Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:"Hard redirect" (Score 1) 376

Even if it's not legally extortion (I think it is), it still violates the contract users have with their ISPs. My contract doesn't allow any such thing.

For Christ's sake, let's just make them all Title II Common Carriers and have done with all this bullshit. It might not solve everything but it solves about 95% of it.

Comment Re:distance, please (Score 1) 93

By "every few years" I mean every new docsis/dsl version. Even the worst monopolies have been adopting the latest docsis/dsl protocols over the years albeit at a slow pace. The cost of staying on copper is lots of maintenance and minor upgrades in the future, the cost of switching to fiber is an initial investment and then smooth sailing for a long time because it's more reliable and such a significant jump in speed that you won't need to upgrade equipment for decades.

You're talking reason, which doesn't work in this context. They don't want to invest in infrastructure. Instead, they keep traffic slow on purpose, in order to create a fake "shortage" of bandwidth, thereby allowing them to charge more for less service.

It's typical monopolistic bullshit. And they get away with it because they're gigantic corporations that don't really compete in most of the U.S., because they have defined, doled-out territories.

Your argument makes sense in a free-market, business context. But it ain't a free market, and it ain't normal business. On the contrary, it has been government-collusion monopoly.

Comment Re:What's the problem... (Score 1) 92

Apple just confirmed what the Chinese government has been saying. The NSA has access to data they store. The keys are deliberately kept where the NSA has access to them. Of you don't want the US to steal your data, don't store it on an Apple server.

This is funny because every server I have worked on in the last 15 years -- and that means a lot -- has gotten regularly port-scanned and other penetration attempts from Chinese IP addresses. EVERY ONE of them.

Comment Re:What's the problem... (Score 1) 92

Then China can, and will, close the server farms in China. Or arrest the managers in China for the equivalent of "contempt of court".

Just as easily as Apple can, and will, pull its jobs back out of China. Which, it should be noted, support some of the largest and most successfull businesses in the country.

Apple can afford to do it. If it wants.

Comment Re:What's the problem... (Score 1) 92

I think you're really a special kind of stupid.

I think we'll let others decide that.

First of all, a company doing business in a country must respect and obey the laws of said country. That goes without even saying, moron. Apple has registered subsidiaries in China, nevermind their huge manufacturing sourcing business in mainland.

Show me where there is a law saying that Apple must store its encryption keys on-shore. Guess what? There isn't one. See, Apple isn't breaking the law because it isn't IN China, it just does business there. But there's more to this... very much more.

As for "gradually been bringing its manufacturing back home" this means you are too stupid to cross the street. No consumer IT / electronics company in the US, Apple included, can bring manufacturing back to the US

Yeah? How about this? And this? And this? And this?

And many, many more. Hmmm. It seems just maybe I knew a bit more about it than you, eh?

Comment Re:What's the problem... (Score 1) 92

You still aren't getting it. The whole point here is that unlike Chinese citizens, Apple does not have to ask for permission to store its encryption keys offshore. It can store them anywhere it damned well pleases. And if the Chinese government doesn't like that, well, they can just close down those companies that work for Apple. Which... coincidence? I think not... are some of the largest, most successful businesses in China.

Comment Re:Is this really a surprise (Score 1) 97

You do? I don't understand why. I think we're in agreement. I wasn't being sarcastic.

Yes, I think we are in agreement. I just thought your comment was awkwardly worded.

Let me think...Thomas Paine style classical liberalism? No, not that...

Um... just no. The press which follows the current administration (which means most of it) has been spouting pretty much the OPPOSITE of "classical liberalism", which today is called libertarian.

Comment Re: What's the problem... (Score 1) 92

Are you retarded? Do you have any idea how much the Chinese market is worth to Apple? Here's a clue: http://www.forbes.com/sites/gr...

THE END MARKET is what Apple is going for. Screw the Chinese government. What they're doing is in the interest of the Chinese CUSTOMER.

And if you don't see that, then let's talk again about who's retarded.

Comment Re:What's the problem... (Score 1) 92

This is about end-users, not manufacturing. Even if Apple managed to completely move all of their manufacturing to the U.S. they wouldn't want to lose all the possible end-users of their products in China.

Yes it is, and that's precisely where you're getting it wrong.

"End users" in China don't want the government to control their information. This is the 21st Century. They're not fucking stupid.

Comment Re:What's the problem... (Score 1) 92

No, that's just marketing. They can just order Apple to decrypt the data since Apple has the keys. Their location doesn't matter since the data is in the country already.

What a silly-assed thing to say. Sure, they could order it. And Apple could completely ignore them. Big fucking deal.

Guess what? Apple has been gradually been bringing its manufacturing back home. If China pressed them, they'd just do it quicker.

Comment Re:distance, please (Score 1) 93

Only when you look at it from an immediate perspective. Yes it's a big investment but doing incremental copper equipment upgrades every few years is too, the small upgrades just allows them to pass the cost onto the customers over a long period of time.

No, and this is the crux of the point. What do you consider "every few years"? Cable around here hasn't been upgraded in any significant way for AT LEAST 10 years, and I know damned well that the (big name) ISP has no plans to do it soon.

BECAUSE it costs so much.

Comment Re:What's the problem... (Score 1, Interesting) 92

Apple's statement that its move is to "improve speed and reliability" is clearly bullshit, in light of the recent Chinese government demand that such data be stored in-country. So much is clear and obvious.

However, Apple should be given huge kudos if their claim that they store it encrypted, and that the encryption keys are offshore, is correct. If so, it's a brilliant move. Eat that, China!

Slashdot Top Deals

One small step for man, one giant stumble for mankind.

Working...