Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Slashback

Slashback: Galileo, Backlight, Tariffs 167

Slashback tonight brings you several updates and amplifications on everything from Java in phones and a GPS system in Europe, to the future of Internet audio streaming and (related) near-unbelievable proposed tariffs on nearly anything that will hold data (in Canada). Read on below for the details.

The man is not often wrong. Doc Searls writes: "I wrote a piece piece at the Linux Journal site that you might want to check out. The very first comment is 'This needs to be Slashdotted.' I agree. And not because I'm looking for attention. I want to *call* attention to the CARP Report, which will kill Webcasting with fees. It's a big deal, and I don't see anybody else talking about it. Yet. And we need to."

Would you say that these are more 'puppies," "babies," or "mommas"? Vladimir Vuksan writes: "There are already hundreds of so called Java midlets that will presumably execute on these Nokia puppies or any other Java enabled browser. Check out http://midlet.org/jsp/index.jsp"

Too bad I can't get the entire Economist free just by reading the ads. FortKnox writes: "ZDNet is running a story about generic "Ad-Free Subscription Services" being used on the internet today. The review of these services is from the 'Ad Space Buyer' and how marketing execs are not keen on the idea. Something interesting to read, seeing Slashdot is testing the services."

How about a countersuit for strong-arm tactics? iosphere writes "According to an article on Wired, the judge in BT's case issued a ruling that questions whether or not the technology that was patented is really analogous to todays definition of a hyperlink. She questions how the patent, which was written with only a single computer terminal in mind, can apply to the internet as we know it now."

Update: 03/15 00:31 GMT by T : arget writes with a few more data points: "An article at News.com suggests that Prodigy has won a TKO in the first round. Another story at ZDNet is more neutral, but quotes an expert saying that prior art will 'come back to haunt BT's efforts.' Both articles agree that motions for summary judgement and probably a ruling will come soon."

Portable Monopoly kylus writes "Roughly a month after it was last mentioned here, the Gameboy Advance light project over at Portable Monopoly takes another step closer to fruition. While the official release date is in May, the group will begin accepting preorders on Friday, March 15th for the $35 light kit, which has been officially named 'Afterburner.' In addition to this news, they've provided some video captures of the product in action."

Remember, as reader Vito puts it, that's Portable Monopoly's warranty-voiding, solder-requiring, tech-support-suiciding Gameboy Advance internal lighting kit. :) Your own risk, et cetera.

This goes beyond disputes about how to spell "meter." meehawl writes with an update on the European Union's plans for a GPS workalike system, which we had previously reported had been scrapped.

"So after the Pentagon removed GPS's Selective Availability, the maximum GPS accuracy is typically within 10 to 20 meters. Differential GPS can reduce this to minute levels, very useful for calling in airstrikes and pinpointing installations, and so on.

So it's probably no surprise that the the European Union's plans to build their own GPS system, the Galileo Project, met such stern resistance from the U.S., with Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz asking EU defence ministers not to go ahead, saying it could complicate US satellite-assisted warfare and furthermore could be more easily used by anti-US military forces.

The EU has has now rejected the latest message from the U.S., a State Department exhortation to forgo development. Interestingly, the latest rebuff was framed as an anti-monopoly stance, that competition in satellite navigation would be good for business.

Apparently, Osama is responsible for this latest rebirth of the European space industry.

Perhaps more worryingly, in a related development a UK company was awarded the "Skynet 5" military communications system contract. Don't these people watch movies at all?"

The principle of the thing. Boone^ writes "It's been well covered, but The Tech Report has written a nice little article going through the finer points of the proposed levy and why there should be more people than just Canadians lobbying against it."

Perhaps some more apprentices will emerge from the woodwork? pynchin writes "Kyle Sallee, creator of Sorcerer GNU Linux has just announced on #sorcerer that he will no longer be involved with SGL. Some disgruntled SGL users forked the distro a few days ago -- see www.lunar-penguin.com for details."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Slashback: Galileo, Backlight, Tariffs

Comments Filter:
  • more Nokia pics... (Score:3, Informative)

    by bob@dB.org ( 89920 ) <bob@db.org> on Thursday March 14, 2002 @08:12PM (#3165656) Homepage
    at this page [infosync.no]

    it's just GSM 900/1800, so i guess you americans will just have to wait...

  • Re:Disgruntled? (Score:2, Informative)

    by jeffphil ( 461483 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @08:32PM (#3165759)
    I think the disgruntled people are at the Sorcerer site http://sorcerer.wox.org/ [wox.org] where the home page gives the blow-by-blow account.

  • by WasterDave ( 20047 ) <davep&zedkep,com> on Thursday March 14, 2002 @08:37PM (#3165782)
    I'm frying my hat in butter and a little garlic as we speak. Soon, in little strips and maybe tossed into a salid it shall be headed down my gullet because something I never thought would happen obviously has.

    Europe, as a whole, as an administrative behemoth designed primarily to redistribute wealth towards French farmers, has got it. It has understood the whole concept of control of information systems to an almost Microsoft level of conception ... and it doesn't like what it sees.

    GPS gives us stuff we *need* right now. It navigates our aircraft, ships, even satellite launches themselves and control of the GPS system equates to control of these increasingly critical resources. If George Dubbya, or indeed any future US president decides that the war against terrorism suddenly includes Europe he'll be able to shut the place down with the single click of a (probably Microsoft) mouse. Let's face it, it's not that unlikely. With the whole Afghanistan thing the US has proven it is quite willing to act unilaterally in kicking anyone's arse it damn well feels like.

