Utah Votes 'No' to Darwin's Critics 792
NewbieV writes "An article in Tuesday's New York Times notes that proposed legislation which would have 'stress[ed] that not all scientists agree on which theory regarding the origins of life, or the origins or present state of the human race, is correct;' has failed by a 46-28 vote in a Republican-controlled state House of Representatives."
Good Riddance To Yet More Bad Rubbish (Score:3, Informative)
Much more information regarding this decision can be found in this Salt Lake Tribune article [sltrib.com], including many memorable quotes from the legislators involved.
From TFA: Also from TFA (this one is priceless): Kudos to the Utah House of Representatives for giving this bill (as well as Senator Buttars himself) the treatment they both so richly deserve.
Re:saints preserve us (Score:2, Informative)
It is a good system. Let the schools teach science, let church teach faith, and let each individual figure it out for themselves.
Re:Good Riddance To Yet More Bad Rubbish (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Butt-ars? (Score:4, Informative)
For more Chris Buttars, please read [livejournal.com] through his various appearances as a nominee for "Boner of the Day" (morning show, daily moron contest).
Some of his great quotes include:
Re:Good Riddance To Yet More Bad Rubbish (Score:3, Informative)
The theory doesn't say man evolved from the ape but that man and ape once had a _common ancestor_. But I guess we can't expect everybody to be well-informed, even those who hold the power to decide...
*sigh*
Re:Enough Tolerance (Score:3, Informative)
None, as far as I know. Often our morality and thus school rules and such are informed by religious principles, but never science.
As someone else pointed out, BYU, the only private Mormon university, teaches evolution in biology class. The public schools do the same.
Re:I'm not really surprised (Score:3, Informative)
Note that this does not grant anyone the right to not worship. It is freedom to religion, not freedom from religion.
Let's quote a non-authority who makes a wild guess (Score:1, Informative)
This is a completely bogus number. (Hint: it starts with the word "probably.")
I'm going to make up my own number. 90 percent of LDS people don't know what their church's stand on evolution is.
Here's another number: 90 percent of college educated people don't know what Darwin wrote about the origin of human life. They know the general sketches of natural selection and other principles of evolution, but don't know Darwin's specific ponderings of these principles as applied to the origin of human life.
Boy, making up numbers is fun.
Fact: The doctrine of the LDS church is that Man was created by God, and all humans are children of God.
Fact: This does not preclude the principles of evolution in nature. Humans can walk into a science lab and create and manipulate life forms. Those life forms can evolve after they are created.
Fact: Humans have changed over time and locations--height, weight, hair color, skin color, lifespan, etc.
I'm not familiar with any scientific evidence that every single living thing on Earth evolved from the same original organism. If you believe that life emerged from some primordial ooze, there is not reason not to believe that it didn't emerge twice, or 10 times, or 1000 times, or 1 million times. In fact, you kind of have to believe that it did. Statistically, one solitary original life form would never survive long enough to reproduce. But 1 million spontaneous life forms emerging over 1000 years might result in 100 survivors, or 10. Why not believe that a human evolved from a different original source than did an oak tree?
Re:Good Riddance To Yet More Bad Rubbish (Score:3, Informative)
However, "evolution" with respect to the origin of life is a theory.
Evolution does not concern itself with the origin of life. Evolution is the fact that organisms reproduce, mutate, and change. Evolution by natural selection is an important biological theory that is widely midunderstood. Abiogenesis [wikipedia.org] is the theory that life on earth came from primordial ooze, and it has a lot less evidence for it than does evolution. This does not mean that is it neccessarily incorrect.
Of course, many theists just lump them all together because they are either confused or deceptive.
Re:Let's quote a non-authority who makes a wild gu (Score:3, Informative)
I'd go even further and say that 90% of Mormons think they know the position of the church on evolution and they are wrong. Wrong in that they don't know what the position is, and wrong in that they assume that it is anti-evolution. The official position is that the church takes no position on the matter. Evolution is not incompatible with LDS beliefs.