Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment I assume it asks the standard questions (Score 1) 9

I assume it asks the standard questions and measures the response time, you know, stuff like:

"Youâ(TM)re in a desert walking along in the sand when all of the sudden you look down, and you see a tortoise, itâ(TM)s crawling toward you. You reach down, you flip the tortoise over on its back. The tortoise lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs trying to turn itself over, but it canâ(TM)t, not without your help. But youâ(TM)re not helping. Why is that?"

Comment Re:Graffiti is not art. (Score 1) 115

I understand what you are saying. I haven't thought about it too much, but I assume for many crimes, some kind of repair-ative justice is appropriate. The perpetrator damaged something, so they have to work to repair it or otherwise make the victim whole, and have to perform extra work as a punishment to encourage the perpetrator to not repeat the act.

The problem is that many punishments don't seem to lead to a reduction in recidivism. I don't know that humanity has _really_ studied how to _really_ change people's behavior to prevent repeated behavior. We _think_ that punishments make it less likely for people commit the same crimes again, but I don't think we have any hard evidence for what punishments are effective in preventing recidivism with what probability in so many year. I guess I am thinking real Ludovico technique kinds of stuff, but non-evidence based punishment is just wasting everyone's time, perpetrator and victim alike. In the United States, you might even be able to argue that punishment that does not actually correct behavior is "cruel" because it is just punishing someone for vengeance without any greater purpose.

Comment Re:Why not release it now? (Score 3, Interesting) 283

The Washington Post had short article on this recently. Here's the link, I am unsure if there's a paywall
https://www.washingtonpost.com...

It sounds like the "issue" is that enough people, especially in vulnerable groups, have received that vaccine that most of them are vaccinated now. So just through statistics and population numbers, there are more vaccinated people than not, so there are more vaccinated people still getting COVID than not. I am sure the Fox team has spun this in some stupid fashion, but the basic data is probably sound.

Of course, the questions are "why are vaccinated people still getting covid?" and "are they just getting head cold-like covid, or pneumonia-like covid that needs hospitalization?" I apologize that I can respond to those properly right now.

Slashdot Top Deals

Successful and fortunate crime is called virtue. - Seneca

Working...