Red Hat Vows To Stand Up To Patent Intimidation 168
mrcgran writes "Eweek is reporting on Red Hat's assurances that can continue to deploy Linux without fear of legal retribution from Microsoft. This, despite the increasingly vocal threats emanating from Redmond. 'In a scathing response to Ballmer's remarks, Red Hat's IP team said the reality is that the community development approach of free and open-source code represents a healthy development paradigm, which, when viewed from the perspective of pending lawsuits related to intellectual property, is at least as safe as proprietary software. "We are also aware of no patent lawsuit against Linux. Ever. Anywhere," the team said in a blog posting.'"
Re:Moron? (Score:5, Informative)
What they promised (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Quote goes on to say (Score:3, Informative)
Is this an issue in Europe? (Score:4, Informative)
Does this effect Europe? And more specifically the UK?
As far as I am aware Europe (and the UK) does not "do" software patents so even if MS is telling the truth about the Linux infringements are they even valid in Europe/UK?
Re:Finally (Score:5, Informative)
Re:What has to be considered (Score:5, Informative)
I was at a Redhat seminar this morning and they were talking about this exact issue. They said they belong to a consortium of companies (including IBM) who have pooled software patents for defensive purposes (I can't remember the name of the group, I want to say it's the Public Patent Foundation (www.pubpat.org) but that doesn't appear to be it). Specifically, if Microsoft tries to go against one of the members, they can search through their collection of patents, find one that MS violates, and counter sue with the desired effect of both sides either dropping it or cross licensing. Redhat's patent policy also states this (from http://www.redhat.com/legal/patent_policy.html [redhat.com]):
Re:Actionable? (It is in the UK) (Score:3, Informative)
See section 70 of the 1977 patent act (http://www.ipo.gov.uk/patentsact1977.pdf) if you want to know the details.
Re:Is this an issue in Europe? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:No lawsuit against Linux? Or Open src sftw? (Score:3, Informative)
Note that this does not involve Linux either, only Apache/Tomcat.
A good question to ask this company is what would happen if you switched to IBM's Websphere which is just apache and java.
Re:Sarbanes Oxley (Score:1, Informative)
You must be thinking of the Open Invention Network (Score:5, Informative)
I'm no fan of Bush but (Score:3, Informative)
Besides the primary outcome of the case was that AOL, Sun, Real etc got their payday. It just turned out that the fate of the Netscape browser and the Java language on Windows really had little to do with the consumer.
The only significant issue was the agreements with OEMs and the remedy came to late to make much difference.
Re:Actionable? (Score:3, Informative)
Saying that Microsoft's claims are invalid and thus no one should worry is 100% wrong. A resolution to this problem needs to be forced quickly, the situation can't remain as it is now because it has already hurt Linux companies and the community itself.
Either MS needs to be sued or they need to reveal the patents in question, but they can't just be ignored.
Red Hat & Novell Just hit with Patent Suit (Score:2, Informative)
joining up the DOT.dots .. :) (Score:4, Informative)
In July 2007, Acacia Research Corporation announced that Jonathan Taub [groklaw.net] joined its Acacia Technologies group as Vice President. Mr. Taub joins Acacia from Microsoft
Acacia Research Corporation
--
Is there any disinterested law official anywhere on the planet that is concerned with what is going on here. A seller of inferior software facilitates the formation of a patent troll and extortion racket. It then uses threats from said same company to intimidate people into using its own product and scare them away from using competitors product.