage data" and other statistics that most software or websites collect. Yes, it could be abused and in fact is hard to prove it is not being abused (as long as they don't tell you about it). Sorry, no idea how to solve that one ...

Comment Re:How would HUD even work? (Score 1) 53

Presumably that would require curved lenses (parabolic) reflecting the actual image to the wearer, like they use in those "holo sights" for firearms. Not impossible obviously, but not something from a standard ski goggle either.

Obviously focusing on a nearby object would be something of an issue though.

Comment Uncommentable algorithms (Score 1) 472

As a mathematician who sometimes programs, much of my code is indecipherable to non-mathematicians and any degree of commenting won't change it. If you don't understand why there's an exponential function in that code for assigning probabilities to an event in the simulation, dumping an entire textbook into the comments won't explain it to you. Can I assume at least a certain level of knowledge so I don't have to write a textbook? Well, at the time, no - I knew the expertise of the person I was coding for, he simply couldn't grasp that. (He had told me so himself, too.)

If I'd been writing for people who have my non-programming knowledge, I wouldn't need to comment on that particular algorithm at all, it's pretty basic in the field. Should there be some comment left for people who don't know that discipline? Okay, sure - but honestly it won't explain it to them.

Comment backlighting? (Score 1) 192

Personally, one of the first things I did on my XP system was change that infernal blue color scheme. Olive is so much easier on the eyes. (Yes, changed the wallpaper too.) Likewise I found my android tablet never went dark enough so I turned off Auto brightness - even in daylight I prefer it darker than they set it. (Even at minimum brightness I wish I could turn it down further at night.)

Slashdot Top Deals

fortune: cpu time/usefulness ratio too high -- core dumped.

Working...