Journal jeffy124's Journal: MLB All Star Game (Poll) 18
Baseball's All Star game requires each team be represented by at least one player. This was a good idea, when there were 10 teams in each league. But now with 14 AL teams and 16 NL teams, you end up having some deserving players snubbed because some low-ranking team has to have someone at the game. To my knowledge, the NBA, NHL, and NFL have no such requirements for their All Star games.
Question #1: Should MLB eliminate this rule?
Additionally, MLB allows fans to vote for the starting lineups. Result is a popularity contest. IMO, Sammy Sosa does not deserve to be a starter this year, yet is #2 in outfielder voting. IMO, either Andrew Jones or Albert Pujols are much more deserving of a start. Similar has happened in previous seasons, such as 1990's Mike Schmidt getting voted a starter despite retirement in May, or the countless Ken Griffey Jr injuries.
This year MLB is allowing players to vote as well, and their vote will carry some weight.
Question #2: Will it help?
Em answers (Score:1)
For example, the Devil Rays have a crappy team. they do however, have some nice young talen developing in the majors, such as Baldelli, their center fielder. Now, since he is (by most accounts) the best player on the team, he should go, even over the likes of Andrew Jones or another big name center fielder. The reason is because each city deserves a chance to root on one of their home teams' players.
Question 2: Yeah, it is a popularity c
Define 'star' (Score:1)
Secondly, the players voting should be the basis of selection, followed by Managers/GMs and Sportswriters.
Fans should be allowed to watch the game. That's about it.
I mean, Phillies fans were chanting E-A-G-L-E-S at the game on Sunday. You want these people with ballots?!?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Disagreements and reasons (Score:2)
Yes - sportswriters vote for Baseball HOF. I dont know about football or otehr spor
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Disagreements and reasons (Score:2)
IMO, they (MLB) should publish ballots in newspapers at least weekly, as an ad in the sports section. This will at least give those fans without Internet and/or cant afford going to games a chance to vote.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Disagreements and reasons (Score:2)
Free Pete! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Free Pete! (Score:1)
Dude clearly broke the rules and never admitted it.
So what if the rules seem trivial to us, he knew before he did what he did that it was wrong.
I have no pity for pete until he admits that he bet on baseball. Until then, suck on it, Pete.
Re:Free Pete! (Score:1)
Re:Free Pete! (Score:1)
Other examples of grabasstic bags of shit include Darryl Strawberry and that other dude, Doc Gooden.
those two are winners, let me tell you.
Re:Free Pete! (Score:1)
You are right: Pete has to fess up. Problem is, he's still got a gambling problem. Maybe his friends/family need to pull an intervention?
My problem with the whole thing is... (Score:1)
Not apart.... (Score:1)
Re:Free Pete! (Score:2)
Do you mean Oriole Park at Camden Yards or Camden NJ's minor league stadium?
Angelos's tombstone - huh?
Re:Free Pete! (Score:1)
Re:Free Pete! (Score:1)
Yeah, I understand what you mean now by walking over Angelos's tombstone.