Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Larry Wall on Perl 6 265

Nate writes "Linux Format magazine has an interview with Larry Wall, the eccentric linguist and coder behind Perl. Larry discusses some of the new Perl 6 features ready to rock the world, and if you're not planning to move from Perl 5.8, he has a few musings on that too."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Larry Wall on Perl 6

Comments Filter:
  • Arg!! (Score:1, Funny)

    by TooCynical ( 323240 ) on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @09:45AM (#14298030)
    "For the full interview, in which Larry discusses more about O'Reilly and the upcoming Perl 6, grab a copy of LXF 75."

    Annoying.

    R
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @09:48AM (#14298048)
    Gentlemen, the time has come for a serious discussion on whether or
    not to continue using Perl for serious programming projects. As I will
    explain, I feel that Perl needs to be retired, much the same way that
    Fortran, Cobol and C have been. Furthermore, allow me to be so bold
    as to suggest a superior replacement to this outdated language.

    To give you a little background on this subject, I was recently asked
    to develop a client/server project on a Unix platform for a Fortune
    500 company. While I've never coded in Perl before I have coded in VB for
    fifteen years, and in Java for over ten, I was stunned to see how
    poorly Perl fared compared to these two, more low-level languages.

    Perl's biggest difficulty, as we all know, is the fact that it is by far
    one of the slowest languages in existance, especially when compared to
    more modern languages such as Java and C#. Although the reasons for
    this are varied, the main reasons seems to be the way Perl requires a
    programmer to laboriously work with chunks of memory.

    Requiring a programmer to manipulate blocks of memory is a tedious way
    to program. This was satisfactory back in the early days of coding,
    but then again, so were punchcards. By using what are called
    "pointers" a Perl programmer is basically requiring the computer to do
    three sets of work rather than one. The first time requires the
    computer to duplicate whatever is stored in the memory space "pointed
    to" by the pointer. The second time requires it to perform the needed
    operation on this space. Finally the computer must delete the
    duplicate set and set the values of the original accordingly.

    Clearly this is a horrendous use of resources and the chief reason why
    Perl is so slow. When one looks at a more modern (and a more serious)
    programming language like Java, C# or - even better - Visual Basic
    that lacks such archaic coding styles, one will also note a serious
    speed increase over Perl.

    So what does this mean for the programming community? I think clearly
    that Perl needs to be abandonded. There are two candidates that would be
    a suitable replacement for it. Those are Java and Visual Basic.

    Having programmed in both for many years, I believe that VB has the
    edge. Not only is it slightly faster than Java its also much easier to
    code in. I found Perl to be confusing, frightening and intimidating with
    its non-GUI-based coding style. Furthermore, I like to see the source
    code of the projects I work with. Java's source seems to be under the
    monopolistic thumb of Sun much the way that GCC is obscured from us by
    the marketing people at the FSF. Microsoft's "shared source" under
    which Visual Basic is released definately seems to be the most fair
    and reasonable of all the licenses in existance, with none of the
    harsh restrictions of the BSD license. It also lacks the GPLs
    requirement that anything coded with its tools becomes property of the
    FSF.

    I hope to see a switch from Perl to VB very soon. I've already spoken
    with various luminaries in the Perl coding world and most are eager to
    begin to transition. Having just gotten off the phone with Mr. Alan
    Cox, I can say that he is quite thrilled with the speed increases that
    will occur when the Linux kernel is completely rewritten in Visual
    Basic. Richard Stallman plans to support this, and hopes that the
    great Swede himself, Linux Torvaldis, won't object to renaming Linux
    to VB/Linux. Although not a Perl coder himself, I'm told that Slashdot's
    very own Admiral Taco will support this on his web site. Finally,
    Dennis Ritchie is excited about the switch!

    Thank you for your time. Happy coding.
  • Wow (Score:1, Funny)

    by gowen ( 141411 ) <gwowen@gmail.com> on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @09:54AM (#14298087) Homepage Journal
    the plunge in book sales, which was already starting before 9/11 but very much accelerated at that point.
    And the George W. Bush award for using 9/11 as an explanation for something completely unrelated to 9/11 goes to .... Larry Wall.

    George W. Bush was second, though.
  • by gowen ( 141411 ) <gwowen@gmail.com> on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @09:59AM (#14298113) Homepage Journal
    you have to buy the magazine to get the full text...
    And yet you felt the need to copy and paste the bit they gave you, and title it "Full Article Text".

    You sir, are a cretin.
  • by digitaldc ( 879047 ) * on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @10:04AM (#14298134)
    O'Reilly had run into really tough times because of the plunge in book sales, which was already starting before 9/11 but very much accelerated at that point.

    I remember on 9/11 thinking: That's it, I will never buy any more books! The terrorists have won.
  • by mike77 ( 519751 ) <mraley77NO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @10:10AM (#14298167)
    He has won the International Obfuscated C Code Contest [ioccc.org] twice

    So much has now become clear about Perl!

    Don't get me wrong though, Perl is my code of choice.

  • by Dystopian Rebel ( 714995 ) on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @10:15AM (#14298188) Journal
    This lets different kinds of grammatical mutability sneak into the language, and lets people experiment with different syntaxes and different ways of attaching those syntaxes to new kinds of semantics.


    Translation: "Perl 6 code will be the most unreadable Perl ever."

  • Cover Quote (Score:5, Funny)

    by holdp ( 24965 ) on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @10:23AM (#14298224)
    The dead tree version had on the cover a very Larryish
    quote - (roughly) We have 80% of Perl6 done and we are now working on the next 80%.
  • by H0p313ss ( 811249 ) on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @10:33AM (#14298306)

    Larry is a God but Perl makes my head hurt just thinking about it...

    Obfuscation by design?

  • by H0p313ss ( 811249 ) on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @10:37AM (#14298332)

    Now that would make a great O'Reilly title:

    Application Development in Perl: Obfuscation by Design

    Forgive me Larry... I must be grumpy today.

  • by H0p313ss ( 811249 ) on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @10:57AM (#14298446)
    This must be an obscure usage of the word survive of which I was previously unaware.
  • by Billosaur ( 927319 ) * <<wgrother> <at> <optonline.net>> on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @11:00AM (#14298474) Journal

    Larry Wall has announced plans to hardwire Perl 6 into his brain to make it easier for him to do updates in the shower.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @11:18AM (#14298597)
    No, that would be Intelligent Obfuscation.
  • by LarsWestergren ( 9033 ) on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @11:25AM (#14298658) Homepage Journal
    Ouch, such cutting edge satire. Thank you for reminding us that brevity is the soul of wit.
  • by LarsWestergren ( 9033 ) on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @11:36AM (#14298746) Homepage Journal
    But beneath that superficial ugliness lies a sparkling beautiful language.

    So you are telling me that once I kiss the frog it will turn into a beautiful prince? Forget it! I think you are just trying to trick me... ;-)
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @11:40AM (#14298778)
    Translation: "Perl 6 code will be the most unreadable Perl ever."

    Is this one of those different sized infinity problems?

  • by gnuLNX ( 410742 ) on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @02:45PM (#14300731) Journal
    Are you having a Homer Simpson DUH!!! moment yet?

And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones

Working...