please note, the technical problems are on the ISS and have noting to do with any Space X equipment.

Dedupes client side.

will be happy if it does it right ...

I have my own domains and do this with tunnelled rsync to a NAS4Free box, though for long term storage I like SpiderOak (and TarSnap). SpiderOak keeps historical versions and dedupes the data.

Try SpiderOak. Free 2 GB, zero-knowledge, secure. Works on a load of OSs and devices.

I'm a completely satisfied customer.

Theo de Raadt should fork OpenSSL. He could call it OpenOpenSSL.

.

I think he's saying a lazy, greedy, corporation is more dangerous than 1000 imaginary terrerists.

... it's kind of like a Chinese Snopes, except you go to jail rather than being unfriended.

It seems like some of the less deep thinkers these days get confused by our societal value of equality.
When the founding fathers said said "all men are created equal", they meant that the government should treat everybody the same out of general fairness.
They didn't mean that Dr J and Albert Einstein have the same attributes.

Anyhow, you most likely won't be successful retraining most coal miners to write code.
But it's not much of a stretch for most coders, particularly brogrammers like Marky Z, to learn to shovel shit.

who the hell still pays for cable? cavemen?!
All the smart kids just stream games of throne on their smartphones. HA! You thought you had me there, but see, I didn't say on their itermanets!

The ONLY thing cable has to offer is live events (S P O R T S), and face it, this is slashdot.

From the proof-of-concept page I mentioned above.

Conclusion

It is quite obvious in light of the recent revelations from Snowden that this weakness was introduced by purpose by the NSA. It is very elegant and leaks its complete internal state in only 32 bytes of output, which is very impressive knowing it takes 32 bytes of input as a seed.

Here is the Github repo for the PoC code.

This PRNG is not the NSA making a crypto system stronger ala DES, it's a backdoor.

[sorry, link screwed up in my reply, should have checked more closely.]

There is also a nice proof-of-concept backdoor with a link to the github repo.

RSA has denied having knowledge of the backdoor, says NSA tricked them, and has never denied the $10M payout. Some of Snowden's leaks mention it.
Reuters has a summary

proof-of-concept backdoor with a link to the github repo.

None of that is a smoking gun, but there is enough smoke to tell me there is a fire.

Boy, if there's one thing that could ever kill Open Source it would be being held legally liable for a commit with a bug in it.

It burns me that RSA is not held liable for their $10M NSA backdoor in Dual_EC_DRBG PRNG. Customers should be flocking in droves but RSA gives enough swag at conferences that the suits don't care.

Your privacy sold off for $10M and some mouse pads.