Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Why did climate scientists emit 30,000 tonnes of C02 this weekend? (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader writes: This weekend, 25,000 Earth, Sun, and planetary scientists from across the US and abroad flew to New Orleans for the annual American Geophysical Union’s Fall Meeting. These scientists study the impact global warming is having on Earth. Unfortunately, their air travel to and from the meeting will contribute to that warming by emitting around 30,000 tonnes of CO2.

As an Earth scientist and AGU member myself, I know the importance of their work. Still, there’s something wrong with this picture. As scientists, our work informs us – with dreadful clarity and urgency – that burning fossil fuel is destroying the life support systems on our planet. There’s already more than enough science to know we need to stop. Yet most scientists burn more than the average American, simply because they fly more.

Few people know how harmful it is to fly in planes, including scientists. In 2010, I sat down and estimated my climate emissions. It turns out that, hour for hour, there’s no better way to warm the planet than to fly. I’d flown 50,000 miles during the year, mostly to scientific meetings. Those flights accounted for 3/4 of my annual emissions. Over the next two years, I gradually decreased my flying.

Peter Kalmus is an atmospheric scientist at NASA's JPL

Comment A court ruling I agree with. (Score 0) 90

I am in favour of piracy to an extent. After all, you shouldn't be forced to pay for something you hate just because it is well advertised. These people are actively encouraging people to never pay for content, which I am against. This hurts the creators abilities to get paid. If you like it, go pay for it. Support the content you like.

Comment In other words... (Score 1) 416

Those that have few morals and have a vested interest in something will try to misdirect people, and those with lower intelligence are more likely to fall for it...

Did I get that right? I am sure pretty much anyone could have deduced that.

Comment Re:barking up wrong tree (Score 2) 218

Section 15 of the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms states "Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability". Notice that last part, "mental or physical disability". If a company discriminates against someone with a mental disability in Canada, they had best be prepared for some legal action to be taken. Also, look up the difference between a psychopath and someone with Schizophrenia.

Comment Re:Big Mistake on the Companies Part (Score 2) 617

I am not talking about consumer rights, I am talking about the company using their own mistake to make profit. instead, they are spending more for legal action, in addition to lost business and shipping costs, than they could potentially make by advertising their error, and letting the consumer keep the PS Vitas as gifts to the customer from the company for their mistake. By doing this, brand recognition would increase in a positive way, and it creates the possibility for mass spending in hopes of another error. Even if they only gain a handful of customers by doing this, there is a net gain over time. By doing what they are doing now, there will likely be a large number of negative reviews put online, scaring potential customers away. Also, the right to keep them as gifts in this case depends on the country in which the consumer lives.

Comment Big Mistake on the Companies Part (Score 1) 617

Personally, unless it was a crippling blow to the company, I would have made a big fuss about how anyone that received them could keep them as gifts. It would not only reflect well on the company, but depending on how well they advertised it, and how well news agencies covered it, it could create a massive boost to sales while people order tons of items while hoping for another error to happen.

Comment Re:Obvious? (Score 1) 816

A paid poster I am not. If you have the time to read every post on top of the articles, I am surprised you have time to even have a job. For articles like this, I do a quick skim of the conversations, and if I feel like it, add my two cents. As for making under $20 an hour, I do not see how paying close attention to /. conversations will impress my boss enough to give me a raise.

Comment Obvious? (Score 1) 816

That this isn't common knowledge to most is surprising to me. World population is growing exponentially, we are consuming resources faster than they can be replaced, and people not fit to lead are leading many countries. I don't know if the year of this happening is right, but we will eventually crash and burn. This could be due to war, famine, mass civil disruption, running out of resources, over-population, or any number of other ways I have not thought of. Going green may put this on hold for a while, or it may not, but there must eventually be a culling of the human race.

Slashdot Top Deals

Don't panic.

Working...