IE7 From a Firefox User's Perspective 250
Buertio writes, "A week with IE takes a look at IE7 from the perspective of a long-time Firefox user. The verdict? Microsoft has come a long way but still has some way to go before taking on Firefox and Opera."
Opportunity (Score:5, Interesting)
Firefox will go through the same thing next year, since Firefox 3 won't run on Windows 98 or Me, but it'll still run on Windows 2000. Of course, that's another 8-10 months for some users to upgrade (those percentages are about a third of what they were a year ago) -- and if you've gotten them hooked on Firefox while they're on Win98, they'll probably stick with it when they move to a new machine with XP/Vista. And in a year or two, as IE7 supplants IE6 and websites start targeting it, those holdout Windows 98 users might decide they're better off with a slightly-outdated Firefox 2 than a massively-outdated IE6.
Tarnished Brand (Score:5, Interesting)
All Microsoft can hope to do at this point is prevent more users from switching away, but that'll only work so long as IE7 doesn't become an exploitfest like its mildly-retarded predecessor. The next year or so will determine that as more IE6 users and malware authors migrate to IE7.
IE 7 RSS reader? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Opportunity? For what else? (Score:3, Interesting)
Back when Netscape was around en bloc and layers were the norm for many users, it was hell to code for both Netscape and Explorer, and often websites were split into two sections. So if Microsoft is trying to create a new and "better" standard, I don't fear Microsoft; I fear the complaining masses. The burden of being the (relatively) knowledgeable minority!
Re:Well.... (Score:2, Interesting)
IE7 Text Rendering (Score:4, Interesting)
LiveBookmark Folders (Score:5, Interesting)
I enjoy FireFox's live bookmarks because it gives me a quick and screen friendly way of scanning stories on sites like BBC,
Microsoft's Answer: display as a normal website with prettier formatting - and advertisements.
One saving grace for IE 7's implemenation of RSS feeds - it syncs them with Outlook 2007, where I can scan them easily as if they were email messages.
My verdict? Firefox still wins this match.
FF 2 lacks a real page zoom (Score:4, Interesting)
FireFox 2 lacks page zooming, which from a my perspective is impossible to live without on certain displays.
I'm a web developer (sometimes), and I love FireFox. As a developer I love FireFox because the Gecko team show consistent progress towards standards. From this perspective, FireFox is what the web should be. The worst thing about developing for FireFox is... writing broken code with comment hacks to support IE's nonstandard ways. But that's not FireFox's fault.
For DEMO or home theater purposes, FireFox is (on a high-res display) very very unusable.
Why?
FireFox 2 has no page Zoom. FireFox offers unchanged as a featurem plain old "Text zoom", which is not the same.
The fact that many pages don't scale to different resolutions well is not FireFox's fault.
But until all websites adopt a consistent method of page scaling, the workaround is going to be Page Zoom.
On a 42" LCD (1920x1080p), a fullscreen FireFox browser is legible from about 3 feet away (with my eyes).
If you make the text bigger, the page layout goes toast in FF. SURE, you can go in and change your video resolution to a non-native size and cause everything to get bigger, but that is not fun and it messes with other apps. The solution for now is some kind of liner scaling on the page.
On a 42" LCD (1920x1080p), a fullscreen Opera browser is legible from about 6 feet away (with my eyes), if you use Page Zoom of 180-200%. 200% really isn't needed, but there's some annoying artifacing In Opera if you resize at a factor of 1.8. 2x looks very nice!
I see IE has page zoom now, and I've done a little bit of testing. It seems no better than opera's at first glance. But it's THERE.
I'll continue rooting for FireFox privately, but it's hard to sell people on FireFox's importance... when you have to use Opera or MSIE on the big panel display.
Here's to FF 2.5 including this feature. One hopes!
Re:Opportunity (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:IE7 Text Rendering (Score:3, Interesting)
GUI is bad (Score:3, Interesting)
They had a clean slate to work with, and could have produced something truly intuitive, and highly usable, but instead they produce something which is only half a step away from dogshit. Honestly, separating the functional buttons is just stupid. To me, it appears that absolutely no research was done for the GUI, and they only spent money on the back end, and the graphics.
Removing the file menu is retarded.
So, to me, it doesn't matter how good IE7 is behind the curtains, the curtains themselves suck so bad that I simply will not use it.
The sad thing is that I'm not the least surprised by this: a unique opportunity completely missed, and Internet usability has been set back by at least a couple of years.
Re:FF 2 lacks a real page zoom (Score:1, Interesting)
I've never seen Page Zoom in action so I don't know if this is a poor imitation or reasonably similar...
"long-time Firefox user" (Score:3, Interesting)
The majority of the older mozilla userbase is on linux, think back to when mozilla was the default browser in debian, red hat, suse. only with firefox 1.0 did the development shift from this technical userbase to the hysterical evangelicals of firefox vs IE.
Re:ie better than firefox and opera in xml/ xsl (Score:5, Interesting)
I can't understand this. IE doesn't even preserve the encoding type on an XSL transform. I can't use it *at all* for my Japanese documents.
And it has unbelievably poor support for CSS. It won't even do tables. Not even in IE 7...
Your comment kind of blows me away...
slow (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Tarnished Brand (Score:2, Interesting)
No... Simply No....
You are so wrong, you don't even see it. Internet Explorer is a tarnished brand for the people that read slashdot, for the people that care about interoperability, for those that care about standards. Outside of that world, there is a world where Microsoft is a good brand name, equivalent to Jaguar in cars! Microsoft is the brand that bring you computing, that *is* computing.
I know that what the above paragraph says is not true, but it is for millions and millions of people.... In the end Truth is not important, Image is... And apart from us rebellious geeks, Microsoft has the image it needs.
The worst part is, I've seen good IT people sticking to Microsoft... Convinced, that it is always the best choice (like IBM, in the time... yes, I was there back then...Fuck, I'm old)
Why I like IE7 (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Opportunity (Score:1, Interesting)
I swore to fuck the post I'm replying to was written by the Penny Arcade "From my parents basement, i strike at thee, Gates!" guy.
Meanwhile, your line of thinking is dooming an entire generation of tech support workers to continue putting up with the bullshit that is a 98 box trying to get networking running. We don't tell people to upgrade because we're trying to make Bill Fucking Gates richer (hint: 98 tech support calls make US rich. 8% of the customer base, 40% of inbounds), we're telling them to upgrade because their computers are slow as dogshit and they're having a miserable time trying to get on this intraweb with the packard bell that their son so thoughtfully gave them seven years ago. They have no idea of Moore's law, no idea how much easier it is today.
I'm not sayin' that he should have told her to get a new computer...but I understand.
[1]If you're pretenious enough to think that your Slashdot post needs footnotes, you should at least fake it and make it more than one line long.
Re:ie better than firefox and opera in xml/ xsl (Score:0, Interesting)
Pot kettle black --- anyone who calls a big missing feature a bug is a dummy. There are books made for your type.
XSL is huge! Add to this, there are other missing fuatures (bugs as you call them) like SMIL, that IE has had since 2000.
All of this said, IE is missing tons of features that FF has --- embedded images, javascript 1.7, etc. etc.
Hoping they get their act together for IE8, because IE7 sure takes a lot less memory than FF2.
Re:Opportunity (Score:4, Interesting)