The benefits NEVER outweigh the risks.
I stand by the statement, taking the selfies was an optional choice, and of course the only way to stop nude selfies from leaking, is not to take them. Video chat, disposable cameras, and numeorus other ways to do it exist if you are interested in minimizing risk. She and the others were lazy and thought they were safe.
Also, there is no luck. What we call luck is actually statistically probability. As for JLaw's excuse, that healthy relationship wasn't healthy. There is a little thing people forget called self control. You know that thing where you don't look at anyone at all and be patient. That if sificant other isnt there you don't do anything? That thing that existed for centuries.
. As for her, she could have mailed actual pictures via secure mail. And she assumes that texting them was more secure? There is no security on the internet nor privacy. There is just how hard it is to break into it. And apple loves security by obscurity.
She's angry they got released and knows no one will get punished. She knows they damaged her image and destroyed her wholesomeness. The question I ask is this: Why is her having naked pictures of herself (or of the celebs) a bad thing?
http://abcnews.go.com/Primetim...
Pornography has grown into a $10 billion business — bigger than the NFL, the NBA and Major League Baseball combined — and some of the nation's best-known corporations are quietly sharing the profits. According to Adult Video News, an estimated 11,000 hard-core porn movies are produced in the United States annually, many of them in California's San Fernando Valley, where modern porn was born.
The fappening didn't damage her image in the slightest. The vanity fair article did. It made her look foolish, naive and clueless. My wish now is that no one is ever caught.
