Journal slashdot_commentator's Journal: Criticize Microsoft security, get fired. 2
After 12 rejections and the "de rigeur" absence of explanations, I've decided to post each story I submit to
...and given the nature of this story, it should be interesting to see if
The soon to be rejected submission:
Dan Geer Jr., is now the former CTO of @Stake, Inc. (a security consulting group), after participating with six other security experts in a report (released yesterday) critical of the US Government's over-reliance in Microsoft products. The report, entitled "CyberInsecurity: The Cost of Monopoly" argues that a "monoculture" of OS software makes gov't computers more vulnerable to computer viruses and hacker attacks.
``The values and opinions of the report are not in line with AtStake's views,'' the company said in a statement. It said Geer's participation working on the report was ``not sanctioned.''
Bruce Schneier, the chief technology officer for Counterpane Systems Inc., worked with Geer on the report. He said security experts contacted to help work on the report critical of Microsoft indicated their support but couldn't participate publicly. ``There is a huge chilling effect based on Microsoft's monopoly position,'' Schneier said. ``It's unfortunate that AtStake put its private agenda ahead of intellectual integrity.''
More sordid details can be gleaned here and here.
Lets hope Schneier still has a job by the end of the week. (And any
...and yes, there are more sordid details... (Score:2)
Also, another underlying story is how this report is being suppressed by professional magazines. (My God, the CCIA is willing to PAY these rags to advertise their findings. And they still get rejected!)
again rejected... (Score:2)
Damn, someone beat me to it.