Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

No Space for MySpace? 272

conq writes "BusinessWeek looks at the flaws in the bill proposed by the House of Representatives that would block access to social networks and Internet chat rooms in most federally funded schools and libraries. One big problem with their bill is it is much too vague, it 'could rule out content from any number of Internet companies, including Yahoo! and Google.' What's more, DOPA would prohibit sites that enable users to create their own content and share it. That covers a wide swath of the online world, known colloquially as Web 2.0, where users actively create everything from blogs to videos to news-page collections." This is analysis of a bill we covered yesterday.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

No Space for MySpace?

Comments Filter:
  • by panda ( 10044 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @05:03PM (#15321279) Homepage Journal
    I don't see how they're justifying general public libraries, though.

    It's aimed soley at institutions that receive money from the "Universal Service Discount" program, y'know that "fee" or "tax" that is added onto your phone bill every month. This money is paid out to qualifying schools and libraries that apply for the program.

    COPA, the law that "requires" filtering of harmful content at libraries and schools, applies to the same group of institutions.

    Essentially, if you're an administrator and you decided that your institution does not wish to or cannot comply with the blocking rules, the answer is simple: Don't apply for USD money.

  • by JeanBaptiste ( 537955 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @05:04PM (#15321291)
    0.0.0.0 myspace.com
    0.0.0.0 www.myspace.com

    if you're on windows, its c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
    if you're on linux, you should already know how to do this

    problem solved.

    "No dear, I don't know why MySpace doesn't work anymore."
  • by Golias ( 176380 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @05:20PM (#15321439)
    What's incredibly short-sighted about this bill is that the Internet is not, and never was, intended to be a tool for one-way information gathering. Plenty of such tools already exist. The value of the Internet is a direct result of the fact that it is a means of two-way communication.

    MySpace gets used for a lot of frivolous blogs and teen flirting, but it's silly the way it's being scapegoated. Just as with AOL chat a few years ago, the bogeyman of a Creepy Old Guy wanting to run off with your teenager keeps getting trotted out, but the vast majority of statuatory rape cases are going on in homes, with family members or close friends of the family.

    Where's the crack-down on a dad's 40-year old drinking buddy slipping upstairs to visit his daughter during a back-yard BBQ? That's the *real* teen abuse problem.

    For the most part, there are no "strangers in the bushes" to worry about, and the way to guard against such rare cases is to teach your teen some sense.

    Look, princess: The grown-up who wants to hook up with you at a motel is not "cool". If he was "cool" he could find women his own age to sleep with. He's a LOSER, and you should stay away from him. Now, have fun chatting with your pals on MySpace, but remember that I have a profile on your Friends list, and will check in from time to time. There will be consequences for misbehavior.

    This bill would do absolutely nothing to protect children. Irresponsible kids and their adult predators will simply move to a different medium to hook up, such as text messaging on cell phone networks. I'd like to think that those behind this bill are simply ignorant of that fact. If you live in Michael Fitzpatrick's Congressional district, please write to him and explain that fact.
  • Federal funding (Score:3, Informative)

    by MobyDisk ( 75490 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @05:37PM (#15321543) Homepage
    We need a constitutional ammendment to fix this. The founding fathers forbade the federal government from regulating free speech. But the government found a loophole:

    1) Offer federal funding to sources of media (schools, libraries).
    2) Get them hooked on it.
    3) Threaten to cut it off if they don't comply with a freedom of speech limitation.

    Really, they could pass any law at all using this technique. Ex: "The president is now above all laws. Any state that does not agree to enforce this loses all state funding."

    The federal legislature would never pass a limitation on their own power, but it is possible for the states to propose and pass an amendment without federal support according to Article V [usconstitution.net] of the US constitution. (Note 2 explains this [usconstitution.net])

    I suppose that is silly though - the states could just start refusing federal funding. But that isn't likely unless all of them do because no state wants to be at a disadvantage.

The nation that controls magnetism controls the universe. -- Chester Gould/Dick Tracy

Working...