I am amazed at how many new cars, less than 5 years old, including some 2021 models are listed as having 3G. I be pissed if my 3 year old car lost connectivity

This always seemed like a bad idea and poor focus of resources for their small operation. They spent a lot of time and effort on this while other navigation apps dramatically improved their base experience. I hope they can regain some focus as Apple Maps has made great improvements recently and has really given them a run for their money I view in driving experience. And we all know Google Maps is just leaching data off Waze users/editors.

The title is a little misleading as this is studying the predominantly dominant strand found in Europe and North America, its been around for 4-5 months.

I suggest the neurological development questions be referred to the medical professionals. We all want our kids to be proficient with technology but there is plenty of time for that. Donâ(TM)t rush things because once the cat is out of the bag it never is going back in.

Washington Post at least cited the study of London Taxi drivers done almost 20 years ago.

Crowdsource, I am sure there are many Amateur Radio Operators out there and others who would be interested in supporting your efforts

I work in healthcare and the model often used is Brenners Novice to Expert. This looks at the development of an individual in their practice. While a great model since it allows one to compare themselves to themselves and looking for improvement, it also promotes team work. Of course this is a little difficult to apply many software firms. Another model is using a 1-5 scale, where 5 is exceptional, 1 is unsatistifactory, 3 meets criteria, 4 is exceeds criteria, and then they tally these for whatever metrics used and divide to get an average. Comparing staff to each other does not develop team work and only works in competitive environments like sales where you want people to outdo each other.

But the challenge is what people consider acceptable, you may have misclassified 100 people right now but there are plenty of people out there that would argue that if you stop one terrorist or criminal it may be worth the "inconvenience" endured by 1%

Think about how much raw power computers have today, and how for the most part we are just using that for word processing/email/internet/music/video. This is just an example of how to utilize this power. Its all about software now, this is just another example of how databases will continue to interact more and more. There are great possibilities for how this can be used (and horrible options as well) but think about medicine being able to identify a John Doe who is brought into the Emergency Department, or your home security system identifying who is knocking at the door. And of course, this technology is not new, its just finally coming out for public usage.

Still skeptical on this one, nothing new and just a shiny interface for basically already existing services. And the facebook.com email address I feel will be a bad idea as it will confuse brand from its employees.

The challenge with this analysis is that it only focuses on a small component of the overall economy. The apple iPod is a great example of this, and areas where the US can develop and market these high tech items we can assemble them oversees as ultimately we will make the profit back here in the US. The challenge is that there are many elements of the economy that based soley on manufacturing and this is an area where China has an advantage. Also many companies that were historically american have been purchased by oversees holdings. Overall if you look at the flow of money for most parts of the US economy the money ends up in other countries. Ultimately to have a healthy economy you need both high tech and manufacturing balanced appropriately so your companies are not too dependent on other countries. This is where the US suffers the greatest