Having owned an iPhone and having worked in an environment where I've used and configured Android devices, I can absolutely believe that an iPhone is a better device than Android phones.
From what I've seen, iOS is significantly easier to use than Android.
Or do a search for search on Google. The first result? Bing.
If anything, this is more evidence of the imminent death of optical media(at least as we know them).
When everyone had CD drives it was generally easy to use a disc from one location in another.
Then some people got DVD discs, and for a while there were a lot of people who didn't have a DVD drive. If you brought a DVD from one place to another there was no guarantee you'd be able to use it.
Then we got to a point when most people had DVD drives, and it was generally easy to take a DVD from one place to another again.
Then there were multiple popular DVD formats(DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD-R DL, DVD+R, DVD+RW, DVD+R DL), and it wasn't necessarily easy to take your data from your house to your friend's house.
Then there were HD-DVD and Blu-Ray.
Now there will be holographic discs.
A few years from now there will be another incompatible format that promises to hold exponentially more.
And it could happen again and again and again.
Incompatible formats, lack of portability, lack of rewritability, fragility, and overall inconvenience in terms of storage are what are putting an end to optical media.
High Definition Innovative Video Information Interface
HDIVII
If there's one thing this world needs it's more patents.
There's too much innovation and not enough litigation nowadays.
P.S.: The order of the words in this posts and the subject is innovative so I've just applied for a patent for it, so if you quote it or reply to it you can expect to hear from my lawyers.
I would assume that the reason Android has a bigger marketshare than iPhone OS...
That's a misconception.
Android phones have a bigger percentage of the marketshare of phones than the iPhone has.
The same way you destroy lead and other heavy metals.
Wrap it up. Call it new. Sell it to unsuspecting Americans.
Problem solved.
Is this related to Intel's problems with the new Sandy Bridge chipsets?
The telecoms should be allowed to implement caps only if they are required to advertise their speed as the maximum data rate that would be sustainable under the cap. You're not really getting 10Mbps if you can't get 10Mb for every second.
So for example, there are 2,592,000 seconds in a month(60 seconds * 60 minutes * 24 hours * 30 days).
If the cap is 150GB the company should not be legally allowed to advertise their connection as anything greater than 150GB/2,592,000.
150GB = 150,000MB = 150,000,000kB = 1,200,000Mb = 1,200,000,000kb
1,200,000,000kb/2,592,000 seconds = 462.962kbps
Blazing fast broadband.
To write good code is a worthy challenge, and a source of civilized delight. -- stolen and paraphrased from William Safire
