Journal Profane MuthaFucka's Journal: Funny, she doesn't LOOK like a bigot... 36
Now, back to the parade of bigotry which composes the Republican party today.
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/08/18/hitler-israel/
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Funny, she doesn't LOOK like a bigot...
There's nothing worse for your business than extra Santa Clauses smoking in the men's room. -- W. Bossert
Re: (Score:1)
Since the poster uses the word "Far Left", which doesn't actually exist, I would say the author of that Web site should not be taken seriously. Gateway Pundit is one of those humour sites like The Onion, though irony and sarcasm seem to be hard for some people to understand.
Re: (Score:1)
The anti-semitism on the left the website was referring to is actually criticism of Israel.
The point that Israel is a country and Jews are people and one can criticize Israel as a country without being anti-semitic is lost on these morons.
Re: (Score:1)
Everybody's a plant. I'm a Ficus myself. Haven't you figured it out yet? None of these events are real. In fact, nothing is real. Everything is all staged in the same studio where they faked the moon landings and the Kennedy assassination, and you're just seeing it all on a really big screen. Actually you're not seeing anything because you don't exist either. You're just "an undigested bit of beef, a blot of mustard, a crumb of cheese, a fragment of an underdone potato..."
Re: (Score:1)
Yours is the most perceptive and intelligent post that I've read in weeks.
Love is a curious thing (Score:1)
Nazi Germany nationalized health care, so I guess its appropriate to praise Adolf Hitler as its founding father.
http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/national-health-care-medicine-in-germany-1918-1945/ [thefreemanonline.org]. There's a good book out there, can't remember its name, that explains how Liberals are Fascists.
Re: (Score:1)
Godwins Law invoked. STFU now, k tnx bai.
Re: (Score:1)
STFU now
The more people try to silence me, the more vigorous my banjo playing becomes. I raise my freak flag high!
Re: (Score:1)
Welcome here, I see you're a fan of a certain crank named Reich, who was deservedly locked up for his fraudulent business.
You'll find a number of others who have read his book. Why not chat with them?
Re: (Score:1)
So far I have not seen your "fascism Troll" being a Troll (granted I don't follow all of the arguments in your journal). I've only seen you flame him and dismiss his arguments in the same vein that you complain about smitty dismissing your arguments. Granted you've done the same with me when facts don't agree with your Weltanschauung.
Re: (Score:2)
The fascism troll is a troll in that he's always interjecting about a crank named Reich. Reich was a freudian who died in prison, not for his boneheaded ideas as his disciples claim, but because he was selling orgone machines which were a fraud.
Reich had a couple good ideas, but his book on fascism is pretty mundane as far as books on that subject go.
The fascism troll just can't seem to shut up about him though. I can understand that, but he should get his own journal. As an absolutist believer in the 1st A
Re: (Score:1)
The fascism troll is a troll in that he's always interjecting about a crank named Reich. Reich was a freudian who died in prison, not for his boneheaded ideas as his disciples claim, but because he was selling orgone machines which were a fraud.
That's the point, the "fascism" Troll wasn't talking about "orgone machines" he was talking about Reich's ideas about Fascism. I don't dismiss [wikipedia.org] your ideas because you are a Liberal or because you masturbate in public.
Re: (Score:1)
Well, there's also the point, which I've made the FT numerous times, that while I agree that fucking and controlling other people's fucking is at the root of a great amount of evil, it's hardly a good way to get at something in detail.
The FT never explains himself. He just scolds me for failing to say that everything is about fucking and controlling other people's fucking.
I'd be just as annoyed with a Physics Troll who invaded every journal to scold me for not mentioning that ultimately, it's the bosons. Wa
Re: (Score:2)
you have yet to explain where he goes wrong,
Too general. I've already explained it. We know it's all about fucking. A bit more detail is required.
You, too, seem to believe that psychology is nothing more than mysticism.
Psychology is philosophy, which has not yet turned into a proper science. It's still in the cocoon. Treating Freud like a god is unwarranted.
At this point you simply appear to be Railgunner's evil siamese twin separated at birth. I expected better. I'm on your back because your replies intere
Re: (Score:1)
Psychology is philosophy, which has not yet turned into a proper science. It's still in the cocoon.
