There are now at least five Mystery Science Theater 3000 episodes up on Hulu! They are "The Starfighters (Mike)," "Secret Agent Super Dragon (Joel)," "Monster A-Go-Go (Joel)," "The Rebel Set (Joel)," and "The Giant Gila Monster (Joel)." Could we be lucky enough to enjoy the rest of MST3K on Hulu in the future?

Like a lot of countries, Australia doesn't quite know what to make of Scientologists. Okay, some Aussies just can't stand 'em. Australia's Daily Telegraph sends about an effort called Youth for Human Rights, a thinly veiled Scientologist front launched to teach kids about human rights. So, if L. Ron Hubbard (scifi author and founder of the Church of Scientology) made your list of Human Rights leaders, where would you put him? This "informative" resource puts him ahead of Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. I little bit of legwork casts more evidence of Youth for Human Rights real motives. With a whois turning up registration at 1332 L Ron Hubbard Way. Are you familiar with that address? Xenu-Directory is. So what's the problem? Well, these videos and booklets are being distributed and aimed at Year 6 students and there's absolutely no indication in the material that this is linked to the Church of Scientology. In fact, a warning has gone out to not use any of these materials inside the classroom. Perhaps Australia's inquiry by Senator Xenu ... I mean Xenophon into the CoS is long overdue and it's time everyone look more closely at their international efforts.

Back in 2007, Slashdot covered a story about Media Rights Technology suing everyone for not implementing DRM. Ha ha, weird right? Okay, fast forward to today and it looks like BlueBeat.com (owned by MRT) is under a lot of fire for selling Beatles tunes and I'll bet EMI is having a field day with that. Most interesting about that is that "The ID3 tags of the Beatles songs sold on BlueBeat.com list âoe2009 BlueBeat.comâ as the copyright holder." Okay, that's another topic entirely.

My question is simple though ... what is going on with BlueBeat.com? BlueBeat offers a large selection of MP3s for 25 cents (only 160 kbps though) and you can stream entire albums as many times as you want on their site. So I began my investigative googling looking for MRT to be owned by someone in Germany or Russia and to be completely illegal in the US. But it seems to be a legit operation out of Santa Cruz, CA. So what gives? I mean, BlueBeat has the same crazy terms of service that iTunes does which they can change at anytime but there are so many things wrong with this picture:

1. A music service undercutting everyone else by 75%.
2. A DRM-less product from a company that initially sued everyone for not using DRM -- a company called Media Rights Technology!
3. You can stream whatever you want from the site, whole albums or songs!
4. The company doing this is in the United States of America. Where individuals are fined to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars for sharing songs. What then, does BlueBeat imagine will happen to them legally?

So what am I missing here? Has MRT lost it? Is this a marketing tactic where they receive a DMCA take down, adhere to it and send e-mails to users asking them to delete their MP3s as their ToS says they can do? And from there just keep hosting songs that labels are too lazy to DMCA away? Something stinks but if you bought 100 songs for 25 dollars from BlueBeat and then kept using them, who would be breaking the law? You or BlueBeat?

We've discussed Eastern District of Texas court in more than a few stories about patent cases. To illustrate what kind of problem we're talking about here, a local Legal Journal has given us last week's review of cases filed in regards to patents in Eastern District of Texas.

They include:

• Aircraft Technical Publishers vs. Avantext Inc. et al which entails 'the reproduction of computer-based information and data concerning the airworthiness requirements and other directives relating to non-commercial aircraft.'
• Realtime Data LLC dba IXO vs. Morgan Stanley et al which entails 'the rights to four U.S. patents relating to data compression.' (6,624,761, 7,161, 506, 7,400,274, 7,417,568)
• SFA Systems LLC vs. 1-800-Flowers.com Inc. et al which entails an Integrated Computerized Sales Force Automation System. And how do you infringe on that? 'By making and using supply chain methods, sales methods, sales systems, marketing methods, marketing systems and inventory systems.' SFA claims, "As a result of the above Defendants' infringement of the '525 Patent, SFA has suffered monetary damages ... in an amount not yet determined, and will continue to suffer such monetary damages in the future unless Defendants' infringing activities are permanently enjoined by this court," the complaint states."

