Never mind that the booster is never in an orbit.

Sure it is! It just happens to be an orbit with a periapsis smaller than the Earth's radius.

Fucking DRM is a whole 'nother problem!

Fuck off, fascist. There's a HUGE FUCKING ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE between a spy agency spying on other countries and it spying on its own citizens.

Not only would I prefer not to see people with negative reputations, but I'd actually prefer to filter on a relative basis in terms of people who are clearly much better than me.

You've got a game theory problem there: why would those better people want to see you?

Why should any random asshat running a website expect to be compensated? It used to be the case -- before the sociopathic marketing droids invaded -- that people put up websites because they wanted to, not because they expected to profit. And the Internet was better that way.

Take off your rose colored glasses for minute. First of all, no-reply emails are a means to notify a customer of something. They are one-way.

I am writing to "notify" you that any business using with this attitude is run by shitty people and deserves to fail. You don't get to dictate what I'm "meant" to do!

Please direct all responses to no-reply@gofuckyourself.com

Sometimes when I have a choice of companies to buy a product from, Ill send an email or fill out the web form asking the same question to multiple companies.

And that's the other asinine thing about bullshit web forms: they force you to send the message to one recipient at a time. As a slightly different example, say I want to write my Congressmen about something. Instead of just writing an email and putting three names in the To: field, now I have to answer a slightly disjoint set of (potentially) invasive questions three times over. It's not that it's hard or even that time-consuming; it's that it's galling because I shouldn't have to jump through hoops like that.

Think about it - if you were running a very large company, would you rather: a) have a catch-all email that runs the gamut of issues, feedback, etc. b) have a way to submit categorized feedback via web forms?

If I were running a very large company, I would want everyone to be forced to just give me their money instead of having to go through the trouble of actually selling something to them in return.

But I wouldn't be entitled to that -- just like how companies are not entitled to be able to dictate communications terms to their customers, either!

Nope. Fuck that class of company too, because it's ultimately the same damn thing. Fundamentally, companies are either willing to engage on the customer's terms... or they aren't. And the latter don't deserve anyone's business.

I like $1.99 apps that have no strings attached.

LOL, as if $1.99 and closed-source weren't strings!

On a real "no-strings-attached" system you can just do:

$ sudo apt-get install youtube-dl
$ youtube-dl [video URL]

I'd call that even easier, since you don't have to screw around with a payment processor.

Firefox in F-Droid is depracated

Why?

A person's civil rights should not change just because they are on one side of an imaginary line or the other. State's right are a vestige of a bygone age, when we couldn't travel across the country in a matter of hours. They have no place in our modern political system..

The conclusion does not follow from the premise. It's true that no government (regardless of level) should have the power to infringe on the rights of the People. But, of the powers that government can have, it is not necessarily true that the Federal government must have all of them instead of only a subset.

In fact, this is exactly what the Tenth Amendment of the US Constitution affirms: that all valid governmental powers (and by "valid" I mean powers which do not infringe on human rights) which are not specifically delegated to the Federal government are instead reserved for State or local governments. In other words (to make a technology analogy to firewalls or ACLs), the Federal government is supposed to operate on a default-deny policy: the Federal government is prohibited from exercising any authority except for the powers explicitly whitelisted in Article 1, Section 8.

Hey, I'd be perfectly happy for this ruling to greatly limit the Interstate Commerce Clause -- if the same reasoning was applied to every other issue too. There are many, many Federal regulations -- including everything from drug prohibition to the Obamacare individual mandate -- that rely on decisions about the scope of the Interstate Commerce Clause that conflict with this one.

So, since this effectively overturns Wickard v. Filburn, the next order of business is abolishing the DEA (since the entire concept of Federal drug prohibition relies on it), right?