Citation needed. Though I do smell ignorance of psychology, philosophy, and of what science is. I've generally noticed that people who say things like this usually have pre-conceived notions (prejudices), little education of the subject matter they allude to except for what they have experienced in the popular media, and often agendas of there own that they project onto other people. This is just an observation, take it as is.
Since it is obvious that you know what a proper science is, then you should inform
Re: (Score:1)
Citation needed.
Though I do smell ignorance of psychology, philosophy, and of what science is.
No, that's not what you smell. Your brain has used a heuristic which is not applicable in my case.
I've generally noticed that people who say things like this usually have pre-conceived notions (prejudices), little education of the subject matter they allude to except for what they have experienced in the popular media, and often agendas of there own that they project onto other people. This is just an observation,
Re: (Score:1)
As an aside, I have a feeling that Freud's ideas will be found to be bullshit with a tiny kernel of truth.
Quite the opposite is happening. You should know this. You should also know that Freud's ideas were empirical and that the modern scientific method had not been established during his career, and that he was aware of the technical limitations of his field (which have been mitigated today with modern technology).
You "cite" a lot, but smitty uses a lot of words also without saying very much. You have never shown be that psychologists do not use the scientific method, but you have implied that psychology is Fr
Re: (Score:1)
I bring up Freud a lot because I am not a Freudian, and you asked me why the FT bugs me so much. Well, the FT is a Freudian, and that's a big part of our conflict.
Every kind of science develops and evolves, if it didn't then it would not be science, so making that statement is a non sequitur. Claiming that some sciences are "science" and that some sciences are "philosophy" makes no sense whatsoever.
Then you didn't understand anything of what I wrote.
Where's the underlying theory of psychology? There's no co
Re: (Score:1)
Where's the underlying theory of psychology? There's no coherent, experimentation backed, theory which underlies all of psychology. It's still being developed, that's where it is. It's being attacked from several points, but these points haven't linked up.
You could say that of every science, though I'm not sure what you mean by "underlying theory", nor do I know where to look for it in psychology, physics, biology, etc. Nor do I know why anybody would want to look for an "underlying theory". If something doesn't have what you call an "underlying theory" doesn't make something unscientific or even pre-scientific. People don't do science to have or find an "underlying theory" (OK, some people may have the goal of finding, say, a Grand Unified Theory, but that
Re: (Score:2)
In the absence of "controlled fucking" things like irrational hatred(bigotry, racism, etc) will simply cease to exist
THERE. THERE IT IS. That's why you're fucking unwelcome here.
I specifically told you that I was NOT talking about mere bigotry. Not at all. I'm talking about the racist structure of society, which would continue to exist even if bigotry absolutely disappeared.
I am not talking about what you think I am writing about.
*sigh* Again... This time in one sentence, more or less: The subjugation (reme
Re: (Score:2)
No! It won't.
Yes, it will.
Re: (Score:1)
I know.
Re: (Score:2)
Have you ever considered that I don't really give a shit about what you have to say? I don't want to learn what you want to teach? I don't really like Freud very much?
Have you ever considered that I'm a fascist and after a lot of counseling that I'm OK with it? It's one of my character flaws that I'm just going to have to live with. Like my tiny cock.
Re: (Score:1)
Ummmm, Hitler tried to eliminate the national health care that his predecessors already had put into place.
Now, with that book recommendation, you're just fucking with me. You must know how fucking stupid that book is.
Re: (Score:2)
They were the first to have interstate highways as well, yet every state begs at the trough for more highway money with no fear of being labeled a nazi.
Liberals do tend to be for bigger government, which is a worry if you're worried about facism, but the last conservative administration added more to government than the last 3 liberal administrations combined, including some of the most obvious hallmarks of facism: surveillance of citizens without cause, arrests on suspicion with no trials, constant harping
Re: (Score:1)
And the military is not a part of government? And conservatives don't try to grow that as fast as they can?
And the slogans of bigger government/smaller government are meaningless?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, Public Choice economics basically says that all politicians have been corrupted by the ability to spend gov't money to provide services for constituents: it's not about how good a person your congresscritter is, not about the prinicpled stands they take, it's about their ability to bring home the bacon. A logical outgrowth of that corruption is a forever-increasing gov't. Everyone does it.
I don't think a large military in itself is a problem; the funny thing is, democrats tend to have the "better" mil