FreeBSD 6.1 Released 227
nbritton writes "FreeBSD 6.1 has been released! This release is the next step in the development of the 6.X branch, delivering several performance improvements, many bugfixes, and a few new features. Of note are the major improvements to the filesystem and SATA code, possibly making FreeBSD the number one choice for SATA RAID implementations. For a complete list of new features and known problems, please see the release notes, errata list, Bittorrent Downloads, Mirrors, Hardware Notes, and Installation Guide."
Re:But... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Errata list? (Score:4, Informative)
6x is a good branch (so far so good anyway) and MUCH better than 5. Performance is okay, not as good as Linux in some scenarios but not bad either. On my Sokris 4801 (233Mhz pentium class) it seems rather slow, but Freebsd 4x on my 133Mhz Pentium seems to be about the same - so I'd say not a big difference. If you need the most out of older hardware that is already running 4x I'd probably stick with it.
Hopefully I'll be able to figure this new bridging scheme out and be able to better evaluate performance.
Debian FreeBSD port (Score:5, Informative)
FreeBSD 6 + pf (Score:5, Informative)
## for SSHD from other hosts
pass in log on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if:network \
port 22 flags S/SA keep state \
(max 5, source-track rule, max-src-nodes 5, \
max-src-states 10, tcp.established 60, tcp.closing 5, \
max-src-conn-rate 3/30, overload flush global) \
label "SSHD_IN_$if"
If some sshd scanner hits my host more than three times in 30 seconds his packets go to an overload table and his states flushed. Any address or net listed in the badhosts table is blocked outright. It works as advertised and I couldn't be happier.
pf+altq really does give me a warm and fuzzy feeling inside.
Re:BSD and clusters (Score:5, Informative)
Check out LAM/MPI [lam-mpi.org] or see pages by people who've done it [und.edu]
Re:FreeBSD 6 + pf (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Number one choice for SATA RAID? (Score:3, Informative)
possibly making FreeBSD the number one choice for SATA RAID implementations
That's "possibly". As in, it hasn't been proven yet but the developers feel that it's ahead of the rest of the market. Therefore it may "possibly" be the number one choice.
Re:Any reason to switch? (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Any reason to switch? (Score:3, Informative)
But if my experience with Gentoo and Portage is any guide, then you've probably also been bitten by Portage -- Masked ebuilds, ~arch, whatever: the build you want is masked, and unmasking and building creates an amazing cascade of broken packages, right?
Maybe I'm not being fair; I tried Gentoo for the last time maybe two years ago. I *loved* the flexibility and built-from-scratchness. But at some point I got hooked into FreeBSD's ports, and AFAICT, there's no comparison, at least in terms of stability/QA. FreeBSD ports just work.
Anyway, just my $0.02.
Something similar with iptables (Score:5, Informative)
## $RED_DEV is Internet-connected interface, CUSTOMFORWARD is the chain being processed
iptables -A CUSTOMFORWARD -i $RED_DEV -p tcp --destination-port 22 \
-m state --state NEW -m recent --set
iptables -A CUSTOMFORWARD -i $RED_DEV -p tcp --destination-port 22 \
-m state --state NEW -m recent --update --seconds 60 --hitcount 4 -j DROP
Re:Any reason to switch? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Journaling Filesystem (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/procee
http://www.mckusick.com/softdep/ [mckusick.com]
Working Great! (Score:2, Informative)
If you haven't tried it, get an old box and give it a shot. More experience with Unix never hurt anyone!
Re:Any reason to switch? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Any reason to switch? (Score:1, Informative)
I tried in vain to setup FreeBSD 6.0 as a SATA software raid machine. I was using a more recent motherboard with graphics, network and SATA integrated on-board. I think they are all VIA chipsets. I eventually hit the eject on FreeBSD as I couldn't even get X up and running.
I bought a new motherboard without thinking too much about what I was buying and tried to install an operating system about which I knew just as little. Instead of taking the opportunity to make up for my obvious deficiencies, I quit when I realised my approach wouldn't work, but made a mental note to tell everyone about it when I had the chance.
I then tried Debian. All-in-all it was another less than positive experience. Both the 2.4 and 2.6 kernel versions of Sarge had problems with my hardware.
I popped in another CD and see what would happen, hoping that doing the same thing again would yield different results. It didn't.
I decided to explore Gentoo.
Despite, the fact that some people consider doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is a mark of insanity, I popped in yet another CD
Its working great with SATA and EVMS.
I was surprised that it worked.
It did require some source level tweaks
Well, it didn't really work, but someone told what I should be doing.
but part of the coolness I found with Gentoo is the very active user/support community and the tons of HowTos and guides.
Instead of visiting the FreeBSD website, where I could have found that FreeBSD offers a bewildering collection of well-written documentation in almost every imaginable format, I decided that The Handbook [freebsd.org],
the Books and Articles Online section [freebsd.org], Publications [freebsd.org], Web Resources [freebsd.org], A Section For Newbies [freebsd.org] or The Documentation Project [freebsd.org], or reading the documentation in
Unless they've made a quantum leap in improvements, FreeBSD would NOT be my choice for a SATA raid server.
I firmly believe my anecdotal experience qualifies me to offer non-sequitors with hyperbole but without embarassment.
Re:Journaling Filesystem (Score:5, Informative)
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-curren
Scott Long also touches on the subject in a interview he did for the bsdtalk podcast show:
http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/2006/02/bsdtalk017-in
Rebuilding world (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Any reason to switch? (Score:3, Informative)
Differing experiences, eh? But I guess mine was hardware raid, afterall, and that is a difference for sure. Though, I have software raid setup on my FreeBSD file server, which was extremely easy after reading this page [freebsd.org]. I guess if you don't know where to look, things are difficult? Good thing all the FreeBSD documentation is centralized and easy to browse, eh?
I guess it also helps that i'm well-versed in ports. Though, getting X up and running in FreeBSD is EXACTLY THE SAME (not similar, EXACTLY THE SAME -THEY ARE THE SAME SET OF PROGRAMS!) as it is in Gentoo, after you get X installed. The process there is pretty similar, though.
Re:Journaling Filesystem (Score:1, Informative)
Actually it doesn't need to run. The file system is consistent and you can start using it right away at boot. The only issue an background fsck would clear up is that there may be some freed space (via rm(1) or rmdir(1)) that is still marked as allocated, so it isn't available.
Re:Any reason to switch? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Any reason to switch? (Score:4, Informative)
I had some troubles getting X working properly as well but did in the end. It's a bit stupid the hoops you have to jump through to set up X in 2006 but there ya go. I did a quick writeup here: http://stable.cowoh.org/2006/05/05/linux-users-ad
Re:BSD and clusters (Score:3, Informative)
Brooks Davis, Michael AuYeung, Gary Green, Craig Lee
The Aerospace Corporation
El Segundo, CA
{brooks,lee,mauyeung} at aero.org, Gary.B.Green at notes.aero.org
© 2003 The Aerospace Corporation
Presented at BSDCon 2003, September 8-12 2003.
http://people.freebsd.org/~brooks/papers/bsdcon20
Grid Computing with FreeBSD
Brooks Davis
The Aerospace Corporation
El Segundo, CA
{brooks,lee} at aero.org
© 2004 The Aerospace Corporation
Presented at the UseBSD SIG of the 2004 USENIX Annual Technical Conference, June 27 - July 2, 2004, Boston, MA.
http://people.freebsd.org/~brooks/papers/usebsd20