Firefox 2.0 To Debut Tuesday 445
An anonymous reader writes "Firefox 2.0 for Tuesday, says the Seattle PI. They give a quick recap of some of the new features, and discuss the ongoing IE vs. Fox debate." From the article: "Version 2.0 also improves on the tabbed-windows interface that Mozilla innovated and that Microsoft introduced for the first time last week with IE7, its biggest upgrade since 2001. Analysts said IE7 is a significant improvement over its predecessor, but the big question is whether it will stem Firefox's growth at Microsoft's expense. Firefox's share of the browser market has grown to 9.8 percent of the U.S. market this month, from 2.9 percent in October 2004."
Re:innovation? (Score:3, Interesting)
Minimum tab size (Score:5, Interesting)
Two of my prayers for FireFox Improvement (Score:5, Interesting)
1. Starts without maximizing itself to the full PC screen area. Always leaves space available. In contrast SeaMonkey correctly occupies the full PC screen area when starting (but SeaMonkey makes me create a new profile except for once.). FF thinks its full screen according to its maximize/window button but is mistaken.
2. FF fails CSS rendering because it uses an antique CSS engine.
http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid2/ [webstandards.org]
Those are my FF issues. What are yours?
Thanks,
Jim Burke
Re:innovation? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Hey Folks (Score:1, Interesting)
Sorry to feed the troll, but... the fact is that there are far too many IE-only web applications in the business world. It is very hard to crank down the security rules (let alone move to Firefox) due to these poorly implemented web applications (or web interfaces to legacy systems)
In fact, in the browser wars of the 1990s, Microsoft required that certain license terms included the requirement that some critical part of the license holder's web site have IE-specific behavior and/or require IE to operate correctly. (I know, we refused to sign that contract and ended up having to do our own implementation of the wininet.dll - which turned out to be a good thing in the long run but cost us dearly)
(Posting anonymously, for obvious reasons...)
Re:YAY! (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm a web developer (Score:4, Interesting)
should we care to support Firefox 1.5 now?
We know we'll have to support IE6 for years to come, even IE5. But Firefox users typically upgrade their browser quickly.
So: do I check my sites in FF 1.5? Do I even keep it?
Before you tell me "but they all render perfectly and the same": it's not true. I keep Firefox 1.07 for this reason here, since it handles quite a bit of elements/CSS in a different manner (even clearing floats differs a little in some cases).
There's also lots of bugs fixed in 1.5, but not in 1.07. And there's also new oddball behaviours in 1.5 not present in 1.07...
FF has 10% market share. I'm just split if it's worth it going into so much detail.. maybe I'll just support 1.5 for a few months and move to 2.0.
Please share your opinion.
Konqueror is rock solid and light on resources. (Score:5, Interesting)
For example, when I simultaneously open about 15 of the blogs and websites I read daily, top reports Firefox 2.0 rc3 as using 149 MB of virtual memory. Konqueror, on the other hand, uses a cool 28 MB for those exact same sites. Opera uses 31 MB. So as far as I can tell, Firefox is the lame duck when it comes to effective memory usage. This is with a build right from mozilla.org, without any additional extensions installed. I also disabled the cache for all three browsers, since I've heard that Firefox has a policy that leads to excessive memory usage.
A problem I have had with the Firefox 2.0 release candidates is crashes. This doesn't happen with Konqueror, or any other application I'm using, so I doubt it's faulty RAM. These crashes aren't easily reproducible, and I frankly don't have the time to bother debugging an application that I really don't use, and that crashes the few times I do try it out.
full screen (Score:3, Interesting)
Firefox has always left the toolbars around to eat up valuble screen real estate. The application goes full screen, but not the web page.
If firefox wanted to 1-up IE, they could make the toolbars autohide, and then even make the scrollbar autohide. Then it would be true full screen. How's that for marketing speak?
But in all honesty, this is a feature I would enjoy.
Re:Two of my prayers for FireFox Improvement (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Here's hoping. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:MDI (Score:1, Interesting)
Mozilla also stole pop-up blocking and mouse gestures from Opera.
No it did not. Those existed in other browsers before Opera... primarily in IE HTML control derived Windows browsers. But hey... as usual, the Opera super-fans are out in force to make sure it steals as much credit as possible.
IE7 is horrible (Score:2, Interesting)
What the hell was MS thinking? IE7 doesn't touch Opera or FF.
The elephant in the room... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:innovation? (Score:1, Interesting)
Firefox only autocompletes on pages in history, which is not good enough. I love the ability to type a few letters of any of my bookmarked sites, and having it autocomplete for me.
Re:YAY! (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:YAY! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Konqueror is rock solid and light on resources. (Score:3, Interesting)
'course, it helps that Konqueror can leverage a ton of the infrastructure already present in KDE, and as such, it's actual resident set size can be much lower (since many more of the libraries it utilizes will be shared with other apps).
The question is, how much total RAM is that monster KDE desktop taking up?
Of course, if you're using KDE already, then you're absolutely right, konq will be a better choice if your goal is to reduce memory footprint. However, for folks such as myself (I use WindowMaker), there's probably little advantage to using one over the other.
I also disabled the cache for all three browsers, since I've heard that Firefox has a policy that leads to excessive memory usage.
Actually, that's incorrect. What you want to do is disable the fast back/forward cache. It is controlled by a property called "browser.sessionhistory.max_total_viewers". Set that value to 0 to disable the feature. This can significantly decrease the amount of memory used by FF at the expense of slower back/forward response.
Re:YAY! (Score:3, Interesting)
It's not like people were getting a hard time with IE6, despite it's handicapped CSS handling, for instance.