Microsoft to Open Source FoxPro

rah1420 writes "Microsoft has announced that it will open-source the core portions of the Visual FoxPro DBMS software to its CodePlex community development site. At the same time, Microsoft has announced that it will no longer be making new versions of the FoxPro DBMS."

Re:Open source is not a verb

[aapold]

I'm glad we have someone to grammar our articles.

Re:Open source is not a verb

[L. VeGas]

Don't verb that adjective! It bad's the language.

Excuse me, I have to go full my belly.

Probably the MOSL

[wiredog]

Microsoft Open Source License: You can look, but you can't touch.

Crazy

[N8F8]

Between FoxPro and VB it just amazes me that any company can afford to repeatedly crap on it's customers and still survive.

Re:glad to see foxpro dead

[dheera]

This is probably a money-making plot on Microsoft's part. They will "open source" it, but then when you read the million pages of fine print, you find out that it isn't open-sourced under GPL, but instead, they'll probably rather put it under one of their own crafted licenses that says that if you modify and redistribute and portions of the code, you must include the string "I like porcupines" and a link to the Microsoft homepage.

And then when someone does redistribute it like other source code (without reading the M$ license), they'll sit quietly for about 3 or 4 years, while this person's redistributed code becomes ever more popular. Eventually, it will become incorporated in digital cameras worldwide, database software that drives the next Google, and your next-generation toaster.

Approximately 1 year after that happens, and $1 billion have been made off the redistributed code, Microsoft will sue for not following the license. They will cite the fact that "I like porcupines" is not in the code and that a link to the Microsoft homepage is not included. They will complain that the lack of a link to Microsoft will have decreased Vista sales by $3 billion (because, naturally, the price of their OS is probably 3 times that of the code in question). They will demand the profits, win the case, and said company will have the option of either paying the legal fees, or being bought out by Microsoft.

On another note, "open source" of itself does not always mean "free to redistribute", it just means you get to view the source.

Re:Open source is not a verb

[drix]

Actually, I think it richens the language.

What about Bob?

[RonMcMahon]

I guess there is still hope that they will FINALLY open up the code to Bob! I can hardly wait! I'm dizzy with excitement over how I can apply this awesome technology and UI breakthrough in my Vista apps!

* Crickets *

[oldwarrior]

chirp chirp chirp...