Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I still don't get it after all these years... (Score 4, Interesting) 84

One of the advantages is that it provides some isolation which is an extra layer for security that is particularly useful for internet facing apps like Thunderbird and Firefox.

its not the only way to do it, but it is the most user friendly way and integrated with GUI package managers.

Comment Re:We ought to be contracting the space (Score 1) 75

Transnational is not the biggest problem. .org, .com, .net and sometimes even .edu are used as generics, not as US domains. e.g. there are a not of British businesses that use .com domains.

The problem lies in the history of .us which was not taken up very much IIRC the problem was that the subdomains were based on states rather than purpose. Most other countries either allowed a set of subdomains by purpose (e.g. .co.uk and .ac.uk) or just allowed people to register domain just under the TLD.

Comment Re:Exit tax (Score 1) 210

I read an article in a British accountancy magazine about other "accidental americans", some of who got into quite a lot of trouble with US authorities. Some never realised they were US citizens until the IRS prosecutd them.

Boris Johnson was a dual national (born in the US to British parents) and renounced his US citizenship AFTER having to pay US tax on property he inherited in the UK.

Comment Re:Experts? (Score 1) 172

The problem is that if you have a complex model (i.e. lots of assumptions) you can tune it until it (over)fits the data. When you has lots of possible models the same problem applies.

This is why lots of people will show you stock picking models that back-test will that lose you money.

How complex is CIMP5? How many variants were tried before one that worked that well was found?

If its too tunable, testing it on just 40 years of data means accuracy is the result of over-fitting rather than good modelling.

Comment Re:Standards (Score 1) 467

Now throw GPLv3 in and you throw a monkey wrench in. You only see GPL software on techies machines because they know what the consequences are.

Most users are not even aware of GPL. To most people the only distinction is between software they pay for, and software they do not pay for (which includes Windows because it came on their PC).

Businesses might be slightly more sophisticated because they deal with things like site licenses, but all they will care abut the GPL is whether they have to pay for it.

Comment Re:Standards (Score 1) 467

I use KDE, because I like a number of KDE apps (file managers, especially) so it makes sense to use it. It is set up to look very like I had XFCE set up when I used it (two panels, one vertical on the side with icons of running apps, one small one over part of window title bar at the top with system tray and some applets).

My wife uses XFCE, and is quite happy with it, and does not care what she uses.

My older daughter uses XFCE because Gnome was heavy on her laptop.

My younger daughter uses KDE because she likes the desktop cube and other eye-candy.

I do not think any of us want to use the same "standard" desktop as the others.

Comment Re:Why? (Score 1) 82

What is the purpose of limiting domain name increases? They are all sold on the secondary market anyway, where these rules do not apply

Not true. I own multiple domains, and have owned many more over the years. None were bought on the secondary market.

Of the many I no longer own, I sold exactly one - a three letter .com just got too good a price to keep. No speculative domain at all - it was formed from the first, middle and last letters of my surname and used for years for a personal site.

None of my customers (I have done a lot of web site and web app development for SMEs over the years) has bought or sold a domain that I know of.

Slashdot Top Deals

Elliptic paraboloids for sale.

Working...