Short Film About CERN's Large Hadron Collider 179
Lobster911 writes "Seedmagazine.com has posted a new film, Lords of the Ring, about CERN's Large Hadron Collider. NESTA fellow Alom Shaha takes us through the world's largest machine, as he lets the scientists who work at CERN explain the LHC and what they hope to accomplish with it. The highly-anticipated collider is set to start up in 2007, running at full speed by 2008."
Re:Basic research is often hard to justify (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Unimportant (Score:5, Informative)
It was one of the other physicists (not the ones with whom Teller collaborated on the above report) who kept talking about it afterward, and allowed the story to live on, much to the annoyance of a number of Manhattan Project researchers.
Re:I wrote a little poem... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Low content (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I wrote a little poem... (Score:3, Informative)
(I actually did look it up while composing, I just wasn't thinking.)
LHC@Home (Score:4, Informative)
Re:OK, jokes are fine, but . . . (Score:5, Informative)
this machine will only reproduce these collisions in very controlled conditions, letting us learn from them.
btw, this is not a concern i've ever heard an actual physicist raise. all theories of micro black holes predict they burn themselves out as fast as they are created, as there is a critical mass needed for self-sustainment. i have doubts regarding the reliability of your "science" blog.
Re:a little hasty (Score:1, Informative)
The thing that should be kept fairly reliable is the recording of data. With that stage, it is important to do the work quickly and reliably. And of course if the software does crash, it is important to pick up and keep going after that.
What you are working with is probably what's called the "offline" software. It's not as important to get it working so soon. And if it crashes on reconstucting some events, it's no biggie. Just ignore those events. Presumably it will crash during simulated events with the same frequency that it crashes during real events (if the simulation is any good), and so there will not be much systematic bias introduced.
Also take note that I am an undergrad writing software to align the muon spectrometer, they must be behind...
No. The reason to involve undergrads is so that they will learn, and some of them will go on to become graduate students, then postdocs, then research scientists or professors. It's a kind of apprenticeship. If you had only have the experts doing all the work, then all the expertise would be lost within a generation or two.