Three cases every week should clog up the system. One has to wonder at the number of case titles ending with "et al" and also in relationship to software patents. A patent system that allows patents for data compression combined with Eastern District of Texas Court might be what we need for this powder keg to ignite and the power drunken sot that is the USPTO admit it has a problem.

Stanislaw Lem was arguably the greatest non-English science fiction writer before his death three years ago and left behind many science fiction novels with messages of satire and intrigue. The Futurological Congress is no different. The book has several motifs throughout it but I found the most prominent to be that we are living in an increasingly medicated society whereby the future may be wonderfully dystopian--in that the horrors of our existence are simply hidden by drugs on top of drugs on top of drugs. With a movie due out shortly by director Ari Folman, it seems like a good time to revisit this often overlooked short classic sci-fi work.

Our hero and narator, Ijon Tichy should be a familiar name to Lem fans or anyone familiar with Lem's Space Diaries in either English or Polish. Tichy acts as a mechanism of sanity in many of Lem's novels just trying to figure out what the devil is up with a messed up planet he lands on or a particular device/person. By this manner, Lem allows himself much discovery on the reader's behalf and by these means can relay the current state of events to the reader without jarringly interrupting the natural flow of things too much. Through this novel's course of Tichy's discoveries, I was suspended from being disturbed by spoon fed explanations most of the time but the word play that occurred in this particular story got to be a bit much and tedious for a sub-150-page paperback hence a missing point in its score.

Tichy is now a member of the Futurological Association and is invited to attend the Eighth Futurological Congress in Nounas, Costa Rica. From the get go, Lem is full of satire with the immediate lampooning of such self-appointed associations (and maybe even academia) by pointing out that there are two kinds of individuals in these associations: the ones that attend every single meeting/conference and those that don't leave their offices period.

One of the themes throughout the book is a borderline anti-American sentiment about the development of munitions and bombs. I'm familiar with Lem's ability to criticize both sides of the Cold War in a single paragraph although The Futurological Congress seems to focus more heavily on American military and pharmaceutical faults. Lem must have been well aware of kidnappings in Latin America when he wrote this book because that's one aspect he got right about the future of that area. Due to heavy activist presence in Costa Rica trying to capture and ransom Americans, a military attache is accompanying the U.S. Ambassador to Costa Rica to speak at the congress but in the middle of his speech an unfortunate delegate from India reaches into his breast pocket to grab a handkerchief to wipe his nose. This delegate standing next to Tichy is immediately dispensed with by the bodyguards of the ambassador and, thanks to 'humanitarian ballistics,' Tichy only gets a spattering of blood on him instead of the bullet passing through the target and injuring more people.

Some background on Lem may help you understand this satire. He was born a Catholic Pole with Jewish ancestry and seemed to run the gauntlet of oppression. He survived World War II with fake papers as a mechanic/welder and due to his "bourgeois origin" could not study at the Polytechnic during Soviet occupation of Eastern Poland after the end of the war. He became an Atheist stating, "for moral reasons ... the world appears to me to be put together in such a painful way that I prefer to believe that it was not created ... intentionally." Knowing this, his satire and bitter critique of all things may not surprise you. On his way to the conference--aside from meeting an orgy of liberated publishers--he encounters an 'anti-papist' who is a Catholic on his way to kill the Pope with a gun of a massive caliber. The anti-papist's surprising motive is none other than The Holy Bible where Abraham is ordered to kill his son Isaac by God. Except that the anti-papist would be killing a father, the most holiest father. And this would be a great personal sacrifice and the "utmost of martyrdom" as the anti-papist "would suffer terrible torment and his soul eternal damnation." Again, Lem predicts today's world, we have no limit of people eager to misinterpret scriptures of any religion.

