I'll second this. I once read a book published by the author on a vanity press. Although the content itself was good (and the writing was not too bad), the formatting looked like it had been done by a 10-year-old. Much of the text was either bold or underlined or italicized (and note that those 'or's are NOT exclusive ors), to the point that it was almost unreadable. Had it been formatted by an adult, I might well have purchased several copies to give to friends. As it was, I did not manage to read the entire book - the formatting was just too awful. Editing is NOT the same thing as writing. A good editing job is worth money.

It's not just familiarity. We have web-apps at work that work on IE6 but not most other browsers (even later versions of IE don't completely work properly). The underlying problem is IE6 was nowhere near standards compliant and, unfortunately, a lot of web apps were written for IE6. In short, there is plenty of blame to go around:
- the web developers who used non-standard "features" of IE6
- MS for standard non-compliance and for adding proprietary features to IE6
- companies who accepted web-apps that used non-standard features in IE6.

What province might that be? And could you please cite the relevant laws/regulations?

Just did a google search. Estimates on the cost of solar power (searched in the last year) range from $0.10/KWh to $0.19/KWh. I'd imagine that Arizona would probably be on the low end. So, depending on the cost of electricity in your area, solar might be a rational alternative.

Today, the use of remote control is relatively sane and benign. Tomorrow, who knows? Given the tendency of nut-jobs to enter government service...

Yeah, when I was a kid, flying was an adventure and a lot of fun. Now it's a PITA. It's been several years since I seriously considered a vacation that involved flying. I'd rather drive. If I have to fly to do it, odds are I'm not going to do it. If my attitude spreads, the airlines are in trouble.

On the other hand, your ISP sends no money at all to any of the web sites that you visit. Expanding on your own analogy, your ISP owns the streets. The billboards that you want torn down belong to the owner of the amusement park at the end of the street and they enable the amusement park owner, which is not the ISP, to provide you with free access to the amusement park. If you tear down the billboards, you will find that the amusement park either institutes an entrance fee or goes out of business.

Keep in mind that the people on slashdot are not typical computer users. We want to be able do whatever we choose to do to our computers, and we have both the skills and the vision to choose to do some things that really stretch the abilities of our computers.
Mundane, ordinary people basically use their computers to read email, visit facebook, surf the web, and play the odd game. They don't understand much about their computers and they really don't care. For that group of people, the iPad is an excellent device as it does everything they need to do, most (if not all) of what they want to do, and it's darned simple.
The iPad is the device for the masses. It is not the device for the ultra computer geek. If you don't like it, don't buy it. Better still, design and build something better (that's called the free market).

Am I the only one who initially misread the article title as being the obituary for newspapers? Stuff like this only serves to reinforce the expectation that printed newspapers are an endangered species. I wonder when the bailout will happen?

My father was an MD in government service. He had to stay current, and all of his study was done on his own time on his own dime, so we are not alone.
That said, in the IT industry, if you are not continually working to expand your skillset/knowledgebase, you will very quickly find yourself unemployable. If your employer wants to provide guidance in what to study, that's not a bad thing - there are so many possible areas of study that some guidance is useful. Now, if their guidance would required you to spend a lot more of your own money than would other areas of interest to you, they probably ought to pony up some part of the cost of studying that area. You might consider discussing it with your manager ("my budget for study is X. The cost of your suggestion is X + C. Could you cover C?").
Any good manager is willing to consider a win-win situation. If you don't have a good manager (or a good employer), study what will make you marketable in the direction that you want to move, and then MOVE.

Not a bad idea. Also aim to have people not buy CDs or DVDs or watch TV on that day. May I suggest September 5? If you wonder why, it's Jack Valenti's birthday.

No, seriously, that sounds like the mosquitos we get here in Winnipeg. It's why we'll never be invaded - no one in their right mind would want to live here. 8^).

They have no proof... unless they find your slashdot post in which you admit to rolling through the red light without stopping.

Some posts are better done as an anonymous coward.

If the best you can do is add a secondary charge to those already aimed at a criminal, you haven't really accomplished much. You have not made it harder for the criminals to operate, although you have made life more difficult for law-abiding citizens (and, per prior posts, law-abiding foreigners).

I'm not certain that the secondary charge will be very effective: "Your honour, I asked my good friend, Juan, if I might borrow his cell phone for a couple of days. Being a good friend, Juan said 'yes'". Unless it is illegal to lend a phone to a friend, getting around this dodge might be hard.

8^) Most government bureaucracies I've encountered are redundant in far more than 3 different ways. 8^) Actually, I was trying to be polite (I know, I know, if I keep that up, I'll be banned from slashdot).

So, the stated goal is to prevent criminals from using cell phones. Since we are talking about criminals, what prevents them from registering under a stolen identity? Or what prevents them from stealing cell phones? Or what prevents them from paying $1000 to Juan (who earns $50/month) over there to register their cell phone in his name? I understand the desire, but it won't work (even if government corruption does not undermine the plan). It will become another pointless government bureaucracy.