Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: here we go again (Score 1) 246

Furthermore, men need jobs more than women do because if a man doesn't have a job, people look down on him. If a woman doesn't have a job and her husband works, nobody looks down on her. It is time we stop denying qualified man who need work jobs so that less qualified females can get them.

The obvious response, then, is to change the social conventions that require a man be the primary breadwinner for a family. There are a number of quality-of-life improvements you could make for men once that was done away with.

Submission + - Vendor tracks LinkedIn profile changes to alert client employers (techtarget.com)

dcblogs writes: IT managers have long had the ability and right to monitor employee behavior on internal networks. Now, HR managers are getting similar capabilities thanks to cloud-based services — but for tracking employee activity outside of their employer's network. A controversy and court fight is swelling over its potential impact on employee privacy.A San Francisco-based startup, hiQ Labs Inc., offers products based on its analysis of publicly available LinkedIn data. One is Keeper, which identifies employees at risk of being recruited away, and another is Skill Mapper, which analyzes employee skills.The profile data is collected by software bots. The clients of hiQ's service may learn whether a LinkedIn member is a flight risk thanks to an individual risk score: high (red), medium (yellow) or low (green), according to court papers. LinkedIn is in court fighting this, but so far it's losing. A federal judge recently took exception to the use of the CFAA in this case "to punish hiQ for accessing publicly available data." The judge warned such an interpretation "could profoundly impact open access to the internet."

Comment Re:Disney (Score 2) 71

Real estate rights are forever, then why not copyright?

For one reason: neither the buildings nor the land they rest upon can be duplicated, let alone for zero cost. Another is that society obtains greater benefit when ideas and works are spread more widely.

Intellectual property law exists solely for the purpose of encouraging individuals to share their works by granting a limited monopoly on them so they can gain monetary benefit from doing so. This is done with the understanding that some non-zero fraction of inventors and artists would refrain from doing so in the absence of this protection. The end goal is to maximize the spread of ideas.

The problem is that people do not all agree as to how long various intellectual property protections should last in order to accomplish this goal.

When it comes to discoveries and inventions, larger proportions of them now require teams rather than individuals and large amounts of resources. The entities now predominantly holding ownership of these properties are functionally immortal, hold large influence over the lawmaking process, and arguably care little for the societal benefit of eventually releasing ideas into the public domain. This is further complicated by the growing realization that intellectual property protections can also serve to substantially hinder the birth and spread of new ideas.

Comment Re:The solution: the cloud!!! (Score 2) 498

Thats how google masters know which companies to buy and sell and the government does have to hack your system they force you to use theirs oops I mean Google Drive/OneDrive/Dropbox

Surely the implication is that the data was encrypted first. You can (and should!) encrypt your data before putting it up in the cloud.

Comment Re:I thought unemployment was in the double digits (Score 1) 389

The only thing the BLS job numbers are intended for is tracking the state of the economy, not the state of people's lifestyles. Pundits and politicians (from all parties) like to confuse the issue for their own ends, but that's really all there is to it. The job numbers tell you how many people are able to find jobs. If you want to know whether the jobs are good or not, you'll have to look at other data sets that align with your definition of a "good" job.

Were every working adult in the country suddenly transitioned to minimum wage jobs overnight, surely you would agree it reflects a change in state of the economy. Arguably, then, using a trinary value such as "has a job", "does not have a job but looking for one", and "does not have a job and not looking for another" is insufficient at tracking the current state of the economy.

Comment Re:please do this for all places (Score 3, Insightful) 440

This is the Lump of Labor Fallacy. There is not a fixed number of jobs in the economy, and eliminating a particular job does not mean "one less job".

I think you mean that it doesn't necessarily mean one less job. There is a possibility it means that. For example, the business could pocket the extra profit and hoard it rather than reinvest.

Either way, someone will have more money in their pocket, and will spend that money on other goods, services or investments, generating jobs elsewhere in the economy.

As stated above: there is no requirement that the money saved gets spent anywhere. The business could pocket the profit and do nothing with it.

This is actually a growing concern of late, as we have seen a number of top businesses start to hoard cash - the best example of which would be Apple, which is sitting on over $200 Billion.

Dead end make-work jobs are not "good for the economy", and the point of work is to create goods and services, not to "keep people busy".

It's certainly the ideal that everyone works to create more wealth overall. We can hope that automation starts to open up new markets like technological advances of the past did, but we should prepare for the possibility that it won't.

If the worst happens, and we end up with a growing group of poor, hungry individuals, then make work projects could be better than inviting future civil unrest. That's somewhat of a moot point, though, as there is plenty of neglected infrastructure that we as a country could start training and paying people to repair.

Comment Re:...what (Score 4, Informative) 104

Approving mergers generally falls under the purview of the FTC (see merger review).

The only reason the FCC came up is due to the fact that the two companies may have had to transfer FCC licenses as part of the deal. Since it appears no transferal is taking place, the FCC is not involved.

Slashdot Top Deals

Physician: One upon whom we set our hopes when ill and our dogs when well. -- Ambrose Bierce

Working...