Back to the conference--since there's 168 attendees from 64 different countries, each person gets four minutes to present their paper. And everyone is only really interested in their own work and telling everyone else about it in a bit of a narcissistic way. This leads the first member to spend his four minutes thusly:

The Futurologists in this novel are probably best described as each one being a less optimistic Ray Kurzweil in that they all seem to be spouting their own version of obstacles humanity is soon to face and consequently their ideas to remedy it. For instance the second delegate from Japan unveils a 10,000:1 model of a housing complex some 800 stories tall with self sustaining everything and mobile in the ocean! It's the future! In fact, everything is recycled! Even the food is recycled waste and excrement from the people. The sausage left out in the hall is actually reconstituted human waste (at which point everyone in the audience stops eating and shuffles the food underneath their seats). This sets the tone for a few of the minor themes of the novel and gives you an idea of how Lem takes subtle jabs at everyone. For example another United States delegate takes the floor to talk about population problems that are rapidly developing. He outlines seven solutions: "mass media and mass arrests, compulsory celibacy, full-sale deeroticization, onanization, sodomization, and for repeated offenders--castration." The book makes other references to population control and one character notes that continuing trends of population would eventually result in human beings exploding outward at the speed of light. Nature is addressed in an equally hilarious means as later in the book all animals have been extinct and replaced with what appear to be better controlled robots.

While in his room, Tichy makes the mistake of drinking the water and discovers that the water is spiked with a powerful hallucinogenic drug. He assumes it's the work of the revolutionaries and decides not to tell anyone but as the violence outside escalates and he mentions it to a fellow futurologist, he discovers that it is the rise of chryptochemocracy! With the hotel's staff, he quickly equips a gas mask as it becomes clear that chemical warfare is afoot ... of a psychedelic nature. Planes are called in equiped with LTN bombs. LTN stands for "Love Thy Neighbor" which is pretty indicative of today's munitions and their goals with surgical strikes. Hilariously enough, the very hotel in which the congress is convening is immediately bombed by mistake.

After pages of chemical warfare that affect the crowd's temperament and counter chemicals that affect the crowd's temperament, Tichy and a friend find oxygen tanks and masks and descend to the sewers where the hotel staff is relaxing comfortably with their own oxygen tanks and masks.

Unfortunately, Tichy and his companion do not have enough oxygen to last the night and therefore must take shifts suffering hallucinations. What follows from this point is a series of hallucinations that Tichy has ending in him coming to in the sewer. Tichy has several of these bizarre hallucinations ending in him being shot by revolutionaries in the sewer. He comes to certain that he is still hallucinating and refuses to believe anyone he is not. As a result, they freeze him until they can find a cure for his mental illness and he is unthawed many years later in a reality where 'psychemicals' keep everyone happy. This overmedicated society disgusts and frightens Tichy at times. It has gotten so bad that a company now exists where you can order a psychem that allows you the satisfaction of doing evil upon another person. Murder's no longer a problem, you just get reanimated. The worst possible offense is using psychems on an individual without their consent.

Tichy attempts to adapt and I couldn't help but be reminded of Fry in Futurama with similar humor employed nearly thirty years before it. As Tichy reconnects with his futurologist friend (people stopped dying as technology caught up a la Kurzweil), he discovers something unsettling about the drugs everyone is taking. He discovers that there's mascons that act as blockers to your senses and replace it with a superficial reality. And we start to understand why everything is so mysteriously idyllic while at the same times animals have been extinct for many years and the planet is at an overburdening 26 billion people. Tichy's friend hands him two vials that will unblock the layers of mascons. You see, the 'architects' of this current psychem reality have patched and repatched side effects of psychems and mascons with more psychems and mascons in the air and water supply! I'll leave The Matrix-like vials and harsh transition from utopia to dystopia for people interested in reading the book.

