Better yet, enforce what's there now. DMCA takedowns are filed by specific individuals, under penalty of perjury.
I dislike when I see people misunderstanding the perjury part of the DMCA stuff. The DMCA mentions perjury twice in the law. the first is this line about filing a DMCA takedown notice: "A statement that the information in the
notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury,
that the complaining party is authorized to act on
behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly
infringed."
The statement that the information in the notification is accurate is *NOT* a part of the under penalty of perjury, just that you're authorized to act on behalf of the owner. Meaning you can sit and fire inaccurate notices constantly without penalty of perjury as long as you're authorized to send out notices by the content holder.
On the flip side the counter notice has the following under penalty of perjury: "A statement under penalty of perjury that the subscriber has a good faith belief that the material was
removed or disabled as a result of mistake or
misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled."
Yep, the person countering the notification has to say under penalty of perjury that the material itself was not the accusers material.
Seems unfair to me.
Car loan doesn't factor into it, not sure why you mention that over the total purchase price & operating cost over the life of the vehicle.
With a 60 mile round trip that is 15,600 miles per year just work and back, Add in other driving I'll hit 100k in 5 or so years easy.
If I drive low miles, I don't need a car with a bigger battery and longer range. None of what you responded with really matters to my points.
I'm not sure what your point was?
Is there indication that the demographic doing that is doing these things? I read the article and it didn't mention anyone's sneakers, phones or streaming services.
Is this just another myth like the "welfare queen" myth started in the 70's?
New homes being built will have chargers built for them. Older homes will have chargers installed as people purchase EVs. Apartment Rental places will slowly have people demand chargers and chargers will be installed to meet that demand. Chargers already are being installed at stores, rest stops, and other businesses. It's not a problem that needs to be solved immediately, so can be incremental. If where you live doesn't have an EV charger, you include that information in your overall calculation when you're choosing what car to get.
Evening out the demand between day and night is a good thing for the generation companies. If that means there isn't as much or any discount at all on electricity then it'll be a good problem to have, means the infrastructure isn't being left unused.
If you're taking a lot of 4 hour trips and the EV can't handle that, don't get an EV. But at some point, the gas savings from all those trips that are under 4 hours will be well worth the cost of renting a petrol car for the infrequent 4 hour trip.
If EVs are there yet for you, then that is fine, you're not yet the target market. Eventually we'll reach a saturation market with EVs which will allow the vast majority of people to be able to fit in their limitations. Until then, there are other options. You can stick with your gas car, you can buy a new gas car, you can buy a used gas car.
I for one am exactly in the demographic you describe. I rent at a place that has no EV chargers, I drive 60 miles round trip to work, so a really short range EV would work, but would make it difficult for my wife to do errands after work, so we would need to get a second car for her. We occasionally take 4 hour trips across NYS, and while there are plenty of chargers, it would be difficult to do so on one charge, and the place we go that is 4 hours away doesn't have a charger, so we would want to charge on the way anyways, so we had some charge left over at the destination.
But when I look at the TCO of an EV vs a conventional car I'm jealous. My next car will at least be a hybrid, but I'm hoping things progress fast enough that I can get an EV.
Graphics cards don't seem cheap to me. The RTX3080 came out almost exactly 2 years ago for $699 and now it's $799. This is not how things worked for computer parts in the good old days.
With Etherium going Proof of State, ebay has started to light up. 3080's are going for as low as $550 including shipping, and I think that the price hasn't hit the bottom there.
But I don't think it's just miners snapping up cards - scalpers are still snapping them up to resell.
Scalpers don't hold them long enough to be considered a part of the demand. They're certainly a part of why it's hard to get cards at MSRP, but once they have them they're the ones doing the selling at the 3x markup and want to get rid of them as fast as possible. Sitting on inventory is extremely bad for a scalper.
If we divert syringes away from Portland, San Francisco, LA, Vancouver... how will the disenfranchised get their daily heroin?! Priorities people! - the left
Just like they used to. They will reuse syringes spreading disease. Just like they used to.
"Show business is just like high school, except you get paid." - Martin Mull