Comment Re:Is global warming also going to (Score 1) 96
whew, he used the wrong word, so I don't have to think about what he said.
That was a close one!
whew, he used the wrong word, so I don't have to think about what he said.
That was a close one!
How many years all together have the Republicans spent investigating Hillary now?
> "illicit streaming sites such as myflixer and projectfreetv..."
Got it, thanks!
The AI part *doesn't matter* because using AI doesn't automagically make something plagiarism.
This isn't a shame at all.
Plagiarism is plagiarism, regardless of whether there's AI involved, and this drives that point home. The tools you use don't have anything to do with it. You *can* plagiarize with AI, but just because it trained on something doesn't mean that everything the AI creates is plagiarizing that thing.
Thinking that everything AI does is plagiarism tracks extremely well with very fundamental misunderstandings about how it actually works.
...is call all of these people "pathetic" and "gross" and tell them to "get a girlfriend". That should increase their self-confidence and help them interact with real people.
Seriously.
My wife works in a lymphoma ward at a hospital, and they have nearly as many patients now as there were during peak covid, and nobody wants to talk about it.
Now that you're feeling all smug, I want to point out that I'm just kidding, and they have the same fucking number of patients as the always did.
I don't want to be sued for copyright infringement because I could summarize it.
wat
> Maybe if our government schools spend more time in health class on dietary requirements at different stages of life and food choices, and less time on nonsense like Tommy maybe Tammie and all the different places he could stick his female penis, we could get a handle on this.
Yes, I also blame trans people for bad food labeling.
...but if you give us a chance, we'd be willing to do it for a lot more money.
Don't play word games and make excuses for this crap.
Yes, everyone is biased, and that bias seeps into everything. That being said, there's a difference between making a good faith effort to counter your own bias, versus deliberately ignoring things so you can tell the story you feel like telling rather than present events as close as you can to what actually happened.
And I'm sure you'll say that it's just a matter of degree and where to you draw the line, but if someone's bias (even while making a good faith effort to avoid bias) is this egregious, they shouldn't be working in journalism.
...that would explain why Q is always wrong about everything.
see subject
Who wants to bet they use 3rd world labor?
Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only specification is that it should run noiselessly.