This book was a joy to read and although the very end is a bit dissatisfying to me, the satire and pessimism inherent to Lem's writings have influenced me and continue to influence me heavily. I like to think that Lem borrowed from sci-fi writers like Philip K. Dick and that other science fiction authors like Douglas Adams have borrowed from Lem despite the language barrier and difference in culture. While Lem may not be the icon that Lovecraft, Clarke and Asimov have become, I certainly hope that people recognize his large corpus of works for more than just Solaris as I've enjoyed many novels by him. Lem offers a rare dark comedy in science fiction with The Futurological Congress.

You can pick up the English version of The Futurological Congress at Amazon . And catch the Ari Folman movie where the present day will be live action while the unfathomable future will be animated to adapt to the stark impossibilities the book portrays.

Sometimes I get fan mail and sometimes I get really awesome hate mail. Today, a man by the name of Steve Stephenson (also sent from blappo@gmail.com) at www.ecinstall.com decided to send me three pieces of mail despite my lack of response:

Yeah, I was wrong, I would like to send my apologies to Steve Stephenson who is employed at ecinstall.com and can be reached at sstephenson@ecinstall.com.

I was confused with his publisher, I am completely straightened out thanks to your extreme language. You, truly, you sir are the epitome of "intelligent discourse" as yo put it. Never have I matched wits with someone so intelligent. I only wish more people like you would send me mail so I could finally decide to stop visiting Slashdot when I am bored.

It amazes me that Slashdot would allow an ad like this one to run on the front page of Slashdot. You know you're a credible news source when right below your headlines is "Barack the Magic Negro (Offensive?)"

Guess those trolls are willing to pay top dollar to get through to the Slashdot crowd these days. I guess if it pays the bills it's ok.

I have a large music collection. Well over two thousand compact discs. I have also over the course of many years transferred them to a high quality lossy MP3 format--with impeccable ID3 tags. Given the recent news of Wikipedia preparing for a media explosion, I thought about exercising the fair use doctrine and may begin to methodically upload Ogg snippets of these songs--30 seconds or 10% of the length of the song (which ever is shorter). I could probably divide my music into three groups:

1. Music with historical significance--a very small group.
2. Music with no historical significance although popular enough that people may be interested in hearing samples of it--a very very large group.
3. Music with not only no historical significance but so obscure that no one could ever possibly care--a decent amount (example Zager & Evans' In the Year 2525 (Exordium & Terminus) album).

So before I start this endeavor and devote a lot of time to it, I have been trying to find the answers to a few questions you might be able to help me with: Will all of this be torn down? Just from group 3? Just from group 2? Does Wikipedia care about the "encyclopedic worthiness" of audio files? If there is a page for a fairly obscure album like Thunder, Lightning, Strike by The Go! Team, would they like clips from every track on the album or just the popular tracks like "Huddle Formation?"

All the info I can find out there seems to be photo oriented and revolve around license disputes when marked for deletion ... but I feel I am sitting on a large volume of music and could spend some extra time carefully documenting it on Wikipedia for everyone's benefit. Is it worth my time or will I face an epic culling (like the anima/manga fans) in the future once word gets out about it?

For those MST3K fans out there who have adapted to Rifftrax, there is a Rifftrax Live Online Free Event tomorrow in which you can watch the crew riff live. It takes place 9pm Eastern/6pm Pacific. Afterward they will take some Q&A live from the audience.

You might recall the article from Sunday about the cost of Google's search engine on the environment. Well, the physicist that did the original research is revealing that he made no such conclusions in his research. "I have no idea where they got those statistics," he is quoted as saying. This article takes answers from him and Google on the Times Online article that was stretching his research into the realm of fiction.

You may wonder what exactly happens to a site when Slashdot sends its legions of page requests to it. Well, The Metric System blog has an analysis of what happened on November 6th when they received 31,218 page views. You see the breakdown by site and you also see an increase in traffic by 89,094%. While this may by anecdotal, it's the first time I've seen hard numbers on the Slashdot/Digg effect.

