Auto Install of IE 7 Delayed In Japan 201
filenavigator writes "Microsoft has delayed the automatic install of IE 7 in Japan. There's an an interesting response in one of the MSDN blogs. IT pros are saying that they have done this because business users asked it to be delayed. It seems to me many business users here in North America wanted it to be delayed as well, but were forced to scramble and deploy IE 7 blocking software. This looks like more proof that the IE 7 automatic push was more for marketing reasons, than security. If it were a security issue, than why wait on the Japanese push?" Does anyone know the 'technical' reason that the autoinstall was delayed?
It's not a coincidence.. (Score:4, Insightful)
At my friend's company, there was a corporate wide memo stating that no one was to install IE7 except the "new media" departments, because they do all the website work and need to be able to test how IE7 slaughters their HTML and CSS. Even the new media departments were told to install "At your own risk".
I don't think it's too far fetched to believe that the Japanese market caught word of how IE7 is breaking all sorts of other software and asked Microsoft not to push it. I think the response in the IE blog is bullshit. The Japanese don't want IE7. Not if it's going to break everything.
Aero
Re:This didn't happen overnight! (Score:2, Insightful)
We got the message Thursday from two of our application providers;
"IE7 will not work, please wait for fix from us!"
Things like this use quite a bit of time to go thru the system.
Are You Kidding Me (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:It's not a coincidence.. (Score:5, Insightful)
A lot of the software that are breaking which are not related to web, however, do so because of their use of the MSHTML rendering engine... In a -lot- of cases, just changing the doctype tend to make things -relatively- OK. For the rest...well, IE7 has been in beta and RC for how long now? I know that IT stuff doesn't happen overnight, but Microsoft gave as much warning as they possibly could. If stuff broke (and I'm guilty of that, some web apps I wrote did break, and I didn't take time to test it in IE7), its the developer's own damn fault. They had like a year or something. Jesus...
Re:Are You Kidding Me (Score:3, Insightful)
Compare Apple's update cycle to Microsoft's, prior to their "we're done with Windows!" release of XP. You had Windows 95B, Windows 98, Windows 98SE, Windows ME, Windows 2000, and Windows XP all released (for pay) in a roughly four year period (early 1997 to October 2001). Since 2002, there have been 3 updates to OS X for pay. I don't know about you, but the jump from 10.2 to 10.4 seems much more worthwhile than the jump from Windows 98 to ME (ME's atrocious quality and reliability notwithstanding).
Apple provides free updates to their OS, too--several of them, much more rapidly than Microsoft offers service packs, but more slowly than MS security fixes. Will XP SP3 introduce new applications and important features useful for developers or users? I wouldn't count on it.