"On Monday, I asked Clark County Registrar Joe Gloria about this scenario. If ballots signed by someone else “came through, we would still have the signature match to rely on for identity,” he said. Asked if he was confident the safeguard would identify those ballots, he said, “I’m confident that the process has been working throughout this process.”
"He was wrong. Eight of the nine ballots went through. In other words, signature verification had an 89 percent failure rate in catching mismatched signatures.
Yes. Misrepresenting someone's argument in order to attack it is called the "Straw-man" fallacy.
I also know that the
Consider the source. They have their agenda and they will achieve it. Facts be damned.
Does the FCC call it a "giveaway to wireless carriers?" If not, why are you injecting your bias into the headline instead of reporting the facts?
Linux is dead.
Long live Linux!
Activists from the feminist and LGBTQIA+ communities have been trying to force the Linux project to join the Contributor Covenant [...] an agreement to implement a special Code of Conduct (frequently CoC from now on) aimed at changing the predominantly white, straight, and male face of programming. CC’s Code of Conduct is controversial particularly because it allows anyone to be banned from contributing code for any reason, usually with no mechanism for oversight or accountability.
On September 16 the pro-CoC side got their wish—Linux had officially committed to implementing and obeying the CC Code of Conduct—and they immediately set about using it to remove top Linux coders. Sage Sharp, who describes theyself as a “diversity & inclusion consultant, hufflepuff, non-binary agender trans masculine” and has 7k followers, cites GeekFeminismWiki and targets Google’s Theo Ts’o with accusations of being a rape apologist.
Opposition to CC’s Code of Conduct has generated thousands of posts on 4chan’s technology board alone.
This has prompted a growing discussion of rescinding GPL license grants from code contributions, in protest.
Specifically, in apparent retaliation, members of the Linux kernel developer community (by way of the Linux Kernel Mailing List) are now considering en masse rescinding of their grants of GPL licenses for their code contributions, in protest. Developers who have been banned as a result of the CoC are being encouraged to do the same.
This recent development may have been stimulated in part by founder Linus Torvalds' recent announcement that he will be stepping away from Linux kernel development, at least for the near term. Apparently, Linus was under increasing pressure from the CoC activists for his infamous impatience with—and boorish verbal abuse towards—submitters of code that does not meet his exacting standards for inclusion in the kernel.
In response, perennial Linux critic and agitator Richard Stallman (RMS) has stated he intends to decline comment on this internal Linux community controversy.
"Don't try to outweird me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal." - Zaphod Beeblebrox in "Hithiker's Guide to the Galaxy"