One of my favorite series has released its third movie, "Bender's Game." Wired has an interview with some staff from Rough Draft Studios (The Simpson's Movie, Ren & Stimpy) that was entertaining. Get out and buy Futurama to support the show!

Obama was brutally attacked by MPAA lobbyists mere hours after his acceptance speech today. Who else is already pandering to the president elect?

I came across an interesting article by D. J. Bernstein about the IPv6 Mess. In the article, Bernstein raises several interoperability challenges for organizations who would be interested in migrating to IPv6, which potentially make it expensive and difficult to begin deploying IPv6 on the Internet alongside of IPv4.

Read More for a discussion of how I think some of these problems might be resolved.

The basic problem is that hosts configured with only IPv4 cannot talk to other hosts using only IPv6, and hosts running only IPv6 cannot talk to hosts running only IPv4. Because of this, all servers continue to need to use IPv4 in addition to IPv6, and so do all end-users. If you are using IPv4 anyhow, there never comes a point where you can transition to IPv6-only. In order for a transition to be possible at all, we need the ability for interoperability between the two protocols.

I have been wondering, is there any reason why a router/gateway device at the 'border' between an end-user, corporate, or ISP network could not act as a bi-directional 'bridge' between IPv4 and IPv6? That is, a device which accomplishes 2 basic functions: it maps IPv6 public addresses to IPv4 addresses (either public or private addresses, as appropriate), and it supports DNS queries which treat IPv6 numeric addresses as DNS domain names (maybe something where you replace colons with periods, replace the double-colon shorthand-notation with a special placeholder, like .xx., and perhaps put a special tld at the end, e.g. 2002:abcd:efgh:0001::1 becomes 2002.abcd.ef01.0001.xx.1.ip6 [are there currently any RFCs for a representation of an IPv6 address as a DNS name?]).

This system would be based on a sort of NAT, and a cooperating IPv4 DNS and DHCP server.

In typical usage, currently, NAT devices have a one-to-many relationship with the hosts inside the NAT. That is, typically, the NAT router has 1 public IP address, and multiple internal addresses. Is there any reason why a NAT server couldn't do many-to-many mapping?

When an IPv4 device connects to the network and makes a DHCP request, it would be given a version 4 address, IPv4 default gateway address, and IPv4 DNS Server address(es) as in normal DHCP usage currently. The DHCP server would register the newly leased IPv4 address with the NAT gateway, which would create an IPv6 corresponding address. The IPv6 address would serve as the main address for the IPv4 device behind the NAT, for any hosts on the Internet which use IPv6. So, now, the IPv4 'legacy' device can receive in-bound IPv6 connections, with the necessary translation between IPv6 and IPv4 being done by the gateway, so that the IPv4 device doesn't even know it's talking to an IPv6 peer, and vice-versa.

The cool trick here, for outbound connections, is that the NAT device could, I think, create mappings in the other direction too:

Consider some scenarios:

1) You have legacy devices (like a Tivo, Cell phone w/ Wifi, XBox/Playstation/Wii, etc) or applications (and so you need to configure your PC with IPv4 for the legacy app) which are not IPv6 compatible, but your network/ISP and the Internet at large has migrated to IPv6. The device or application uses DNS to resolve a name to an IP address (that is, in this scenario, no literal IPv4 address is trying to be resolved, but just a 'normal' dns entry like slashdot.org, or possibly one of the .ip6 entries as described above). Is there a way to allow the legacy devices or applications to still function?

      In this situation, my idea is that the following would occur: The IPv4 request is made to the DNS Server, but the DNS Server only is able to get an AAAA record for the server (which is for IPv6 addresses), but no A record (for IPv4 address). The DNS Server then makes a request to the the NAT to map the IPv6 external address to an IPv4 address internally. The NAT that sets up such a mapping using private network addresses which are not reserved by local policy for internal hosts (that is, maybe for your internal hosts, you are using 192.168.*.*, which leaves 10.*.*.* unused, and so available for this 'mapping'), so for example, the NAT adds an entry in the NAT tables that 10.0.1.14 maps to the IPv6 address 1234:abcd:ef01:1111::5 (NOTE that the IPv6 address might be for an external host *or* an internal host which is using IPv6 inside the LAN).

