Linux Powers Lilliputian PCs 193
An anonymous reader writes "Gumstix is launching a whole line of dinky little PCs little larger than a Big Red Plenty Pack. The first Netstix model targets server, sniffing, and network simulation. The next model will be USB-powered, followed by models with SD/MMC slots and built-in WiFi. They come with Linux 2.6.17, and lots of room for user applications."
want one^h^h^h 1000 (Score:5, Interesting)
Nice: 200MHz XScale, 64 MB RAM, 16 MB Flash (3MB occupied by OS), 100MBit Ethernet, CF-II slot, 1-3/8 * 4-1/8 inches (35 x 103mm). Even nicer: the next version with integrated WiFi. All done by a company of 26, with no intention to grow, but to automate more if more work has to be done, so prices will fall.
Not so nice: $186.5 for one, $165 in volumes of 1000. I know, this is still very cheap for something in "industrial size", but too much to build one into my door bell, one into each phone, one into each light switch (the joy of being unable to turn of the light due to an 500 error), one into the fish tank, one into the fridge to finally order milk like we have been promised for years.
But give it some years, and I will have a log of how many minutes I brushed my teeth based on the report my eToothBrush send wirelessy to my server.
Re:image a cluster of these (usb hub powered) (Score:3, Interesting)
The article mentiones one of the first applications, using 24 of these to simulate a network at a network equipment vendor on his desktop. From there to your cluster is just a tiny step. SETI@desktop.
What are you talking about? (Score:2, Interesting)
Also keep in mind that a 200 MHz ARM CPU is somewhat more powerful than a 200 MHz Pentium CPU. So in effect, these systems may turn out to be quite a bit better than the desktops we had in the late 1990s.
hmm... (Score:2, Interesting)
Then again, you could just buy a used desktop from the local computer shop like I did, which is much cheaper, faster, and powerful, but has the disadvantage of size.
Re:want one^h^h^h 1000 (Score:5, Interesting)
Of course this reminds me of the story about a guy giving a speech at a chipmaker convention reminiscing how 25 years earlier a guy had given a speech at the same hotel saying the microchip industry will never be that big because you don't need a chip in every doorknob.
And here, 25 years later, every doorknob in the hotel had a chip.
Go figure.
Same specs as a WRT54GS (Score:1, Interesting)
How much $$$ ?!?!!! (Score:5, Interesting)
i dont get it (Score:4, Interesting)
Pocket PC (Score:2, Interesting)
Dan East
Framebuffer module (Score:5, Interesting)
I want to use these as a very simple display for home automation - hang one on the back of the TV, use a PIN switch video port (or the video input on the TV), run about a 40 by 24 character display - not fancy, but enough for display.
A frame buffer like that could easily be implemented in a small FPGA now-a-days.
Of course, a tiny X server or VNC client would be even better.
Blackdog (Score:1, Interesting)
This is similiar. I bought one but haven't had much time to play with it.
The early Days of Bubblepack computing (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Framebuffer module (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:These aren't PCs... (Score:1, Interesting)
The whole thing runs debian from a cheap 1GB CF card I picked up from Fry's. / is mounted read-only with a few tmpfs mounts for the logs,
Re:i dont get it (Score:2, Interesting)