Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Sun Microsystems

Economist article on Sun's Linux Strategy 133

DavidNWelton writes "The Economist has a well-written article about Sun's Jonathan Schwartz and his Linux strategy. It also mentions Microsoft, and the SCO lawsuit."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Economist article on Sun's Linux Strategy

Comments Filter:
  • Your second point (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 25, 2003 @10:36AM (#6034819)
    Solaris is in no danger whatsoever from the SCO lawsuit. Solaris is based on System V R4 and is licensed as such. Much has changed in Solaris since those days, but those changes belong to Sun.
  • by max cohen ( 163682 ) on Sunday May 25, 2003 @11:12AM (#6034940)
    Dell offered the best hardware and support for the price and also they do price matching so he got quite a few things cheaper than expected.

    Maybe the best price/performance hardware support, but their Linux software support leaves a lot to be desired (even at the Gold contract level). We bought several Dell PE2650 servers running Linux and I'm finding that the Dell support techs just don't have enough real world experience with Linux to make Dell into a big Unix player (yet). I'm told Dell is working on correcting that as I type this, but until they do Dell won't be as much of an option for those of us who run Unix shops and know what quality support comes from Sun. Anyone can read a manual--including me--when I call Dell (or Sun or HP), I want to talk to someone who knows more than that.

    Surely Sun can't exactly sell the hardware for any cheaper than it can already be bought for, so what's the advantage of choosing them over a company like Dell?

    Why not? Think Dell does anything Sun can't do in designing an x86 system? I don't. Sun engineers design the server, then Sun contracts with some of the same manufacturers other x86 vendors use to have them built. It's not as difficult as it may seem. One of the great assests of building x86 systems is the off the shelf nature of the components. That reduces the learning curve considerably when compared to designing everything yourself for a system that isn't as widely used, i.e. sparc.

    I welcome Sun's effort to ship better Linux servers. When you consider how much Sun knows about Unix, it's great to have that expertise spilling into the Linux world.
  • AMD Opteron (Score:5, Informative)

    by Winnipenguin ( 603571 ) on Sunday May 25, 2003 @11:40AM (#6035087)
    FYI:

    Sun likely to use AMD's Opteron chip
    By Michael Kanellos
    Staff Writer, CNET News.com
    April 8, 2003, 3:47 PM PT
    http://news.com.com/2100-1010-996060.html

    Sun Microsystems will likely adopt the Opteron processor from Advanced Micro Devices as it extends into new branches of the server market.

    Menlo Park, Calif.-based Sun has been testing the forthcoming Opteron chip for servers in its labs, and has found interest for the chip among customers, said John Loiacono, vice president of Sun's operating platforms group. Although he couldn't commit to any definite product plans, Loiacono said that the chip, which comes out April 22, would probably end up in a Sun product.

    "Can we commit to using Opteron today? No," Loiacono said. "Can we use it? Are we likely to use it? Yes."

    The probable endorsement from Sun is one of the strongest yet for the upcoming chip. Although RackSaver and a host of second-tier manufacturers have come out with product plans, no large manufacturer has done so yet. AMD declined to comment.

    Sun's guarded optimism for the chip is a good sign for AMD, said Dean McCarron, principal analyst for Mercury Research. Opteron is designed for servers running up to eight processors, and that market is still largely controlled by the small circle of multinational computer makers. These manufacturers, moreover, tend to be fairly conservative when it comes to new technology.

    "If you can get a Sun or IBM interested, that is crucial," he said. Virtually all of the major manufacturers are testing Opteron, according to Jack Steeg, senior vice president of sales and marketing at Newisys, which is licensing designs for Opteron servers.

    According to Sun executives speaking at the company's quarterly product update, Sun-branded servers containing so-called x86 chips from AMD or Intel will also occupy a more prominent place in the company's overall product line, which is currently dominated by servers running Sun's own UltraSparc chip.

    "You will hear a lot about Solaris x86. There are over 1,000 applications on Solaris x86," said Sun CEO Scott McNealy, referring to the version of Sun's operating system that's tweaked to run on servers containing Intel and AMD chips.

    Sun, in fact, will update its LX50 server, which is designed for x86 chips, in the very near future, company executives have said. Although Opteron comes out in two weeks, Loiacono cautioned against drawing too strong a connection between the Opteron release and the pending update to the LX50. The chip requires a completely new motherboard. Sun is also working on other AMD chips.

    Change of heart
    The fairly buoyant endorsement of technology from the PC world represents something of a change at Sun. The company has engaged in a heated battle for years with Intel, deriding the performance of servers based on Pentium chips and mocking, whenever possible, the sales of the Itanium processor.

    A year ago, Sun deferred "productization" of a version of Solaris for Intel servers. Intel, for its part, has repeatedly noted how servers containing RISC-based chips, like Sun's UltraSparc, have become a smaller part of the overall server market.

    The shift appears to derive from equal doses of opportunity and desperation.

    On the opportunity side, Sun is positioning itself as a complete technology provider that will earn profits from sales of hardware, software and services.

    Intel- or AMD-based servers from Sun will be outfitted with Solaris and a variety of server applications, McNealy said. Even if these typically less-expensive servers don't carry the same margins as Sun's UltraSparc boxes, they will serve as vehicles to sell Sun software.

    The company is kicking off a Chinese menu-style licensing program called Orion to beef up software sales.

    "They (Sun) are making a bigger commitment to supporting other platforms, and what is the best way to do that? By having Linux or x86 in-house," said Kevin Krewell, senior editor at the Micropr
  • by jtharpla ( 531787 ) <jtharp&smalldark,net> on Sunday May 25, 2003 @12:13PM (#6035238) Homepage
    Since Solaris 8, Sun has shipped Netscape as the default browser, not HotJava

    All your fun happy binaries are available at http://www.sunfreeware.com [sunfreeware.com]

    And Sun now ships a Software Companion CD with most common GNU tools and GUI installer.

    Finally, Solaris 9 now includes /usr/sfw, which also has many of the GNU tools.

    For all that, it still takes me about 30 min-1 hour of work to get a Solaris system to the same nice command-line environment as Linux (ksh or bash, color ls, gtar, and vim 6)
  • Re:Two points.... (Score:3, Informative)

    by elmegil ( 12001 ) on Sunday May 25, 2003 @12:47PM (#6035414) Homepage Journal
    Given that Sun explicitly purchased rights to the Unix code base a very long time ago, Solaris is pretty much immune to SCO's claims. Since we have stoped shipping our own Linux as well, we're probably immune on that leg as well. I can't think of anyone in Sun who wants the SCO lawsuit to succeed, but we are pretty safe from them ourselves in any case.
  • Re:New Strategy (Score:4, Informative)

    by elmegil ( 12001 ) on Sunday May 25, 2003 @12:57PM (#6035480) Homepage Journal
    With an OSS approach like BSD or Linux, then multiple companies compete to offer support.

    Where, precisely, is the company that offers 24x7 support for Linux AND your hardware, with onsite options for both, globally, at a lot less than Sun's support price?

    It's nice to talk theoretically about the things that might be, but most customers care about what is.

  • Re:New Strategy (Score:3, Informative)

    by christophersaul ( 127003 ) on Sunday May 25, 2003 @12:58PM (#6035485)
    Linux/Sparc might be an option for small web serving, email and other stuff using OS components, but otherwise what app are you running? Your campus clustered SAP installaton with DR site across the other side of the world supporting your entire business is unlikely to be running Linux/Sparc.

    Have you actually checked the prices for Sun's Linux boxes?

The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford

Working...