      The NAT then replies back to the DNS Server to use 10.0.1.14 for that IPv6 entry, which replies back to the legacy device with the mapped internal address of 10.0.1.14, and the DNS Server caches the IPv4 address for future lookups (temporarily; such caching should expire after some time if that DNS entry has not been referenced, and the NAT should also expire the mapping after the same amount of time, so that a different IPv6 host can be mapped to that private IP address).

      So, now the legacy device(s) attempts to open a connection to the server using the IP address it got back from DNS, which is the 10.0.1.14 address. The gateway device sees that the connection is for one of the 'mapped' addresses, and does the necessary NAT and routing to move the traffic back-and-forth between the IPv4 device, and the IPv6 device. This all happens *completely transparently* to the IPv6 host and the internal IPv4 host.

2) Similar to the above scenario, except no DNS query is performed; the app or device instead tries to connect to a hard-coded IPv4 address:

      In this scenario, if the hard-coded IPv4 address is for another IPv4 device which isn't on the local network, then perhaps the gateway could map the IPv4 address (as long as it isn't one of the non-routable address blocks) to an IPv6 address which embeds the IPv4 address.

      I've heard of something called 6to4 which is a way of carrying IPv6 traffic over the IPv4 Internet without using an explicit tunnel, which used a similar concept of embedding an IPv4 address into an IPv6 address. I don't see why a similar approach couldn't be used for allowing IPv6 hosts and gateways to connect to IPv4 hosts across the backbone. The packets would be carried as far as necessary as IPv6 packets, then translated back into IPv4 packets by a gateway server somewhere, when it transitions from the 6Bone to an IPv4 network.

3) You have legacy devices inside your network (maybe servers), which need to receive in-bound connections from an external IPv6 host.

      Since the legacy device's internal IPv4 address was mapped to a public IPv6 address when it received a DHCP lease, external hosts can make a connection to the public IPv6 address, and the gateway does the necessary NAT to pass the traffic to the internal IPv4 address, transparently to both the external and internal host.

      In conclusion, it seems to me that a strategy like what I've described should, I think, make it possible to allow the 'core' of the Internet (backbones and ISPs) to begin upgrading to IPv6 without breaking IPv4 devices. Then, you can begin upgrading 'edge' networks. Is there any reason why this wouldn't work, or wouldn't work well? Are people already doing this, and I'm just not aware of it (I tried googling information for IPv4 to IPv6 transition, and didn't see anything like this, though my research was only brief, and definitely not exhaustive)?

        Note: This all might sound pretty complicated, but I think that something like this could be included in 'home broadband' gateway devices from companies like linksys/cicso, d-link, netgear, etc, already configured for users so that it 'just works'. I think such routers could take care of this automatically. It might not even be necessary for users to install such a device at home - this 'bridging', it seems to me, could probably be done by ISPs.

    The only limitation I can think of at the moment, is that the ISPs would need to make sure they didn't try to service too many users with one gateway - because of the fact that you would be mapping IPv6 addresses to private addresses like 10.x.x.x, you are limited to how many mappings can be maintained by any given gateway at any given time, but I think that as long as you don't have a large number of users, there's enough normally unused addresses in 10.x.x.x and 192.168.*.* to allow for mapping a large number of IPv6 to IPv4 addresses. Even though the Internet needs Billions of addresses, I think it likely that a small set of users will only ever be connecting to a few thousand or tens of thousands of those hosts at any given time, so the approx 16.7 million private addresses in the 10.*.*.* network should, in most cases, be sufficient, I think.

From the mouth of John Cleese, it's official: Sarah Palin is funnier than Michael Palin!