    Europe's take on the situation? Fuck that, we'll build our own. And using $2.2bn that was otherwise vital for Monsieur Marcaud to sit on his butt and watch Canal+ we suddenly have Europe taking control over it's own future. "if the EU went ahead with its own satellite positioning system its radio signals might interfere with US military operations based on GPS. " - I imagine it says that somewhere on the requirements document too.

    Strike one for disarming the warmongering lunatics, thank god for that.

    Dave
  • Nitpick (Score:4, Informative)

    by Nerds ( 126684 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @08:40PM (#3165803) Homepage
    The Afterburner is a front light, not a back light.

  • Media levy petition (Score:2, Informative)

    by mistered ( 28404 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @08:55PM (#3165864)
    There's a virtual petition against the proposed media levy increases at Sycorp [sycorp.com]. They collected more than 25000 "signatures" when the levy was first proposed; there's 572 on the list as I write this.

    Fellow Canadians, head over and have a look, and sign it if you want to communicate your "strong disapproval with the levy on blank recording media."

  • by FFFish ( 7567 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @10:03PM (#3166162) Homepage
    THE VIRTUAL PETITION IS USELESS.

    The Copyright Board will pay attention only to email sent to majeau.claude@cb-cda.gc.ca, or postal mail sent to the Secretary General.

    The electronic petition is a waste of your time. If you want to stop this proposal before it gets off the ground, you need to ACT FAST (you have one month) and SEND YOUR MESSAGE DIRECTLY.

    Please take the time to read the proposal [cb-cda.gc.ca] itself. And do hit up The Tech Report [tech-report.com], which has provided a nice overview of the situation.

    ACT NOW! If you don't participate, you will be screwed.
  • by Hackysack ( 21649 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @11:18PM (#3166441)
    I'd comment on their site, but I don't trust them with my email address...

    Here's what I wrote before their system figured out that sadasdasdasd@asdasdasda.asdasd was a bad address ;)

    ---Begin---
    Advertizers can bite me, and I say that as the owner of a web site which used to depend on advertizing revenue. (actually, oddly enough it was the company that now is Zdet that was providing our ads)

    This was a year and a half ago during the final days of "we guarantee a sell out, $2.00 /CPM.

    anyhow, we went from pulling revenue of $70,000 a month to nothing inside of 30 days when ZDnet pulled the ad contract from us (new economy, nothing nefarious like content problems).

    8 Months ago we moved to a premium subscription model, now we have over 25,000 subscribers. Revenue is much more stable than it ever was during the Advertizing phase.

    We still run advertizing on the site, but it's there to mostly convince people to pay to get rid of it, since we make about 100x more off a viewer who pays than a viewer who sees the ads.

    Yes, we're an awful demographic. But in the end, the fact that we serve some 60 Million Ads a month should account for more than $3,000 revenue (which is all we get for ads these days)

    So, the advertizers can do whatever the heck they like, but untill they're willing to pay more than the individual is willing to pay me to not see the ads, the can lick at the heels of people who don't buy things online as far as I'm concerned.

    It's not short sighted. It's called comminity building. Many people will pay $2.00 a month to get rid of the ads on their favorite site. How many advertizers are willing to pay $2.00 for every viewer that comes to your site in a month?

    The advertizers can reap the seeds they sewed.

    ~a
    ---End---
  • by phraktyl ( 92649 ) <wyattNO@SPAMdraggoo.com> on Friday March 15, 2002 @01:16AM (#3166758) Homepage Journal

    While the folks at Lunar did indeed fork, and take half of the SGL users along with them, Sorcerer Linux [sorcerylinux.org] still lives on even without Kyle's leadership. Indeed, in the past week, it has undergone massive changes in management when Kyle tried to remove the distro all together, and many of us stepped up to the plate to keep the project going.

    While we are still growing into the project, we have accomplished a great deal in a week, and are planning great things for Sorcerer. It is a great distro, and we are fighting to keep it as such.

    Wyatt Draggoo
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 15, 2002 @08:33AM (#3167431)
    No one on slashdot seems to understand the issues here. This is just like the astronomers who oppose Iridium: there is only a certain amount of bandwidth available, especially when you are transmitted through the ionosphere as well as air. GLONASS is already a done deal, so no one is complaining about the loss of bandwidth.
    But since Galileo is still in the planning stage some people, whether they are in US military, communications industry, or astronomers, would like to discourage its implementation so there is less pressure on what bandwidth people are using. You get the same kind of complaints whenever people are putting up a major satellite constellation. For something as important as a GPS system serving hundreds of millions, I think it these complaints should not be an overriding factor.

    There is an additional fact that Slashdotters don't understand, and the Guardian article is confused over. Like the US GPS system, this is not being planned for the benefit of private use. The Navstar system is fine for that, and will only improve with time. This has nothing to do with the possibility of the US turning Selective Availability back on.
    It is simply that everyone has seen the importance of smart bombs in military action. If Europeans want smart bombs with military accuracy, they will either have to ask the US to drop the bombs for them (as with Yugoslavia), or have their own GPS. This is all about Europe maintaining military credibility in the 21st century. For once, it is not the fault of US unilateralism. It is simply the case that if you are going to bomb someone, smart bombs are more effective and usually save civilian lives as well.

Never call a man a fool. Borrow from him.

Working...