Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Spherical cows (Score 1) 162

Cringely cites estimates that 40,000 satellites would be enough to serve every Internet user on Earth, as well as IoT devices and even future as-yet-uninvented network services.

Hmm, is that 8 billion people spread evenly over the planet, or does that take into account high density cities? Because everything I've heard about Starlink is that it won't work in cities where the population density is too high for the number of satellites that can serve a single area, so that's ~50% of the world's population ruled out straight away.

Comment Re:Good (Score 1) 209

Yes Stallman has done something wrong. He puts his foot in it and then refuses to learn from it every single time. And then his whinging and blaming everyone else makes other people behave worse. The amount of tech posters I've seen falling over themselves to defend him by coming up with the most tortured straw-men arguments, and even outright lying about the situation, is completely embarrassing.

Stallman is a grown man, if he's going to refuse to learn how to make statements in public then he can face the consequences of his posts.

Comment Re:What this tempest is about (Score 3, Interesting) 209

That is not the statement the triggered the controversy. That is him doubling down on it.

This is his statement:

The injustice is in the word “assaulting”. The term “sexual assault”
is so vague and slippery that it facilitates accusation inflation:
taking claims that someone did X and leading people to think of it as
Y, which is much worse than X.

The accusation quoted is a clear example of inflation. The reference
reports the claim that Minsky had sex with one of Epstein’s harem.
Let’s presume that was true (I see no reason to disbelieve it).

The word “assaulting” presumes that he applied force or violence, in
some unspecified way, but the article itself says no such thing.
Only that they had sex.

We can imagine many scenarios, but the most plausible scenario is that
she presented herself to him as entirely willing. Assuming she was
being coerced by Epstein, he would have had every reason to tell her
to conceal that from most of his associates.

I’ve concluded from various examples of accusation inflation that it
is absolutely wrong to use the term “sexual assault” in an accusation.

Whatever conduct you want to criticize, you should describe it with a
specific term that avoids moral vagueness about the nature of the
criticism.

Call Epstein's victims a "harem" is nasty. Trying to excuse the victimization of a trafficking victim because they were forced to present themselves as "willing" is nasty. The argument that there is nothing wrong with a 70 year old man having sex with an underage girl who just happens to be at his friend's private island is fine as long as they don't ask any awkward questions like who this underage girl is, is nasty. Then doubling down by whinging about the legal definition of rape in the Virgin islands is nasty.

Stallman is a grown man, he's done this kind of thing enough times and if he is not willing to learn how to make the tech industry not sound so bloody nasty then he should not be putting himself in such a public position.

Comment Re:Perspective (Score 1) 233

Maybe if the Boring Company had actually lowered the cost of tunneling then the cost of CAHSR's mountain crossings would be much lower? Maybe if Musk had heralded the need for high-speed rail instead of hyperloop there would be more public interest creating higher potential ridership and thus more interest in commercial sponsorship of high speed rail projects? Maybe if Musk had held high-speed rail competitions instead of hyperloop competitions we would have got something useful out of it?

All Musk has done on public transit so far is to distract from actual solutions.

Comment Re:Perspective (Score 5, Insightful) 233

TBC has somehow captured the imagination of a lot of people

Yeah, but the problem is now it's turned out to be complete garbage people are going to be like "Hur hur we told you public transit SUCKS! Just build moar roads DUH!". And that is going to stick in a lot of people's minds.

I guess what I'm saying is, of course the first commercial project isn't going to be spectacular

Underground mass transit technology is over 150 years old. If your first commercial project is worse than something from the late 1800's then that's not a visionary move to push technology forward, it's an arrogant move that is holding progress on actual solutions back.

It's the same with hyperloop, in the same time that Musk has been going on about how easy it is China has covered their entire country in high speed rail. Musk's clearly unrealistic pet projects are holding public transit back by distracting from the solutions we have right now.

Comment Re:Design of the helicopter (Score 4, Informative) 34

It said it moved away from Ingenuity but it hasn't yet made it's first flight, so it's more like a flying rover

Ingenuity is just the copter, Perseverance is the main rover. So the copter didn't move, Perseverance did. Solar panel is indeed on top.

Is there any reason it doesn't just always dock with (Perseverance) and essentially utilize it for it's power supply

Given the rotor turns at 2400 rpm I think they want it to be as far away from Perseverance as possible in case they've got their calculations on powered flight on Mars wrong and it loses control, those carbon fiber blades could easily shred important cables on the rover.

It's only really a tech demonstrator with no real function in the mission beyond seeing if a drone on Mars is a practical idea, no doubt if it works a future mission will have something more like a quadcopter with ducted blades that can safely dock with a main rover and take off when needed to perform surveys or other scientific studies.

Comment Re:I dug deeper into this... (Score 1) 350

The thing is though, Stallman argued that it should not be called assault as long as the victim "presented herself to him as entirely willing". As Stallman's only alternative to assault or rape is just "they had sex", I can only conclude Stallman thinks in that hypothetical situation Minsky did nothing wrong.

Do you agree that a 70 year old would have no culpability if they victimize a sex trafficking victim by going to their friend's private island and having sex with some random teenager as long as they don't ask any awkward questions like who this teenager is, is she a vulnerable young person or a victim of trafficking, or even if she is above the age of consent?

Comment Re:I dug deeper into this... (Score 1) 350

I don't know, but when and where I come from, "Sorry you were hurt" is actually itself the standard non-apology.

To say sorry for causing hurt is to say "Sorry I caused hurt". The I bit is the real apology because it shows you understand you did something wrong, not the other person is wrong for misunderstanding, or being hurt etc.

First off, I'm not even sure what you think makes him that right now: because he's one of several people on the board? He's not the chairman of the board, he's not the president (Geoffrey Knauth is), he's not the executive director (John Sullivan is). Could you explain what you mean here?

He is by far the highest profile person on the board, a powerful and privileged position to be. If he wasn't on the board or other formal positions of power than even with his name all over the original documents the FSF would have some distance from him when he continues to mouth off stupid comments. Instead they brought him back and now he's again perceived as leading the organization.

Comment Re:"scaring away the women" (Score 4, Insightful) 640

no matter how hard he tries

He's been told for decades yet still makes the same screw-ups over and over. If he doesn't want to try to change then that's fine, but then he has to accept that makes him terrible at the job of being a public figurehead for an organization that is growing ever more important now that mass tech consumership is mainstream, and move to a behind the scene's role so someone else who is better at that job can fill that role.

Slashdot Top Deals

Pascal is not a high-level language. -- Steven Feiner

Working...