Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

FTC Says More Regulation Needed For Games 149

simoniker writes "The FTC has testified in detail to Congress that, though the game industry has 'made progress' in regulating the marketing of violent video games, 'more needs to be done.' It also revealed that it's conducted undercover surveys into whether underage gamers can buy M-rated games. It also commented: that '...the Commission will continue to monitor closely developments in the area and will initiate actions, such as the case challenging the marketing of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, when appropriate.' Will we see the FTC stepping in more often in controversial cases regarding violent video games?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

FTC Says More Regulation Needed For Games

Comments Filter:
  • Finally (Score:5, Funny)

    by MrSquirrel ( 976630 ) on Thursday June 15, 2006 @01:32PM (#15541447)
    I mean, it's about time they did something about these horrible video games! I mean, they've already fixed all the other problems in the world like... the war in Iraq, FEMA handling the New Orleans relief, stopping Iran from producing nukes, world-hunger, huge corporate scandals, huge governmental scandals (that Rove guy was totally innocent, he was framed by the evil liberal media... even though the huge conservative corporations own almost all the media outlets). THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Thursday June 15, 2006 @01:35PM (#15541496)
    shock and awe, my friend, shock and awe.
  • by trix7117 ( 835907 ) on Thursday June 15, 2006 @01:36PM (#15541509)
    That post must have taken a while to write. Little Timmy had a birthday halfway through.
  • Prosser. (Score:5, Funny)

    by Tackhead ( 54550 ) on Thursday June 15, 2006 @01:37PM (#15541516)
    Government: "Come off it, Mr Slashdotter," he said, "you can't win you know. You can't keep the Constitution in front of that bulldozer indefinitely."

    Slashdotter: > What exactly was wrong with the ESRB ratings we had already? They gave an age category and described any potentially offensive content. It was perfect. What more could we need?

    Government: What do you mean "what more could we need"? These are regulations! You've got to legislate regulations!

    Some factual information for you. Have you any idea how much damage that bulldozer would suffer if I just let it roll straight over that Constitution of yours?"

    Slashdotter: "How much?"

    Government: "None at all."

  • by faloi ( 738831 ) on Thursday June 15, 2006 @01:48PM (#15541641)
    The FTC essentially says that game manufacturers need to actually tell the ESRB about the content in their games, and that retailers shouldn't sell "M" rated games to underage kids. Aside from this being Slashdot, is there anything truly unreasonable in those requests?

    Yeah, I know I'm also choosing to believe that the FTC wouldn't step in with some wide ranging rules allowing the ATF to become the ATGF. Although visions of moderately trained ATGF agents conducting a SWAT style raid on a LAN party do make me smirk. "Damn, those are good speakers! That really sounded like a flash-bang!"
  • by Mr.Surly ( 253217 ) on Thursday June 15, 2006 @02:05PM (#15541861)
    You know, when I was six, I loved watching Wile E. Coyote. Despite my age, I never had an urge to strap large springs on my feet and jump off a cliff. I knew it was ridiculous.

New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman

Working...