If I could print 1 replacement organ ...
Displaying poll results.25105 total votes.
Most Votes
- Will ByteDance be forced to divest TikTok Posted on March 20th, 2024 | 9306 votes
- What's the highest dollar price will Bitcoin reach in 2024? Posted on February 28th, 2024 | 8490 votes
Most Comments
- What's the highest dollar price will Bitcoin reach in 2024? Posted on February 28th, 2024 | 68 comments
- Will ByteDance be forced to divest TikTok Posted on February 28th, 2024 | 20 comments
knees (Score:4, Informative)
If I had a million dollars I could get those fixed now. So maybe I'd just print $1 million rather than wait.
Re:Pancreas (Score:4, Informative)
If it was possible several years ago I would check OE pancreas as well but for my Dad who passed away from pancreatic cancer. Only had 7 weeks from diagnosis until death.
Re:Pancreas (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Pulmenary system (Score:5, Informative)
That said, to the OP: Quit! Quit now! You will never regret quitting! Nothing feels better than waking up in the morning not needing a smoke.
Don't forget all the extra money you will have for new "toys".
Re:Foreskin (Score:2, Informative)
Either way it is no big deal.
I wish. The foreskin is an important part of male anatomy, and circumcision has serious negative consequences for not only the man, but his female partner as well.
A study in 2007 by Sorrells, et al., measured the fine-touch sensitivity of 19 different places on the male genitalia, both circumcised and intact. This study concluded that "circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of [male anatomy]."
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/pdf/sorrells_2007.pdf
Someone was nice enough to create color-coded diagrams using the data from this study to visually show the areas of sensitivity:
http://www.circumstitions.com/Sexuality.html#sorrells
Google functions of the foreskin for more information.
Re:Pancreas (Score:4, Informative)
The problem isn't that [single payer healthcare is] evil, it's that the U.S. simply can't afford it.
I see this claim often, but it's simply not true. The UK spends about $3000 per person per year. The US spends nearly three times that much, and doesn't even get coverage for everyone as a result.
The cost delta, scaled to our ~300M population, is over $1.5 Trillion per year. If we wanted less-meager universal healthcare, we could spend 66% more than the UK, in which case we'd save "only" $1T per year.