Krita 1.6 — State of the Art 212
brendan0powers writes to tell us Linux.com is reporting that while Krita 1.6 may have been released with the rest of the KOffice suite this week it is anything but a run-of-the-mill piece of productivity software. Krita is a 'fully-loaded raster graphics workhorse' definitely capable of standing up to most anything else available. Linux.com and Slashdot are both owned by OSTG.
Huh? (Score:3, Interesting)
Okay, so where does it fit in the Photoshop, PaintShopPro, GIMP arena? Is it simpler, easier? More powerful (it is a fully loaded workhorse, after all)?
Maybe this is just a "hey - all you guys with the old Krita - there's a new
So, is this really sliced bread, or just a little bump in the feature set of KOffice?
what about RAW photo formats? (Score:1, Interesting)
Impressive (Score:4, Interesting)
The Krita developers are doing a laudable effort to grow their application carefully and intentionally, just like the Scribus has done, adding high priority features and implementing them well (Krita's new layer-groups implementation worked very well for me without getting in the way).
If it continues this way, Krita is likely to grab significant mindshare from the GIMP.
How the heck do I load a jpg? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:How the heck do I load a jpg? (Score:4, Interesting)
And as a longtime KDE user and contributor, I strongly suggest you to avoid Fedora if you want a good experience with KDE.
-- Cyrille Berger
Re:Why is being KDE important? (Score:5, Interesting)
Perhaps, perhaps not. In any case, Krita is surpassing the Gimp in some areas that people have been complaining about for years in Gimp, and nothing was done. As a developer, what would you rather do, argue on the Gimp mailing list until your face turns blue about wanting to change the interface, or just start your own project? Sometimes you have to make a clean break to get new ideas implemented.
Swedish coincidence? (Score:3, Interesting)